This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

How do you feel about Melee vs. Brawl physics?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Super Smash Bros. for Wii U
  3. How do you feel about Melee vs. Brawl physics?

User Info: psychoboo13

psychoboo13
3 years ago#1
Honestly, after training for and partaking in Melee tournaments for such a long period of time, I completely burnt myself out on the game, physically and mentally. I was happy that many of its mechanics were left out of Brawl, and the floaty engine is much more relaxing and fun to me now, IMO.
Breathe. Believe. Battle.
LoL IGN: burningbagel

User Info: Someguy_13

Someguy_13
3 years ago#2
The faster paced gameplay of Melee is much more intense and makes for a much more enjoyable experience.

Having actual combos really helps the fun too.
Survivor of the Yahoo Bunker War of 2010

User Info: Arcasaurus

Arcasaurus
3 years ago#3
Melee's by far. The floatiness and lack of hitstun just made the game a bore to me, especially when I first played and there were all those moments where the opponent would get sent flying but not quite far enough to get KO'd. The matches just feel so sluggish that it should be called Stall not Brawl.

Not that I want this game to have Melee's physics though. Just something in-between Melee or Brawl would be better in my mind.

User Info: CPU-Z

CPU-Z
3 years ago#4
Melee's was easily better. Brawl's physics reduced combo ability way too much, and even combo centric characters are still hurt by the physics due to the lack of hitstun. It's way too defensive oriented.

User Info: FireKirby7

FireKirby7
3 years ago#5
i hate how in Brawl, you HAVE to go on the defensive after landing a move like Lucas's or Luigi's utilt, or a meteor smash on a grounded opponent, because the hitstun is just that low. combos are fun, so melee :3

User Info: SmallerRidley

SmallerRidley
3 years ago#6
Everything in Brawl is sloppy and slow compared to Melee, which is really freaking sharp. Problem is, that happens when you have more time to design the game, because you have time to design actions for more situations instead of cancelling or funneling into a few general things.
Surely there's no problem with them putting me in Brawl, right?
It's ****ing satire, damnit. In NGE, Doritos are perishable goods.

User Info: Nintendoboy77

Nintendoboy77
3 years ago#7
Melee.

Brawl's isn't that bad, but melee had it's **** together even though it had like 2-3 years less development time than Brawl.

User Info: Cookie_Aroma

Cookie_Aroma
3 years ago#8
I don't like the high hitstun in Melee. When I went back to play Melee, one of the first things I noticed is how often I don't have any control over my character in a free-for-all match. The hitstun is better for 1vs1, but with three people pummeling you, Brawl's lack of hitstun makes things much more enjoyable for me. And since I prefer free-for-all's to 1vs1, I prefer Brawl physics.

User Info: magiciandude

magiciandude
3 years ago#9
Melee's physics was more exciting imo.

User Info: Yo_Yo_Cheese

Yo_Yo_Cheese
3 years ago#10
Melee
Mains: GG: Chipp | BB: Tager | AH3: Catherine | SG: Valentine \ Cerebella
Subs: GG: Robo-Ky, Sol | BB: Jin, Platinum | AH3: Eko, Lilica
  1. Boards
  2. Super Smash Bros. for Wii U
  3. How do you feel about Melee vs. Brawl physics?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived