Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

User Info: WingZero0782

4 years ago#11
Better, Reach's story was unnecessary (the one in the game), I'm not getting into why I said that as I've brought it up too many times on here.
Currently Playing: who the **** cares.
DCUO Name: Techno Knight, Level: 30, Server: Crossfire, League: TheGothamKnights.

User Info: wg64Z

4 years ago#12
These are as opposed to Reach

Grenade Indicator
No weapons on map
Instant Respawn = No teabagging, a Halo staple for years
Promethian Vision
Menus are terrible
Higher leveled people have better equipment
No Rumble pit
Unlocking Emblems
No Halo theme in game, ever
Hammer got nerfed massively
You can't pickup grenades without wasting a perk slot
Joining a game as a party can and will split you up
Unavoidable, and inaccurate kill cams
No Revenant or Falcon
Maps aren't nearly as good/plentiful

No Armor lock
Hologram is useful
Everyone can sprint
Graphics are purdy
Sound effects are amazing
Spartan Ops

I wish I could think of more Pros...

User Info: Majoras_pants

4 years ago#13
It's much better.Reach was good but Halo 4 is an improvement in every way, besides the crappy ordinances.

User Info: Melfiice

4 years ago#14
I liked Reach better. Im hoping in time, this game will grow more on me.

User Info: NightRain

4 years ago#15
IMO, Reach was kinda better...
Xbox 360/Wii
Canadiens/Red Sox/Patriots

User Info: foodeater4

4 years ago#16
Reach was my current favorite besides the original Halo.

The campaigns both are good.

I like Master Chief/Cortanna a ton and its good to see whats happening to them next after H3.

Reach was great too, I know its not much but I love being able to pick gender and select all my own armor. The campaign was very good.

Mulitplayer I definatly like H4 better then Reach. The games are a bit faster, I love the ordinance drops. Cons: Maps: only 4 maps for your standard slayer game types, thats really poor IMO. There should be at least 6-8 maps outta the box for the most popular game type.

I also like spartan ops a lot, much better then another horde IMO, especially since Gears outclasses every other games horde modes.

User Info: Raddy8

4 years ago#17
Campaign was better in Reach imo. MC is cool and all, but I enjoyed being Noble 6. Enemy designs were a bit better in Reach also I think.
Firefight was replaced by Spartan Ops. Pretty similar actually, just a bit of story to Ops though.
MP I am enjoying more in 4 overall. I miss some modes like Invasion, but MP is really fun imo.
Gamertag: Pickle Swift
3DS friend code: 4339-2579-4895

User Info: Protoman_X38

4 years ago#18
Halo Reach had a far better campaign. The story isn't too bad in H4, but the levels are just not as much fun.

There are a lot of features from Reach that are completely absent in H4.

User Info: oblivionscythe

4 years ago#19
With 2 being my favorite & Reach being my least.. This is far better than Reach. But as always, opinions are opinions.
Sent from my iPhone via PowerFAQs 1.9

User Info: RayzerTag

4 years ago#20
EDIT: double post
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived