Pachter: "Activision needs to charge for Call of Duty multiplayer"

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Pachter: "Activision needs to charge for Call of Duty multiplayer"

User Info: wskingws

wskingws
4 years ago#81
sandman9900 posted...
This guy is an idiot. Nobody wants to pay for multiplayer on top of a $60 game and the live fee. He must work for Capcom.


Hahah dang you beat me to it. I was gonna say the same thing, he must work for capcom.

User Info: GLAMPIRE

GLAMPIRE
4 years ago#82
I don't mind paying for an MMO, but for a FPS? Not a chance.
XBL Gamertag Andii Vamp
PSN ID andii_vamp

User Info: Aether_Lyric

Aether_Lyric
4 years ago#83
The Wii U comment wasn't hate really, it's probably an accurate prediction.

User Info: FlacidSnake

FlacidSnake
4 years ago#84
MoonlightTroll posted...
Despite how massively popular the franchise is, I think a subscription for MP would piss off just about everybody. I really do think that would be suicide for the series.


Nail on the head

Their sales would plummet if they charged a monthly fee on top of a live subscription.
GT: TrulyFlacid

User Info: BipBapBam

BipBapBam
4 years ago#85
If he thinks CoD would've gotten this big if it started with a monthly subscription fee, he's the stupidest person I've ever seen.

I honestly feel bad for Nintendo though, at this pace they will always be an entire generation behind.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Pachter: "Activision needs to charge for Call of Duty multiplayer"

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived