You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
I don't know. I just think that the Zelda series has enough prequels as is. Seems like besides the cel shaded games, TP and MM and TAOL, they keep going backwards and backwards. I would rather have seen a continuation beyond Twilight Princess or something. But then again, it's nothing that will deter me from actually buying SS, because it looks awesome regardless. I'm just hoping this next Zelda for Wii U will not be ANOTHER prequel.
LttP, LA, and SS are definite prequels. We still don't really know where MC, FSA, and OoX actually place in timeline. We can only speculate where they belong in the timeline. FSA was also a sequel, as it was a follow-up to MC. You really don't have much evidence in favor of your argument. Overall the series has mostly been going forward. Most of the prequels are older games anyway. You complain as if a lot of prequels have been happening. Most of the recent games have been sequels. Besides, nothing's wrong with a sequel or two here and there.