Wolfenstein 2 has you killing Nazis and KKK members in this new launch trailier

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 4
  3. Wolfenstein 2 has you killing Nazis and KKK members in this new launch trailier

User Info: theshoveller

theshoveller
1 month ago#361
WTGHookshot posted...
theshoveller posted...
Seriously, our politics has turned into Red Versus Blue, but without the comedy Grif and Caboose bring.

In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if the US broke out into civil war sometime again in our lifetimes if things keep worsening as is.

If it does, I'm calling the tank. You all heard me, I called it, so help you God if someone else takes my tank before I get to it!!!

I just hope there's not six pedals when there are only four directions.
Stupid, stupid rat creatures!!!

User Info: KINDERFELD

KINDERFELD
1 month ago#362
At one point in time it wasn't unlawful to kill Nazis in real.
the polyfilla way look strong in the weakness of the gaps

User Info: Rome218

Rome218
1 month ago#363
megaman1376 posted...
Rome218 posted...


This is the problem with socialism. They believe if outcome is not equal, something is wrong.

You automatically assume because the top 1% have accumulated so much wealth, they got it through bad means? Who cares how much they have?

Also, the 1% bracket fluctuates. People don't stay rich, just like people don't stay poor.

If I have 5 dollars and a man next to me has 50, it doesn't mean I was robbed. Socialists view everything this way. That is why they talk about redistributing wealth.

Things are great in the U.S. People are not starving to death, and even our poor are better off than the majority of the world's population. Imagine being poor in Susan, no food stamps and free ultrasounds and prenatal vitamins.

actually the problem with socialism is that people is greedy and always become a piramyd scheme fact is that capitalism is slightly better also there is very few movemen between classes you born poor you stay poor you born rich you stay rich (unless you are grossly incompetent) so i can undertand the appeal of socialims but is a lie and a scam . but i can see where the people is coming both sides the rich why i should help the poor this is my lifetime work and the poor why the rich have so much oportunities i can't go beyond my means


I respect your opinion. I believe socialism is a greedy ideology myself, and they feel it's okay to offer the fruits of other people's labor to keep things equal.

It kills an incentive to work hard if you're a doctor making as much as the guy mopping your floor.

There is greed in capitalism, but it does push people to be better through competition.

Video games are a great example.

It can be consoles trying to constantly one up each other, or competing franchises like cod and bf, we will see competition equal better quality, even if that's new things in the market like Overwatch.

I've never heard of rags to riches story in socialism, but I see it every day here. Just watch a sports game or a music video.

I also believe in a free market, we get better inventions.

That's just my opinion. If someone wants to tell me where a non free market socialist place is creating things we love, I'd love the opportunity to learn.

User Info: theshoveller

theshoveller
1 month ago#364
megaman1376 posted...
Rome218 posted...


This is the problem with socialism. They believe if outcome is not equal, something is wrong.

You automatically assume because the top 1% have accumulated so much wealth, they got it through bad means? Who cares how much they have?

Also, the 1% bracket fluctuates. People don't stay rich, just like people don't stay poor.

If I have 5 dollars and a man next to me has 50, it doesn't mean I was robbed. Socialists view everything this way. That is why they talk about redistributing wealth.

Things are great in the U.S. People are not starving to death, and even our poor are better off than the majority of the world's population. Imagine being poor in Susan, no food stamps and free ultrasounds and prenatal vitamins.

actually the problem with socialism is that people is greedy and always become a piramyd scheme fact is that capitalism is slightly better also there is very few movemen between classes you born poor you stay poor you born rich you stay rich (unless you are grossly incompetent) so i can undertand the appeal of socialims but is a lie and a scam . but i can see where the people is coming both sides the rich why i should help the poor this is my lifetime work and the poor why the rich have so much oportunities i can't go beyond my means

I've always seen this as the problem. On paper? Socialism and Communism look great. We all have everything, and we don't worry about if we do or don't have something, because in theory we can just go get it from our neighbor and return it, and likewise when they need something.

However, the problem is humans. We're greedy, like you said. We're lazy. We're selfish. Not everyone is, mind you - if my neighbor wanted a screwdriver to put together, say, a new entertainment center I'd give him a hand, as I would expect he would do for me. However - and I hate to say this, but we can see this already with some of the people on disability and welfare and whatnot - when given the option of "work for what you need, and you won't have to worry about it ever again" or "don't do anything, and you will be taken care of anyway," more people tend to pick the second option there than the first. The payout is the same, but one involves stress and work, while the other involves... well, lots of free time to do whatever the f*** you want to do. Play games, build models, whatever.

That's where the system falls apart. Those who work have to work harder for no increase in benefits to support those who don't. Those who give may not have others give back. Those who take may not give back. The equation becomes imbalanced, and hatred and resentment grows. Those who have because they work hate that they must give to those who do not contribute, and see no added benefits for keeping the system running.

It's one reason why I kinda like capitalism. I may always be a small fish on the low end of things, but if I work for something, I'm the one who owns that something. I'm the one who makes determinations on what I should do with it. I may never rise above my station, but what I have? I own. It is mine.
Stupid, stupid rat creatures!!!

User Info: Rome218

Rome218
1 month ago#365
That was a great post, theshoveller.

User Info: J-Fly

J-Fly
1 month ago#366
So they're still not satisfying my need to kill wabbits!
---
PSN: J-Fly

User Info: theshoveller

theshoveller
1 month ago#367
J-Fly posted...
So they're still not satisfying my need to kill wabbits!

I gotta say, after all this time, I'm surprised people with speech impediments or "lazy speech issues" haven't tried to get Warner Brothers to change how Elmer Fudd or Porky Pig talk.
Stupid, stupid rat creatures!!!

User Info: Battleship_Gray

Battleship_Gray
1 month ago#368
ARPG_Master posted...

right you just said theyre both bad but didnt say if one was worse which makes them look equal by omission.


Nah, that's just you reading more into a simple statement than what was actually there. I made no qualitative statement as to worse, better or equal. I also didn't say both sides were bad but that there are bad elements on either side. A subtle, but distinct, difference.
Recent-ish art MVC Infinite Edition: http://i.imgur.com/I7FQq30.png http://i.imgur.com/UQiWXqD.png http://i.imgur.com/ndMiEeJ.png http://i.imgur.com/vvf9Hiz.png

User Info: ARPG_Master

ARPG_Master
1 month ago#369
theshoveller posted...
ARPG_Master posted...
Battleship_Gray posted...
ARPG_Master posted...
its not the equivalent scenario that you would lead people to believe it is.

I never claimed it was. I remarked that there are hypocrites and extremists on either side which is a factual statement. I never remarked on who is worse than whom.

right you just said theyre both bad but didnt say if one was worse which makes them look equal by omission.

In what world does that even apply? Not mentioning if one is worse than the other means that you can't make a determination if one is worse than the other. If I said that I have two numbers that add up to 20, solve for X and Y where X+Y=20, what numbers would you guess? They could both be 10, they could be 1 and 19, or any other combination of numbers that add up to 20. With the information given, you cannot make any assessment about the two numbers short of they add up to 20. They could be -20 and 40 for all we know.

He didn't make a comparison. Thus, no comparison should be made by anyone reading it.

that would be a great comparison if we were talking about something that cant be quantified but were not. how many people from the left are members of racist white nationalist groups like the kkk or neo nazis? how many people from the left are members of fanatical religious groups like the westboro baptist church? how many people from the left are members of gun crazy local militia groups? how many nut job conspiracy freak personalities like alex jones or rush limbaugh do you see coming from the left? just face it most of the worst that humanity has to offer tends to come from the right. all the right can ever do is bring up antifa or cry about sjws. fighting facism and wanting social justice are so f***ing awful right? right up there with the racism and ultra fanatical behavior you seen on the right. its pretty f***ing easy to make an assessment if youre not living in total denial of the facts.

User Info: ARPG_Master

ARPG_Master
1 month ago#370
Battleship_Gray posted...
ARPG_Master posted...

right you just said theyre both bad but didnt say if one was worse which makes them look equal by omission.


Nah, that's just you reading more into a simple statement than what was actually there. I made no qualitative statement as to worse, better or equal. I also didn't say both sides were bad but that there are bad elements on either side. A subtle, but distinct, difference.

so you made an empty statement and now youre resorting to splitting hairs. ok thanks for the heads up.
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 4
  3. Wolfenstein 2 has you killing Nazis and KKK members in this new launch trailier

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived