This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Is the AMD FX 6300 bad for gaming?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Is the AMD FX 6300 bad for gaming?

User Info: Terrorknight3

3 years ago#1
It seems pretty highly rated on Amazon and newegg.

User Info: jedinat

3 years ago#2
Why don't you google it. You'll find benchmarks, comparisons, all kinds of useful and pertinent info and it's all instantly available to you right now.

User Info: Jeffw88

3 years ago#3
Fx6300 is the only AMD processor I personally think it's worth its price over any other AMD processors for gaming.
Just because you think it is right, it doesn't make it right for everyone. Even you.
You're being trolled only if you let them.

User Info: DarkZV2Beta

3 years ago#4
Not exactly. It's certainly terrible for a lot of kinds of gaming, like if you play competitive online games. For casual/light/console gaming, though, it's not bad.
god invented extension cords. -elchris79
Starcraft 2 has no depth or challenge -GoreGross

User Info: Brass_Eye

3 years ago#5
Works lovely - my old build had one and I gave it to my brother and he's still using it.

Excellent CPU for the price and runs games well.

User Info: Pengu1n

3 years ago#6
DarkZV2Beta posted...
Not exactly. It's certainly terrible for a lot of kinds of gaming, like if you play competitive online games. For casual/light/console gaming, though, it's not bad.

Really? I have played loads of high end games online with mine and had no issues. I have also had no issues whatsoever with ANY pc games i have played using it either.

I don't know where people on this board get their info about AMD from but it's all wrong.

User Info: Master_Bass

3 years ago#7
It's not good for games that benefit from one or two strong cores. It's not that bad, though, but I honestly wouldn't buy one. I will say it can be decent competition in applications that take advantage of all of its cores.
Many Bothans died to bring you this post.

User Info: PhilOnDez

3 years ago#8
Best case scenario it's a hair faster than an i3. Worst case scenario it's 30-60% slower. It's true that it's unlocked but for what it would cost you to get any solid clocks out of it (more than just a barebones board since AMD boards house the VRMs where intel has them right on the CPU, you'll also need a cooler) you'd be better off just buying a locked i5 and a compatible cheap intel chipset board.

At the end of the day most games are GPU bound and that's not going to change whether you get an i3 or 6300 or 8 core extreme edition i7. CPU intensive games like SC2, modded minecraft, Civ V, etc etc, are going to crawl when it comes to the wire (civ v is a bit of a special case, the frame rates won't actually dip. NPC turns will just start taking 10-15 minutes vs 5-10 on the comparable intel part).

Most games aren't that heavily threaded, including the ones I listed above who benefit from 3, 1, 2 strong threads respectively, there is the occasional BF4 that does benefit greatly from extra threads but apparently it has issues with 6 thread processors, or did at least, so that doesn't score many points for the 6300. Personally, I'll take the i3 every time for a gaming rig since it's better in most situations (even if it's not noticeably better), not that far behind when it isn't ahead, uses half as much power, and has integrated graphics to fall back on if something happens to your gpu.
Every time I try to go where I really wanna be it's already where I am, 'cuz I'm already there
XBL, PSN, Steam, Origin, BSN, GFAQs, MC: PhilOnDez

User Info: BannedMom

3 years ago#9
The FX-6300 is the best budget processor AMD has but if you have money then the i5 would be a better buy.
I5-4440 - Asrock H81M - Zotac 750Ti - CM N200 = Future Emulation and Gaming Build @ 1600 x 900
PS3_PS2_PS1 Master.

User Info: tiger8191

3 years ago#10
I've played complete civ5 games and found no instance of npc turns taking even 2 minutes. But hey, I'm probably wrong since I've only been using an un clocked 6300 for a year and these other guys never had one in there PC(s).

Is a locked i5 better. Ummm...durrrr of course it is. Is it the best CPU out there. Of course not. At a certain budget it is a solid choice. But I read some crazy things about it that I've never once experienced. I have 144 games on steam. My 6300/7850 budget loser build plays all at least on high. My twitch sn is same as steam if you want to see what games a 6300 can play.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. Is the AMD FX 6300 bad for gaming?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived