This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Gen V really shouldn't have been a reboot.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Gen V really shouldn't have been a reboot.

User Info: Gastroid

Gastroid
4 years ago#1
Now that Gen VI is coming out and it is looking like it'll be a mover and a shaker game, looking back, Gen V was really ill suited to be a reboot. I would have much preferred the whole new region in the new spot in the timeline with a whole new set of Pokemon to go with the new game of the new console with new graphics.

That isn't to say that Gen VI can't or won't do the same thing (although it probably won't be as disconnected with how old Pokemon have been shown), but two in a row doesn't really have the same effect, you know?
Judicoid
Judicator-variant Android

User Info: VoidBeyond

VoidBeyond
4 years ago#2
It wasn't a reboot? It was just a throw back to the originals.
GT: Dethrow2112
PSN: DuodecimKnight

User Info: Chacronic

Chacronic
4 years ago#3
I don't think reboot means what you think it means. Pretty sure many of the ingame text makes gen V to be set years after the other gens.
"Trouble keeps you running faster, Save the planet from disaster!" ~ Sonic Boom
If they turn the tables, just flip them over! - Aegis P4Arena

User Info: Gastroid

Gastroid
4 years ago#4
It was as close to one as Pokemon will probably get, and so is generally referred to as a reboot. It isn't a real reboot, but certainly one of sorts that disconnected itself from the previous games a lot more than the others.
Judicoid
Judicator-variant Android

User Info: SlimeStack

SlimeStack
4 years ago#5
Ruby & Sapphire were more of a reboot. :S
Professional Chespin fanboy.
Currently banned from: complaining about IVs

User Info: jayman7

jayman7
4 years ago#6
Gastroid posted...
It was as close to one as Pokemon will probably get, and so is generally referred to as a reboot.


The THIRD gen is the closest Pokemon's likely to get to being a reboot. It's the first (and so far only) time they broke compatibility and made sweeping changes to the underlying system.
Creator of Jay's Journey (see quote!)
"It's not ten years old! Therefore, it sucks!" - Nostalgia whores everywhere

User Info: overmaxx

overmaxx
4 years ago#7
It wasn't a reboot.

Technically, the reboot is gen 3, because it completely severed the previous games from continuity. As in Pokemon in Gen 1 and 2 cannot move to Gen 3 and forward.

User Info: kakashik99992

kakashik99992
4 years ago#8
R/S were a reboot while B/W weren't
My pokemon run http://thepunchlineismachismo.com/archives/150

User Info: MM125

MM125
4 years ago#9
Ignoring the terminology debate, I have to agree with the TC's actual point.
Oooh, MM, he be tryin' you, dawg. He be tryin' you. Best mind you biiiiiiiz-ness. ~KMA
*triple z snap* ~AluminumTicket

User Info: Gastroid

Gastroid
4 years ago#10
It's funny how on the B/W boards for years I saw the term thrown around without debate and it's now that people want to debate it. After dozens of topics, "reboot of sorts" is ingrained into my mind.
Judicoid
Judicator-variant Android
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. Gen V really shouldn't have been a reboot.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived