You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
The problem I see on a lot of these topics either falls under-
1. Realizing Spyro and Crash are under Activision's control, and other copyright issues.
2. Noting that most of these started off on the Playstation, then spread as time went on, IE Big Daddy in Bioshock.
Just thought to point this out.
Spyro was a huge success and one of the big names on the Sony Playstation, along with Cloud, Lara Croft, and Crash Bandicoot. It's a natural reaction to expect the big names. It's like being served a chinese buffet, but missing the general tso chicken and fried rice.
Sure, but the reality is that the restaurant is out of the chicken and rice, meaning you couldn't have had them anyway.
True. But then why substitute the egg drop soup (Solid Snake) with the sweet and sour soup (Raiden)? Why not serve the more logical choice or BOTH?
Funny enought, I was coming up with food names for these characters earlier today (boredom).
Big Dinner Cold McGravy Makin' Cake
Fat Princess would approve.
PSN: snovvbub This signature will not change until there is an HD remake of Infamous, and Infamous 2 is blown to hell.
3 characters that should not be in (Evil Cole, Big Daddy and Dino), 1 character that should have only been included after another big absentee should have been (Raiden), too many cult classics that, although fine if there are one or two, take up too many places in the roster and a number of major characters that should be on there that aren't.
I understand that SB had an up hill battle for this game, but I'm really only interested in the final result, and its disappointing.
"Hey bridesmaid, love the beard! Give's me something to hang onto!!"- Lord Flasheart