This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Watch dogs specs may not be that demanding afterall

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Watch dogs specs may not be that demanding afterall

User Info: Hypnotizer

Hypnotizer
3 years ago#1
http://www.incgamers.com/2013/10/watch-dogs-pc-specs-may-demanding

Just saw this, interesting.
Peace and love!

User Info: Darkking4

Darkking4
3 years ago#2
I know a decent bit of french so I too can confirm that yes, the dev says that the real specs will be lower.
EVGA GTX 760 - i5 750 - G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600 - WD Caviar Black 1TB - Antec 300 Illusion- Gigabyte P55A-UD3- Antec Earthwatts 650W- AOC 21.5" 1920x1080

User Info: Nicodimus

Nicodimus
3 years ago#3
i3 recommended for ultra confirmed!
Intel i5 4670k | Corsair 16GB DDR3 | Gigabyte GTX 770 4GB | ASUS 27" 1440p
Corsair 480GB SSD | WD 4TB HDD | Fractal Design R4 | Corsair 750MX | Win7Ult 64

User Info: TheC0ndemnedOne

TheC0ndemnedOne
3 years ago#4
This reminds me of when the "requirements" for Max Payne 3 first came out.
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/55488_o.gif
http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/

User Info: DerPancake

DerPancake
3 years ago#5
That sounds disappointing.
Steam/Origin: DerPancake

User Info: Kokuei05

Kokuei05
3 years ago#6
I'll let you know how well it runs on a 2008 PC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkbNvrzp9Zk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFC-I16ByiI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cNMJVCcbUI

User Info: Darkking4

Darkking4
3 years ago#7
Why would it be disappointing if more people can play the game well or even on ultra.
I don't understand "enthusiasts" who make topics about i5 being outdated and bragging about their i7s and those who like games to be overly demanding. If a game is too demanding, it won't sell, if a developer can't make enough profits then future games will be affected or won't even be made.
EVGA GTX 760 - i5 750 - G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600 - WD Caviar Black 1TB - Antec 300 Illusion- Gigabyte P55A-UD3- Antec Earthwatts 650W- AOC 21.5" 1920x1080

User Info: Voelger

Voelger
3 years ago#8
Hey darkking, how does your system work for you? How well do you run games?

I'm thinking about building a similar one
Mythlogic-Pollux 1612, Clevo P150em, i7-3720QM, 2GB GTX 680m, 16g DDR3, 128 MSata drive, 750 7200rpm HDD
PowerFAQs 1.10

User Info: Nicodimus

Nicodimus
3 years ago#9
Darkking4 posted...
Why would it be disappointing if more people can play the game well or even on ultra.
I don't understand "enthusiasts" who make topics about i5 being outdated and bragging about their i7s and those who like games to be overly demanding. If a game is too demanding, it won't sell, if a developer can't make enough profits then future games will be affected or won't even be made.


They're just afraid it will look like WoW.
Intel i5 4670k | Corsair 16GB DDR3 | Gigabyte GTX 770 4GB | ASUS 27" 1440p
Corsair 480GB SSD | WD 4TB HDD | Fractal Design R4 | Corsair 750MX | Win7Ult 64

User Info: Darkking4

Darkking4
3 years ago#10
My system so far has taken everything I have thrown at it and I have gotten max settings at 1920x1080 with a great framerate.
The only thing that has ever given me unsatisfactory performance on dis rig is the unoptimized bf4 beta. My rig runs stuff like crysis 1, crysis 2, hawken, saints row the third, far cry 3, sleeping dogs on max perfectly.
EVGA GTX 760 - i5 750 - G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600 - WD Caviar Black 1TB - Antec 300 Illusion- Gigabyte P55A-UD3- Antec Earthwatts 650W- AOC 21.5" 1920x1080
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Watch dogs specs may not be that demanding afterall

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived