You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Hector_Sass posted... While I agree with this concept for Borderlands, seeing as it looks sick as, Gearbox did make Duke Nukem: Forever.
I know people have already explained that Gearbox was given a near-finished version of DNF to work with, but it still annoys me when people blame Gearbox for the game's failure. Enough to complain at least.
devak108 posted... Kapowski, I know this isn't your first day on gamefaqs, but it's ALWAYS like this. Haters gonna hate, trolls troll on EVERY game, regardless of it's quality. I'm kind of surprise that your surprised by this. New game = Troll time, it's always this way.
I totally trust GBox to make a phenomenal sequel so I could really care less what random gfaqs trolls wanna say about it. Just ignore them.
ya I guess I just don't understand the whole troll mentality. Don't really see the point of intentionally acting like an idiot to piss people off.
specialed1583 posted... From: Hector_Sass | #002 While I agree with this concept for Borderlands, seeing as it looks sick as, Gearbox did make Duke Nukem: Forever. You know what else they made? Borderlands.
How can you quote me and STILL miss the point of my post? I was just playing devils advocate geez.
On the DNF topic, Gearbox has stated they would LOVE to make a new Duke Nukem game from scratch. Plus, DNF was doomed to fail no matter which company worked on it simply because of the 12-13 years of hype that was behind it. No game could EVER live up to that build up.