Would the game be worse without bullet penetration

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Would the game be worse without bullet penetration

User Info: thebest99

thebest99
4 years ago#1
Yes or No? - Results (104 votes)
Yes, it would be worse. Camping would sky rocket and so would head glitching
76.92% (80 votes)
80
No, it would be a better experience...maybe
23.08% (24 votes)
24
This poll is now closed.
Do you think it would be for better or for worse if bullet penetration was removed from the game?
New Commentary! 11/22/12-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_iiDLS_2yE
GT: Dan Harkinz

User Info: fatclemenza

fatclemenza
4 years ago#2
If every wall in Hijacked wasn't made of foreskin then it wouldn't be as annoying
Advertising signs, they con you into thinking you’re the one
That can do what’s never been done, that can win what’s never been won

User Info: KabtheMentat

KabtheMentat
4 years ago#3
It would be better if the penetration wasn't as inconsistent as hell.

Cinder block wall? No problem. Pistol will blow through that. 3cm thick steel drums? Hell no, .50BMGs won't go through that.
Big Money. Big Women. Big Fun.
I don't have a cocaine habit, I just like the way it smells.

User Info: AWarAmp84

AWarAmp84
4 years ago#4
Bullet penetration is ok. What I find annoying is how you sometimes you can shoot through a giant garbage dumpster but you can't shiit through a piece of plywood.
Before you comment on one of my posts, please research the Dunning-Kruger effect. Best game of all time: Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory.

User Info: theLongR0D

theLongR0D
4 years ago#5
Nothing is any better without penetration

User Info: known2FAIL

known2FAIL
4 years ago#6
It would be WAY worse. Anyone remember Homefront? That is the main reason to me that the game was bad. If they made it where there was bullet penetration then it would instantly be 10x better.
I knew FMGs would be OP before the game came out:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/995751-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3/59204323

User Info: Telvanni_guard

Telvanni_guard
4 years ago#7
I think it would cause a lot more people to complain that they were behind a wall.
.
GamerTag: Te1vanni Guard
"Telvanni you would disprove everyone. :D"- Saint_of_Misery

User Info: chessmyantidrug

chessmyantidrug
4 years ago#8
One of my biggest gripes with the Halo series is lack of bullet penetration.

User Info: KabtheMentat

KabtheMentat
4 years ago#9
Mr. Harkinz, how much penetration do you like?
Big Money. Big Women. Big Fun.
I don't have a cocaine habit, I just like the way it smells.

User Info: CaffeineSnorter

CaffeineSnorter
4 years ago#10
From: KabtheMentat | #003
It would be better if the penetration wasn't as inconsistent as hell.

Cinder block wall? No problem. Pistol will blow through that. 3cm thick steel drums? Hell no, .50BMGs won't go through that.


Not sure about that friend. They make rounds in the .50 caliber that penetrate tank armor so I think the drums would be no problem.
Did you sleep with a moderator's girlfriend? without her consent?-red255
Keeping the community happy since 2011.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Would the game be worse without bullet penetration

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived