Titanfall Metacritic Prediction Thread

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. Titanfall Metacritic Prediction Thread

User Info: 82xeno

3 years ago#31
High 70 Low 80.

I think a near launch date review embargo is not working in it's favor, likewise I trust most reviewers to see past hype nowadays, especially after what Ghosts obtained in MC.

User Info: lunaticcore

3 years ago#32
The no single player thing is stupid. They should also deduct points from the game for not being a 2D platformer, a simulation or an open world sandbox. The game shouldn't be rated for what it isn't trying to accomplish. Minecraft has a great Metacritic score despite not shooting for all the same B.S. bulletpoints your average triple A game is shooting for. Titanfall is trying to offer a specific product for people that usually don't bother with single player.

Everybody always cries that all these games are adding in pointless modes to games that shouldn't have then, then they cry that every game copies COD, and now we are sitting here trying to punish a game for doing something different and focusing the polish and quality where they think it should be.

User Info: CowboyBebopCrew

3 years ago#33
Xbox Live GT: CowboyBebopCrew ; PSN: CowboyBebopCrew

User Info: krystyla

3 years ago#34
Fade2black001 posted...
52 is my score.

All you people are putting this game way over perspective

You realise everything beneath 70 is considered a dupe, everything beneath 80 bad and 50 is barely playable.

optimistic 88
FC: 4227 - 1514- 7752 IGN:Mara PSN: JudasInHell Gamertag: Schreckstoff
Written by Surface Pro 2 256GB

User Info: stawg007

3 years ago#35
High 80s, 88 or 89

User Info: Fade2black001

3 years ago#36
Is that how it works with them?
We're Americans! We don't quit just because we're wrong.
We just keep doing the wrong thing until it turns out right.

User Info: Exodus_Prime

3 years ago#37
Fade2black001 posted...
ILikesCheese posted...
Jx1010 posted...
I say a 98 or 99.

People like this crack me up.

Insane expectations outside of reality based on a product they haven't even tested yet.

Too funny.


So true

It is his opinion though. Still it doesn't mean we can't laugh at it though. lol

I laugh at both of you while eating a pretzel.
"Trolls are the dudebros of Gamefaqs. They just don't realize it." - curtland
Xbox One-PlayStation 4-Xbox 360-PS3-Vita

User Info: OldSkoolGamer04

3 years ago#38
86. I think the biggest complaints will be the graphics and "lack" of content.

User Info: Masterchief5525

3 years ago#39
Evel138 posted...
91 seems reasonable.

No doubt there will be a few 3rd rate fan sites metacritic inexplicably decides to factor in that give it a 60 just to generate some web traffic.

^This which always makes the average reviews no longer reliable for people that base their buying on the average reviews.
i7-4770k | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | 8gb G.Skill 1600mhz | 2TB WD HDD | Asus Z87-A

User Info: PDAWG27

3 years ago#40
I would say mid 90 range. People seem to forget all of the E3 awards this game won. It was a best in show then and has only gotten better. Those awards are not given to crappy games.
PSN/XBL: Leatherface17
3DS FC: 3411-1842-1031
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. Titanfall Metacritic Prediction Thread

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived