You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Is the 3D better than the PS3 version? (which is sort of crap)
I haven't use the 3d for the PS3 for this game because I don't own one but the 3D on the Wii U is better than the 3D in Revelations on the 360. Revelations looked really weird when playing in 3D and this game looks fine. Hope that helps
Some days don't you wish you could high five the sun
Sorry to burst bubbles, as I had stated I really wanted this to be the definitive version, but even the 3d is a bust. I can't comment on the pc or ps3, but the 360 had excellent 3d, and offered both the cruddy inficolor glasses type, as well as the superior frame packing 3d.
Sadly, the wii u version only offers side to side, top to bottom, and the cruddy inficolor. The difference between the frame packing and side/side and top/bottom is immense, as essentially, with frame packing the game resolution is dropped 50%, while with the side to side and top to bottom, it goes to 25%. The 360 version looks amazing in 3d, but the wii u version looks abysmal in 3d.
I thought the wii u was fully capable of 3d, so this is another one of those decisions I just don't understand. I'm really disgusted at how this port was handled. Seriously, the wii u is supposed to have more horsepower, and it gets the laziest port possible....oh well, at least the 360 version is good, and there is a patch coming this week that should fix all the problems (i saw the fix list and its massive).