You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Agreed. The physics seem ridiculous on the previous installments when you go back. I've LOVED every installment of gta since the first top down gta. That being said, IV has been the best one to date. Sure, it could have been way better, but it wa such a technological leap, just walking down the street and shooting at people or just a lazy drive is more fun than San Andreas for me. I can't go back to the old games. They have a special place in my heart, but IV trumps them all IMO.
That being said, V looks to give everyone what they want. The IV lovers and San Andreas is better types alike.
I like gta4 alot, but IMO... It just lacked stuff to do. Seems to me they spent more time on the graphics than adding fun stuff to do.
Yes, but like I was saying...it was a huge technological leap for gta. If it weren't for IV, we wouldn't have had red dead be what it was, or have V be what it was. We would have just had a slightly upgraded saints row 3,so basically with a bunch of ridiculousness and sub par physics and graphics and a ok story (unlike saints row) Then gta v would just be like IV was, a huge tech leap, but limited by the work put into development, or another rendition of a silly game like Saints row 3 was.