This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

I think Noivern needs to be pure flying

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. I think Noivern needs to be pure flying

User Info: MechaKirby

MechaKirby
4 years ago#1
Everything that flies is either part normal, or part dragon.

We need more pure Flying types, no dragon crutches.
GTag/PSN: MechaknightX [][] Go Watch Monty Oum's RWBY series!!
Currently working on a Vesperia Translation Playthrough!!

User Info: NewMoonShadow

NewMoonShadow
4 years ago#2
Pure Flying doesn't exist because it's a modifier type. It's meant to augment a Pokemon, not be the entirety of what it is. Tornadus was only Pure Flying because it was an ethereal being of wind.

User Info: paipr

paipr
4 years ago#3
hmmm...id be ok with that. be more ok with noivern being a new type combo besides flying/dragon (which is kinda a new type combo cause this is the first time the combo has gone in that order all other times they where dragon/flying)

the order of the typing almost makes me wonder if its prevo stages could be pure flying.

dragon/poison could have been interesting.
dandelion + flabebe + fairy wind = saddest moment in pokemon.
3ds fc. jd, 0602-6823-9646 or 0146.9112.0071

User Info: MechaKirby

MechaKirby
4 years ago#4
NewMoonShadow posted...
Pure Flying doesn't exist because it's a modifier type. It's meant to augment a Pokemon, not be the entirety of what it is. Tornadus was only Pure Flying because it was an ethereal being of wind.


?

I think its should lose that purpose in favor to removing Normal types with flying. That or change Flying to Wind. Augmenting a pokemon is ok, but I don't like seeing normal as a "base type" for these flying creatures
GTag/PSN: MechaknightX [][] Go Watch Monty Oum's RWBY series!!
Currently working on a Vesperia Translation Playthrough!!

User Info: nightblade_hawk

nightblade_hawk
4 years ago#5
Noivern is the ugliest Mon of Gen 6 so far and I'm just going to catch it and put it on the PC to rot.

User Info: paipr

paipr
4 years ago#6
NewMoonShadow posted...
Pure Flying doesn't exist because it's a modifier type. It's meant to augment a Pokemon, not be the entirety of what it is. Tornadus was only Pure Flying because it was an ethereal being of wind.


modifier type? i mean i get what your saying, but honestly....? technically there is no reason for a modifier type, let alone the fact that would make flying the only modifier type.
dandelion + flabebe + fairy wind = saddest moment in pokemon.
3ds fc. jd, 0602-6823-9646 or 0146.9112.0071

User Info: MagneticSpark

MagneticSpark
4 years ago#7
imo the problem with the flying type is that its too vague, kinda like the sound type.

User Info: MechaKirby

MechaKirby
4 years ago#8
MagneticSpark posted...
imo the problem with the flying type is that its too vague, kinda like the sound type.


opt in for wind type
GTag/PSN: MechaknightX [][] Go Watch Monty Oum's RWBY series!!
Currently working on a Vesperia Translation Playthrough!!

User Info: paipr

paipr
4 years ago#9
MagneticSpark posted...
imo the problem with the flying type is that its too vague, kinda like the sound type.


true. its a funny type cause it covers pokemon that are airborne, but not all airborne pokemon, and also not all flying types are airborne.
dandelion + flabebe + fairy wind = saddest moment in pokemon.
3ds fc. jd, 0602-6823-9646 or 0146.9112.0071

User Info: Oreno5267

Oreno5267
4 years ago#10
novern could well be the bat of g6
The epitome and pinnacle of anime: http://imgur.com/f29l8mo.gif
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon X
  3. I think Noivern needs to be pure flying

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived