Remember when people thought the Wii-U might run PS3/360 ports at 1080p/60fps?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Remember when people thought the Wii-U might run PS3/360 ports at 1080p/60fps?

User Info: lemodz

lemodz
3 years ago#1
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-resident-evil-revelations-face-off

Good times.
http://i.imgur.com/ROrVv.gif

User Info: Jackal

Jackal
3 years ago#2
You'll get marked for "Rubbing salt in the wounds." :-)
PSN: Jackal-5, XBox: Jackal 55 (No, I don't have a 360)
EVE Online: Jonak, Ouya: Zeek_Bronz

User Info: The_King82

The_King82
3 years ago#3
"the Wii U version appears to be visibly less refined in this area, with small but frequent fluctuations in smoothness adding some noticeable stutter to the experience."

OUCH!!!!!
8GB OF GDDR5 RAM!!!!!

User Info: srsgamer87

srsgamer87
3 years ago#4
Xbots, go home!

It's almost like developers are having trouble optimizing their games to a newer console then a console that's been out for 6+ years. Weird.

User Info: IcedEarthaholic

IcedEarthaholic
3 years ago#5
Bah, I didn't really notice anything out of the ordinary with the demo on the Wii U at all, if anything it looked and played fantastically here. If it was truly unplayable, I wouldn't buy it.
Want to help bring Fatal Frame Deep Crimson Butterfly to NA?Join Operation Zero https://www.facebook.com/pages/Operation-Zero/131582506953973
Haley Joel Osment 3 years ago#6
srsgamer87 posted...
It's almost like developers are having trouble optimizing their games to a newer console then a console that's been out for 6+ years. Weird.

This is a port of a 3DS game, a system equivalent in power to the GameCube, and it runs at a worse framerate on the Wii U than it does the 3DS. That goes a little beyond optimisation.
I see dead people.

User Info: sonicsonic

sonicsonic
3 years ago#7
It's like Capcom spent less time on the WiiU version, cause it would obviously sell the least. Strange...

...Not really.

User Info: Panner

Panner
3 years ago#8
To me the WiiU version looked the best.
The frame rate looked smoother while some of the textures looked sharper on the WiiU version.
Gamertag : Steel Hunter
NNID : SteelHunter

User Info: IcedEarthaholic

IcedEarthaholic
3 years ago#9
The article was ridiculously biased to boot. Bringing up the 3DS version to trash the Wii U version? Sorry, but that's just wrong. Blatant, yellow journalism there. Best thing to do is dismiss the article.
Want to help bring Fatal Frame Deep Crimson Butterfly to NA?Join Operation Zero https://www.facebook.com/pages/Operation-Zero/131582506953973

User Info: Gamespoht

Gamespoht
3 years ago#10
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-need-for-speed-most-wanted-wii-u-face-off

Yep, those were some gooood times....
''No copyright law in the universe is going to stop me''-Sonic The Hedgehog
I am Gamespot's Unofficial Mascot....Love Me.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Remember when people thought the Wii-U might run PS3/360 ports at 1080p/60fps?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived