This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

30fps is superior to 60fps

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. 30fps is superior to 60fps

User Info: chandl34

3 years ago#71
No thanks, I prefer still-frame games.
... even on Earth Mode.

User Info: Master_Bass

3 years ago#72
Many Bothans died to bring you this post.

User Info: Worknofun370

3 years ago#73
Rixgear posted...
For example Shadow of the Colossus and Okami both would look signifantly worst at 60 frames

It would look different. Worse is subjective.
hasa diga eebowai

User Info: GooberSD

3 years ago#74
So many problems with this topic.

Nex-Gen63759 posted...
Facts on why 30fps is better.

-Cinematic experience
-60 FPS looks fake Expand?
-60 FPS only benefits Fighting/Racing/Online FPS games Again, expand.
-60 FPS makes games look worse visually It's like you got these facts off of wikipedia.
-30 FPS makes makes games look graphically better Name examples of games that were released in both FPS and prove it.
-I can't see the difference at all Your personal reflection doesn't matter. We want FACTS. These are not facts. No basis whatsoever.
-Back in my day people didn't care about graphics We're not discussing graphics. This is FPS.
-60 FPS doesn't matter because gameplay matters more ... how old are you?

User Info: GooberSD

3 years ago#75
Worknofun370 posted...
Rixgear posted...
For example Shadow of the Colossus and Okami both would look signifantly worst at 60 frames

It would look different. Worse is subjective.

Ever played SotC remastered? Higher frame rate, and the game looks 10x better. -.- This was directed toward Rixgear. Not Worknofun370

User Info: Worknofun370

3 years ago#76
GooberSD posted...
Ever played SotC remastered?

Oh snap! Had no idea they remastered that.... anddd ordered
hasa diga eebowai

User Info: lazycomplife

3 years ago#77
lol this topic
Official Swinub - 3DS Friend Code: 0602-6783-9027
Steam/PSN/Nintendo ID: Sythierius

User Info: gamedude00000

3 years ago#78
"30fps is superior to 60fps"

No, it really isn't. 30 is certainly playable, but 60fps is better.
YouTuber and Writer for Hooked Gamers

User Info: KillerzOverHere

3 years ago#79
I prefer 1080p.

Apparently all GameFAQs mods are women, because they just gave me a warning for having a misogynistic joke in my signature.

User Info: wildog2006

3 years ago#80
phoxxent posted...
jokujokujoku posted...
wildog2006 posted...
This topic is now about how many hamsters would need to be stacked on top of each other in order to reach the moon.

It depends. It depends on what kind of hamster, and where in the orbit the moon is. I'll assume the moon is at its average distance (238,857 miles). And I'll guess at an approximate height of the average hamster at about 1.5 inches (some sources say 6 inches, but that's clearly length, not height). That being the case, it would take 10089319680 hamsters (approximately) stacked one on top of the other in order to reach the moon.

Now clearly such a stack would not be stable. A more stable formation would one hamster standing on the backs of four hamsters beneath it. So the top layer would have one hamster, the next would have 4, the next 9, etc. If we use this model, the number of hamsters required would be 3.42X10^29.

This number can vary drastically depending on the specific distance the moon is at, and the specific height of the hamsters. And obviously this doesn't take into account the troubles of weightlessness so far up, or just how you're going to get so many hamsters to stand still, or how the weight would positively crush the hamsters on the bottom. And at that point, it's probably better to just pile up a bunch of dead hamsters, but that's rather an unpleasant thought.

So, yeah. My estimate is 3.42X10^29 hamsters.

What about their position on the earth and elevation relative to sea level? are they just in the middle of a desert that is somehow exactly at sea level? Did they start on Ayers Rock? Come on, this is very important and must be brought into the equation!

Well, I live in Florida, so I'm gonna go with a Sea Level elevation.

Continue discussion.

Goraishi posted...
Wow... best post I've read in a long time.

I couldn't agree more.
London-SV on Throttle Control in Gran Turismo 6 ~ ''Unless you're flooring it at every opportunity... Try to be a little more genital on the accelerator''
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. 30fps is superior to 60fps

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived