Gamespot's review

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.

User Info: a_lil_monster

4 years ago#1

Not too bad. I was a bit down on it until I read the reviewer's response to a negative comment in the comment section and then I realized that I agree with the review.
Now Playing: Halo 4, Skyrim, Pokemon Black 2

User Info: StreetPasWantr

4 years ago#2
GameSpot ALWAYS post low scores. Look at Skyward Sword. @_@
I hate my name. Pretend it's something really cool until 2023. Hopefully, I'll have a "compelling" reason by then.

User Info: Scout_Taron

4 years ago#3

This game is definitely worthy of a 9. I mean...if you say it has outstanding gameplay and that it sucks you in...As well as having miniscule flaws...What else are you looking for? Just a function of the genre, IMO.

User Info: jonnovision1

4 years ago#4
review scores are rarely accurate to the actual review.
"Reinforcements? I am the Reinforcements."
PKMN Black FC: 0261 9500 8363

User Info: WestbrickIII

4 years ago#5
People moaned and cried about IGN's review, but this one was terrible. Only two main criticisms were offered:

-Multiplayer. It's silly enough to criticize Fire Emblem at all in this regard, since it's a single-player oriented experience, but to say that it's worse than previous entries? Baffling.
-"Cumbersome interface." Not only is there a clear help function to learn about anything you might have missed, but you can click the weapons / items / skills to learn what they mean. Every other reviewer has called this the most accessible and intuitive game in the series, and rightfully so.

Two baseless complaints, -1.5 from the final score. Ridiculous.
The only thing more consistent than the Pats beating the Texans is my mother's regret she survived childbirth, knowing she spawned a welcher

User Info: burninglink5

4 years ago#6
Christ, are you guys seriously complaining about an 8.5? That's a fantastic score.

User Info: Toadster9001

4 years ago#7
The agenda is getting embarrassing, I'm sorry. Gamespot clearly has a bias against the 3DS, particularly Nintendo-published software, and no amount of rhetoric or damage control will change reality.

Steel Diver
Gamespot Score: 4.5
GameRankings Average: 61.75%
Difference: -16.75%

Pokemon Black 2
Gamespot Score: 6.5
GameRankings Average: 81.40%
Difference: -16.40%

Mario Tennis Open
Gamespot Score: 5.5
GameRankings Average: 69.24%
Difference: -14.24%

Pokemon Rumble Blast
Gamespot Score: 4.5
GameRankings Average: 57.85%
Difference: -12.85%

Super Mario 3D Land
Gamespot Score: 8.0
GameRankings Average: 90.19%
Difference: -10.19%

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time 3D
Gamespot Score: 8.5
GameRankings Average: 94.01%
Difference: -9.01%

New Super Mario bros. 2
Gamespot Score: 7.0
GameRankings Average: 78.59%
Difference: -8.59%

Star Fox 64 3D
Gamespot Score: 7.5
GameRankings: 82.16%
Difference: -7.16%

Pilotwings Resort
Gamespot Score: 6.5
GameRankings: 71.94%
Difference: -6.94%

Gamespot Score: 8.5
GameRankings Average: 91.57%
Difference: -6.57%

Fire Emblem: Awakening
Gamespot Score: 8.5
GameRankings Average: 91.42%
Difference: -6.42%

Tetris Axis
Gamespot Score: 7.0
GameRankings Average: 76.33%
Difference: -6.33%

Mario Kart 7
Gamespot Score: 8.0
GameRankings Average: 85.07%
Difference: -5.07%

Kid Icarus: Uprising
Gamespot Score: 8.0
GameRankings Average: 84.55%
Difference: -4.55%

Nintendogs + Cats: French Bulldog and New Friends
Gamespot Score: 7.5
GameRankings Average: 74.40%
Difference: +0.60%
Brothers Obscura

User Info: White_Queen

4 years ago#8
Gamespot rated Dark Souls a 9.5...

User Info: Fate_Assassin

4 years ago#9
burninglink5 posted...
Christ, are you guys seriously complaining about an 8.5? That's a fantastic score. - restored faith in humanity.
3/13/2013, shipment date

User Info: scigeek101

4 years ago#10
burninglink5 posted...
Christ, are you guys seriously complaining about an 8.5? That's a fantastic score.

In a world where review scores are more like the Warp scale from TNG and beyond, 8.5 is much worse than a 9.6.

(For the uninitiated Star Trek the Next Generation (TNG) and following Star Trek series used a unit called "Warp" to measure speeds faster than light. This unit was scaled differently in TNG than in the original Star Trek.

In TNG warp 1 equals the speed of light (C). Warp 10 equals infinite speed. They created a really weird scale for this, Warp 2=10 C. Warp 3= about 50 C and it scales exponentially pretty normally until warp 9, then they basically through their system out the window and have the speed skyrocket at extreme exponential leaps for each decimal point of extra warp they add past 9

So what was the point of that weird aside? Basically video game scores are like warp, they don't exist on a true 10 point scale. Rather quality grown exponentially toward the higher end of the scale. Really while the average score should be a 5, it is really more like 7. So giving Fire Emblem an 8.5 while perfectly reasonable if operating under a 10 point scale, becomes a far different score when operating under the anything under 7 is crap scale. Its the difference between being "excellent" and "above average".
If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.
Harry Truman.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived