This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Video gaming is FINISHED (no, really... probably)

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Video gaming is FINISHED (no, really... probably)

User Info: sonicteam2k1

3 years ago#21
I wish and hopes it does. These publishers need another lesson, but they won't and i don't see a crash happening.
See The Game Collection

User Info: MortalDanger

3 years ago#22
Well, I got a backlog to get me through the apocalypse. So as long as the power stays on I should be good.
God Bless America.

User Info: TheSchref

3 years ago#23
KillerTruffle posted...
Sega9599 posted...
One of the main reasons was the poor quality of the games. ET for example. No matter how much you hate COD, I'd rather spend $40 on that game rather than $40 on ET.

No game released these days is that terrible and misleading in its advertising.

The developer is a scumbag liar and the game was pure garbage on release, but everyone I know that went and bought it a few months ago when it was on sale said that it was a solid game. My brother and his friends put about 100 hours into it.

I won't buy it because I refuse to support such a douche, but according to a lot of people who went back and gave it a chance, it isn't a bad game (anymore).

User Info: KillerTruffle

3 years ago#24
I wasn't implying so much that it was still as bad as it was, but the dev utterly lied about it and scammed people left and right with it while it was still a buggy, worthless piece of s***. I don't care how much it might have improved since then, I'm never touching that game.

It was just the first game that came to mind when I saw mention of "false advertising" and "terrible." heh
"How do I get rid of a Trojan Horse?" -Sailor_Kakashi
"Leave it outside the gates of Troy overnight." -Davel23

User Info: arleas

3 years ago#25
From: JKatarn | #019
Of course but you's "" usually writes some very interesting articles, but yeah, I wouldn't expect them to be the leaders in gaming news. I usually go to for stuff like "Top 5 things that you have in your kitchen that could kill you" or "Top 10 events that nearly ended the world" or something like that.

User Info: d209999

3 years ago#26
mycousinvinnie posted...
AMD = Finished

The only right answer
*under construction*

User Info: KillerTruffle

3 years ago#27 is definitely not what I'd call a "hard news source" or anything - it's an entertainment website. But this article actually did make some good points I thought were relevant.
"How do I get rid of a Trojan Horse?" -Sailor_Kakashi
"Leave it outside the gates of Troy overnight." -Davel23

User Info: johnny_pay

3 years ago#28
why is the tldr version longer than the long version?
The cranky hermit 3 years ago#29
I read that article earlier today. The observations are generally accurate, but it simply doesn't follow that they would lead to another crash. They've been true for years, and what it's led to is creative stagnation, and endless big budget sequels designed by committee to appeal to as broad a market as possible with no risk taking or innovation. It's not unlike pop music - they're calculated, soulless products, but they do meet a basic quality threshold, and are virtually guaranteed to turn a profit.

Probably the biggest difference between games today and before the '83 crash is that the developers know what they're doing. The late Atari 2600 era was flooded with bug-ridden, virtually unplayable pieces of crap that nobody wanted to play. Nowadays programming is easy, game design is driven by tried-and-true formulas, and endless playtesting ensures plenty of broad appeal and that nobody gets stuck or frustrated for too long. Marketing is very good at anticipating market trends, and has techniques for influencing them. The unlicensed Atari 2600 developers didn't have any of this - they just made stuff quickly and tried to sell it.
Year-by-year analysis of the finest gaming has to offer, and (eventually) more!

User Info: frag_bait

3 years ago#30
MahoganyTooth92 posted...
Video games are too big of an industry to just disappear.

A crash? Yeah, that's a big possibility. I actually weirdly kinda want it to happen, so that we can finally have a change of pace.

Yeah, it's not like millions of people born into the video game generation and have no other hobby besides games will suddenly give them up because some big publishers decide they can't afford to make AAA games anymore. Someone will fill the niche, indies, a few sure-fire AAA franchises like Elder Scrolls, pay-to-play, etc. Games are not going to go away.

And if development tools continue to improve, indies will continue to improve in graphics and content because one or two developers can do so much more than they used to be able to. Now one programmer, one graphics artist, and one sound composer can make a SNES quality game in a year or two. Who knows? Maybe in 20 years five people will be enough to make a game like Skyrim. That's probably a stretch, but expect some technically impressive games made by very small teams.
I am a well-known troll. Please don't fall for my shenanigans.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Video gaming is FINISHED (no, really... probably)

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived