This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

does crysis 3 suck?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. does crysis 3 suck?

User Info: Grey_Asakura

Grey_Asakura
3 years ago#1
i heard its a lot worse than 2
http://giant.gfycat.com/ImmediateFakeDotterel.gif, http://giant.gfycat.com/HarmoniousAdvancedGalapagospenguin.gif, http://i.imgur.com/RcF6kKo.gif

User Info: brotrrwinner

brotrrwinner
3 years ago#2
They're both well-realized games but for some reason they couldn't hold my attention to the end. And it's not like I have a short attention span, I finished both Metro 2033 and Last Light twice and was still hungry for more (I also finished the original Crysis twice or so, great game)
September 21st, 2008
Never forget

User Info: ryouma17

ryouma17
3 years ago#3
if you want great graphics with linear stages and poor gameplay, then crysis 3 is the perfect game for you
Ronnie O'Neal McLendon
08/09/1960 - 11/16/2011

User Info: EpicKingdom_

EpicKingdom_
3 years ago#4
I really enjoyed the original Crysis, but 2 & 3 have always been there as a graphical showcase for me... seriously, I only boot them up for benchmarks.
http://i.imgur.com/bY3txRa.png

User Info: Bmvc1

Bmvc1
3 years ago#5
All Crysis games suck. They look good doing it, though.

User Info: kingoffps

kingoffps
3 years ago#6
Crysis 2 and 3 are solid shooters. Nothing spectacular, and the sense of scope from the first Crysis is gone. But they are competent games and are by no means bad.

Crysis 1 (and to an extent Warhead) was much better.
i7 920, MSI X58 Platinum, 12GB DDR3 PC10700, HIS IceQ 7950, 240GB Agility 3 SSD, Arctic Power 950W PSU
Username was created back when FPS games were cool...

User Info: Mackorov

Mackorov
3 years ago#7
I never enjoyed any of the Crysis games if not for the visuals. Neither Crysis 1 was any better for me. So what if the world if more non-linear? The objective still points you in just one direction. There's never any real incentives to explore the rest of the map because of this

User Info: WyzeGye

WyzeGye
3 years ago#8
Crisis 3s multiplayer is great if you stick to the cell vs rebel modes. Anything with the body suit makes kills take forever.
http://puu.sh/8hi9W/9082c43c30.png

User Info: Tommy2GoGo

Tommy2GoGo
3 years ago#9
Crysis 3 was a pretty decent game.

I really enjoyed it.
Story was awesome. Nothing new or innovating.
The suit was ruined though.

You no longer feel like a 'super human' like you did in the first game.
Super speed is pretty much just 'regular sprinting' in any other game.

Overall, If you've kept up with the Crysis series, I'd say get it.
It's better than 2.

Warhead is the best though.

User Info: nonexistinghero

nonexistinghero
3 years ago#10
ryouma17 posted...
if you want great graphics with linear stages and poor gameplay, then crysis 3 is the perfect game for you


Yeah. And the early parts of Crysis 1 were good, but that's it. The games are pretty much all graphics, shallow gameplay.
Read the mania: http://www.fanfiction.net/~nonexistinghero
In SA2, it's Super Sonic and Hyper Shadow.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. does crysis 3 suck?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived