You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
rcommee posted...Will someone please show the wookie some attention.
Its just way too obvious of a troll bait, especially when he keeps spamming it. Its like saying "Why exactly was it bad that those kids were killed last week?". Subtlety works wonders if you're trolling
bigbug1992 posted...rcommee posted...Will someone please show the wookie some attention.
Asking to explain why its unfair for the majority of a lobby to kick one person, is on par with asking why it's bad that CHILDREN were murdered at a school? And I'm the troll?
Andrew_Ryann posted...bigbug1992 posted...rcommee posted...Will someone please show the wookie some attention.
Majority of lobby != party, which is what you were asking about. You're rephrasing it to make it sound better. The party chose to play together, the rest of the players didn't choose to play with them. On top of their opponents having the advantage of knowing each other and working together, now they have to be subjected to being kicked if they displease the party?
If everyone in the lobby is random, they'll choose whatever the first option is that's given to them to get it off the screen. If it's yes, then you have kicks that have no basis, and if its no, I doubt anyone will ever be kicked by the system.
There's a real response, although we all know that's not what you wanted.
I remember Wolfenstien on Xbox years ago had this ability.
It was abused to high hell. People would kick you for the sake of kicking you. Like others have said, when the kick was initiated people would just click yes for the hell of it.
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading.
I remember when I was playing Forza 4 online, at the end off each race everyone in the lobby was given the opportunity to vote 1 person they would like to see removed from the lobby. If you weren't racing clean or if you were not maintaining the level of performance the lobby wanted as a whole, you were out.
Usually there's more than one camper though so it would make so sense. Also I can see people voting the one giving the whoop ass usually the highest prestige etc.
NWalterstorf- "Splinter Cell will turn into a dead series if it doesn't clean up its act."
So it's unfair because you believe they'd implement a system that didn't need the majority vote and because your psychic powers revealed to you that everyone will always vote a certain way no matter what? Just to clarify.
I still don't see the problem with a party booting people from a lobby.
Somehow that doesn't surprise me judging from our conversation in another topic where you have been less then steller with logic.
Every single game I've played with this, people vote almost exclusively in this manner. Everyone else in the thread is also telling you this. What else do you want, a scientific study across every single game that has a vote kick telling you this too? Majority vote always picks the first option because the majority don't really care, they just want the annoying popup off their screen.
Wookie_Is_Back posted...Andrew_Ryann posted...
So don't make it a pop up. Similar to map voting. You don't HAVE to vote. It's an option?
Again I realize its not a realistic thing because so many are against it. Just for debates sake though. What would you say to that?
KCCO & Mind the gap
Andrew_Ryann posted...Wookie_Is_Back posted...
The majority would never be reached by randoms; only full parties would cause it to pass. If the majority is based on who votes, it will always pass because only those that care will to vote at all. This isn't that hard to figure out.
Add user to Ignore List after reporting