So this game is a confirmed 6/10?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. So this game is a confirmed 6/10?

User Info: iamjosh308

iamjosh308
4 years ago#1
By the community here?
*wipes brown*

User Info: shemzahaay

shemzahaay
4 years ago#2
No, it's a 6/9
any 55 that can prestige and dont is a level camper" - retroman20
mfw - http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_madmvw0bOt1qaujq5.jpg

User Info: CallMeSeeker

CallMeSeeker
4 years ago#3
Yes, that's the consensus we have reached.
i5-2500k @ 4.6GHz || Biostar TZ77B || Sapphire 6950 || Corsair Vengeance 8GB @ 1600MHz || Crucial M4 128GB || Spinpoint F3 1TB

User Info: Lerthyr

Lerthyr
4 years ago#4
It's a confirmed 6^-1 out of 10.
GT: Lerthyr
I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.

User Info: ihaveyahoorares

ihaveyahoorares
4 years ago#5
Maps: 3/10
Campaign :7/10
Zombies (I don't play it).
Multiplayer: 1/10 (it lost 7 points just based on the lag and the game being more connection based than anything).
Graphics: 5/10, they're 5 year old graphics. Maybe even 6+ years old.
Community: 4/10, you know who you are.
Gun Variety: 5/10, SMGs dominate. Only 4 LMG, Snipers, and Shotguns.

User Info: Sega9599

Sega9599
4 years ago#6
iamjosh308 posted...
By the community here?


What the? What's up with that sig?
Waiting for Mirrors Edge 2 and a new 'proper' Shining Force.

User Info: vonderviener

vonderviener
4 years ago#7
it's a shame how the guns, perks, and equipment in this game, are balanced for the most part, especially compared ot other call of duty's.

....but then the lag and connection issues are the worst, and really ruin the fun.

Campaign is cool....but playing on Veteran and being stuck with those stupid Strike Force missions that need to be completed for the ending ruins some of the fun as well.

User Info: L4ndoGr1ff1n

L4ndoGr1ff1n
4 years ago#8
ihaveyahoorares posted...
Maps: 3/10
Campaign :7/10
Zombies (I don't play it).
Multiplayer: 1/10 (it lost 7 points just based on the lag and the game being more connection based than anything).
Graphics: 5/10, they're 5 year old graphics. Maybe even 6+ years old.
Community: 4/10, you know who you are.
Gun Variety: 5/10, SMGs dominate. Only 4 LMG, Snipers, and Shotguns.


4/10 for community ? That's being abit generous.

User Info: rodman870

rodman870
4 years ago#9
I really don't understand the amount of hate that call of duty sequels gets. They're the same as the last one with a few new things and a few improvements.

No, a 6/10 game is Earth defence force 2017. Or maybe a movie-based game.

This game is a solid 9/10, but the brand is admittedly stale.

People love slapping a "1/10 for lag and bad multiplayer!" but seriously? It could be a hell of a lot worse. The graphics are great, the framerate is perfect, the story is fun and engaging, and the multiplayer and single player has some fun changes. The franchise could use some revitalization, but anyone who gives this anything below a 7 needs to rethink their review.
I like tacos more than burritos.
I'm going to eat a taco, then a burrito. Get it right people...

User Info: slipknotrox765

slipknotrox765
4 years ago#10
Honestly...it has the potential to be the best COD to date....
Nerds.
YOUTUBE: ITzzz AJ GT: ITzzz AJ
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. So this game is a confirmed 6/10?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived