This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

do you still look at system requirements?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. do you still look at system requirements?

User Info: __starsnostars

3 years ago#31
Not since the 90s.

User Info: arleas

3 years ago#32
I look but not because I'm worried I can't run it. I'm just curious what they list as the minimum and max...especially on older games. "Wow I could have run this on my toaster oven!"

User Info: WarGreymon77

3 years ago#33
Yes, I do. I do not like the newer versions of Windows, and have no intention of buying a new computer. My video card kicks ass, but my CPU and RAM are bound to be showing their age.

ATI Radeon HD 6950 (I think it's the 50, not sure)
Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 @ 2.4 Ghz
Windows Vista (Windows Classic visual style + classic Start menu + classic folders)

User Info: kobalobasileus

3 years ago#34
JKatarn posted...
kobalobasileus posted...
Allmattered posted...
Is there a need to? All System requirements in games these days are made up crap. Publishers just paste higher system reqs on their game each time to give the silly illusion that it looks better and improved *looks at COD.
Trust me, I've played plenty of modern games on my ancient PC to realize how much of BS system requirements are.

I'm pretty sure system requirements have ALWAYS been made up crap. It always drove me nuts when I'd buy a DOS game back in the day, read the system requirements of 4MB RAM, install it on my very expensive PC with 12MB RAM, and never get to play it because "not enough memory."

Why would they make them up? Why exclude potential consumers by lying about minimum requirements if they could list lower specs and expand their customer base? Also, that DOS situation was probably related to the allocation of conventional memory and had little to do with the "extended" 12MB of RAM in the machine. Probably needed to load DOS high.

The problem was whether a game wanted EMS or XMS. I was a tech illiterate kid at the time living with a "don't touch it you'll break it" father, so I was essentially screwed. The PC had one boot configuration. Períod.

Knowing tech as I do now, I can't help but wonder why those DOS devs didn't just bundle the executable with a batch script to set the right type of extra RAM on launch.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. do you still look at system requirements?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived