Last quality game Nintendo made themselves?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Last quality game Nintendo made themselves?

User Info: R_Champ

R_Champ
4 years ago#101
Linetrix posted...
Lemmywinks13 posted...
Hmmm...I think we have to go all the way back to New mario U or Nintendo Land. Or Fluidity Spin Cycle.


>Quality
>Nintendoland

Troll confirmed.


Checked Lintrix profile. He gave 5 stars for FFXIII: Troll confirmed.

User Info: Thunder097

Thunder097
4 years ago#102
The Last of Us , The Last Guardian and Beyond Two Souls enough said/
Official Joel and Ellie of Playstation All Star Battle Royale Board!
Last of Us, Injustice God Among us and Storm 3 :D DmC will be beast!

User Info: ADHDguitar

ADHDguitar
4 years ago#103
R_Champ posted...
Linetrix posted...
Lemmywinks13 posted...
Hmmm...I think we have to go all the way back to New mario U or Nintendo Land. Or Fluidity Spin Cycle.


>Quality
>Nintendoland

Troll confirmed.


Checked Lintrix profile. He gave 5 stars for FFXIII: Troll confirmed.


Bashing Nintendo Land (almost certainly without having played it) is reason enough to confirm for troll. The game is overpriced, but better than half the AAA garbage that comes out nowadays.
Still waiting for Diddy Kong Racing 2

User Info: DemonDog666

DemonDog666
4 years ago#104
ADHDguitar posted...
Bashing Nintendo Land (almost certainly without having played it) is reason enough to confirm for troll. The game is overpriced, but better than half the AAA garbage that comes out nowadays.


It's only better then half the garbage and you think it's quality?

User Info: ADHDguitar

ADHDguitar
4 years ago#105
DemonDog666 posted...
ADHDguitar posted...
Bashing Nintendo Land (almost certainly without having played it) is reason enough to confirm for troll. The game is overpriced, but better than half the AAA garbage that comes out nowadays.


It's only better then half the garbage and you think it's quality?


You may be a mad troll, but that was actually pretty funny.

But to be completely honest, I actually enjoy some AAA garbage. Loving the hell out of Halo 4.
Still waiting for Diddy Kong Racing 2

User Info: KAMMYqueen

KAMMYqueen
4 years ago#106
Why are we feding the troll
KAMMY KOOPA and baby kammy koopa for Super Smash Bros
U

User Info: Soanevalcke6

Soanevalcke6
4 years ago#107
DemonDog666 posted...
Soanevalcke6 posted...
No, exclusivity deals bind a company to Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft for a certain amount of time (Usually Years) Thhose are Second Party. First Party is any Studios that they own, not just have deals with.


timed exclusives aren't even second party games, they are third party games made by third party devs. And second party studio is one they own the majority of shares but is externally run.


No. Nintendo owned 49% of Rare's shares and had an exclusivity deal with them for years. They were second party not third party. Same with Silicon Knights. Retro Studios and Monolith Soft are examples of First Party, and Capcom and Konami are examples of Third Party. I hope this helps clear up your confusion :)
They made a moon base to survey my standards but they have yet to make visual contact.
PSN/NNID/Steam: Soanevalcke6 // http://www.backloggery.com/soanevalcke6

User Info: Robot_Soopa

Robot_Soopa
4 years ago#108
unnamedFer posted...
3D Zelda games are kinda going down slightly in terms of difficulty, exploration and dungeon design after Ocarina of time. Not bad games in the slightiest, but not perfect 10s either.


But Majora's Mask was hard. Wind Waker was easy. TP was harder.

User Info: DemonDog666

DemonDog666
4 years ago#109
Soanevalcke6 posted...
DemonDog666 posted...
Soanevalcke6 posted...
No, exclusivity deals bind a company to Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft for a certain amount of time (Usually Years) Thhose are Second Party. First Party is any Studios that they own, not just have deals with.


timed exclusives aren't even second party games, they are third party games made by third party devs. And second party studio is one they own the majority of shares but is externally run.


No. Nintendo owned 49% of Rare's shares and had an exclusivity deal with them for years. They were second party not third party. Same with Silicon Knights. Retro Studios and Monolith Soft are examples of First Party, and Capcom and Konami are examples of Third Party. I hope this helps clear up your confusion :)


Yeah I really don't know lol second party is horribly defined either way, it's easier to tell what isn't then is, maybe owning shares + exclusivity deal= 2nd party but just an exclusive deal doesn't especially timed ones.

User Info: GoombaX

GoombaX
4 years ago#110
NSMBU
Pro tip : Thats not how I would do it
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Last quality game Nintendo made themselves?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived