You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
The original point of our argument was you saying the ending didn't make sense, me saying why it did, and then you calling me a liar. You then stated blabbering on about Vanille and Fang's focus and how it was different out everyone else's. The reason I disagreed was because Barthandelus said all of their focuses were to destroy Cocoon. They wouldn't be branded by a Pulse Fal'Cie to stop Ragnarok, that doesn't make sense.
Now back to you saying how I'm wrong about the ending. Correct ending please.
That doesn't make sense at all, they were all branded at the same time in the same place for the same thing. They had the same focus, if you didn't follow that, then it isn't the games fault since that aspect of the plot is quite explicit.
This is what we are arguing about, Fang and Vanille's focus being the same as the rest of the parties. FYI, I never said you lied, I said you made it up, to your credit I like your ending better than the one we got, but everyone having the same focus is not logical.
Yeah, I didn't mean Vanille there, I meant the rest of the party, since it I know Vanille and Fang were branded beforehand.
As for their focuses being the same:
''After suffering defeat at the hands of the l'Cie, Barthandelus reveals that the l'Cie's Focus is to become Ragnarok and destroy Orphan, the fal'Cie that powers all the other fal'Cie in Cocoon and holds it afloat over Pulse. Barthandelus then claims that Serah's Focus was to gather them together to be made l'Cie so they could bring about Cocoon's destruction.''
That enough proof for you? A message from the actual game.