Are SM3DW's levels short and disappointing like SM3DL's?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Super Mario 3D World
  3. Are SM3DW's levels short and disappointing like SM3DL's?

User Info: iGenesis

iGenesis
3 years ago#1
Nintendo did a lot of damage control regarding SM3DL's 30-second levels:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-10-28-nintendo-super-mario-3d-land-is-like-a-hamburger

I want to see real levels (2+ minutes long per mission should be a bare minimum), because Nintendo is capable of it and anything less reflects poor effort, no matter what kind of bulls*** they use to justify it. G1 and G2's levels were generally elaborate enough.

Also, does SM3DW require anything stupidly repetitive to inflate game length, like beating every stage with every character?
GameFAQs.com: You make the content; CBS makes the money.
Year of the PS3: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 | Year of the PS4: 2014-

User Info: playingbelgian

playingbelgian
3 years ago#2
Beating every stage with one character grants you a special stamp for that character, but only stamps (so far). Multiplayer seems to count towards that, though.

User Info: iGenesis

iGenesis
3 years ago#3
playingbelgian posted...
Beating every stage with one character grants you a special stamp for that character, but only stamps (so far). Multiplayer seems to count towards that, though.


oh lawd
GameFAQs.com: You make the content; CBS makes the money.
Year of the PS3: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 | Year of the PS4: 2014-

User Info: AhnoldDood

AhnoldDood
3 years ago#4
iGenesis topic.

And lol at thinking there's "missions" in this game. How far out of the loop are you?

User Info: llcoolyea

llcoolyea
3 years ago#5
im happy you gotta beat tit with everyone and even happier they have a way of tracking it.

User Info: ConradimusPrime

ConradimusPrime
3 years ago#6
I didn't find anything about 3d land disappointing unless trying to directly compare it to galaxy.
I liked 3d land far better than 64 *GASP HERESY!*

User Info: StarBladeEdge

StarBladeEdge
3 years ago#7
it has better levels than knack - trust me
Boujng ! I always there're loch , it steppapost drunk! Dr. Boing (77JahRaspFanSonic) = Don't touch my iPhat , boys !

User Info: donkeyjack

donkeyjack
3 years ago#8
Damn 64 aged that badly?
"Live on the run police paying me to give in my gun/Trick the wisdom with the system that imprisoned my son." - Nas Esco Circa '95

User Info: Redd_White

Redd_White
3 years ago#9
Wow, seven posts filled with damage control and without any answer ? That tells a lot.


Anyway, there are tons of vids on youtube of various levels from the game. The players do their best to make them seem longer by fooling around with the multiplayer aspect and the power ups, but you can definitely tell that the levels are extremely short. They seem longer than 3D land, but not by much.

User Info: AhnoldDood

AhnoldDood
3 years ago#10
Redd_White posted...
Wow, seven posts filled with damage control and without any answer ? That tells a lot.


Anyway, there are tons of vids on youtube of various levels from the game. The players do their best to make them seem longer by fooling around with the multiplayer aspect and the power ups, but you can definitely tell that the levels are extremely short. They seem longer than 3D land, but not by much.


Except they aren't, try again.

And thanks for misusing "damage control" like most of the users on GameFAQs.
  1. Boards
  2. Super Mario 3D World
  3. Are SM3DW's levels short and disappointing like SM3DL's?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived