This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Saint's Row 4 - Horrible PC Port

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Saint's Row 4 - Horrible PC Port

User Info: Panopictonguy

4 years ago#61
TimePharaoh posted...
MonerMoner posted...
TimePharaoh posted...
MonerMoner posted...
TimePharaoh posted...
Hey brah see a pattern yet

I do, the pattern I see is that you never post anything useful... brah.

Hmm, sounds like you need to get your eyes checked?

I told him both that it's not a bad port, and that the problem is his computer. Seems pretty helpful. Meanwhile what you contributed to him was....telling me I didn't contribute.

Your helpfulness is astounding, keep up the good work.

Instead of being so hateful, you could say "that cpu is holding you back" instead of "Lolz scrub computer", I know you're a smart guy so I guess you get off on spewing your verbal diarrhea, or you have some kind of social disorder. Either way you know you're being a dick, so continue your delusions of being "helpful"... brah.

Me being a dick or not when I reply doesn't somehow negate it's helpfulness, just like you not helping him at all (but doing it in a nice way I guess?) is entirely irrelevant and less helpful.

It didn't help.
Oh, you thought they made this game for you? You clearly bought the wrong game.

User Info: TheFeralWarrior

4 years ago#62
johnny_pay posted...
i get solid 60 @ max settings on my pc
Gt & Steam: TheFeralWarrior
Member of PC Master Race

User Info: HarvestMonkey8

4 years ago#63
30-45 fps
AMD FX 6350 HD 6850


All on Max apart from AA which is at 4x

Oh, and no crashes thus far.
TC is doing it wrong.

User Info: LazyyAmerican

4 years ago#64
Yes it is true...the benchmarks are significantly lower on AMD side....but I guess you get what you pay for...well at least at the time I put together this computer. It was significantly less thanks to good ol AMD and plays games well enough. Stop whining that you can't get constant 60 fps everywhere if you aren't willing to shell out the cash.
Quite the coexist in a world that ostracizes you into obscurity

User Info: JessofBlades

4 years ago#65
The_Undying_84 posted...
That isn't surprising, 2 and 3 were also horribly optimized on PC. Even 2 is pretty much unplayable regardless of settings on my PC. 3 is actually slightly better (still terrible though).

sound like you have a garbage pc. 40 minimum, usually 60+ on ultra with 3570k and 560ti for both 3 and 4 for me

User Info: MUD VIPER

4 years ago#66
Win 7 64bit

AMD Phenom II X4 955 Processor (4 CPUs), ~3.2GHz

AMD Radeon HD 7870

Game set to max, been playing for 30hrs smooth as butter.
Console bug testing has been outsourced to gamers now. For $60 you too can become a game tester.

User Info: GreenMage7

4 years ago#67
Hey look guys, this guy here can't run TF2 and gets 24 fps avg and dips to 6 in it:

See that "peasant" processor? Who can't run TF2?

An i7 and a 660 and sometimes he drops below 10 fps in games like World of Warcraft made 8 years ago? I guess Intel = Finished???!

Am I doing it right? It's not a problem with them, it's definitely the hardware in general. I must be doing it right. =)

User Info: brainlack

4 years ago#68
TimePharaoh posted...
GreenMage7 posted...
DarkZV2Beta posted...
Yeah, see, this is why AMD FX CPUs are no good for gaming. They're fine for some games, but as soon as you get any kind of sandbox gameplay, they choke and die. Every time.

That's odd because he's the only one having such bad problems. You'd think someone who has been around so long would know broad generalizations are usually wrong. And I didn't know over 90% of games on the market is some games now. That's interesting.

And I'd think someone who has been around as long as you would know that


everyday I see amd= finish did amd finished anything other than a hello world in visual basic?
playing re6 with 8x sparse grid ss with 32xs(2x2 ss + 8 ms)+ mixed sample x128 + 32 forced anisotropic then I hear ps4 is powerful than my pc

User Info: DV8ingSources

4 years ago#69
AMD is awesome now. Not sure why people are still hatin. They have really smartened up and fixed most of the complaints I've had with them in the past. Processors are still weaker alternatives overall, but their gpu side is nice.
2500k @ 4.4 | P8Z68-V Pro | H80 | 8GB | 670 | 256 ssd | 6Tb hdd | Win 8 64bit | ax1200w | BD burner | cm690II
Steam: DV8ing1

User Info: Snight01

4 years ago#70
Shockingly it runs bad on amd hardware.
Worst Optimized PC Games
Diablo 3 (SSD Needed), Metro 2033. Crysis 3, Slender The Arrival, GTA4
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Saint's Row 4 - Horrible PC Port

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived