This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

why are most people against amd?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. why are most people against amd?

User Info: Setzera

Setzera
2 years ago#31
I've never meant to be an AMD guy, just keeps happening on it's own. With the exception of this last one I've built, that was intentional based on it's price/performance ratio.

I have nothing against Intel, just never seem to have a reason to choose it when I'm in the market for computers.
| AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 ghz | HD 7870 2GB | 8GB | Win7 64 | ~ ~ ~ | PS4 | PS3 | Wii U |

User Info: Boge

Boge
2 years ago#32
Nvidia is where the cool kids play.

AMD is still the better performance for the $. They're noisier and hotter, but faster.

I prefer Nvidia at this time because of the heat and noise issue. I have a mini ITX machine and I really enjoy it being as silent as possible.
http://penguinpetes.com/gallery/MyWalls/pigeon_chess.png

User Info: KURRUPTOR

KURRUPTOR
2 years ago#33
I've always been surprised Intel doesn't get all the hate directed at them. They release CPUs yearly with like 5% real time performance improvements, up the price over last years model (instead of decreasing the previous models price like the industry standard), cheap out on thermal parte so you can't oc properly without delidding your CPU and voiding the warranty, and have new socket types so you have to get a new mobo every time you upgrade.

That's like the definition of being anti consumer yet people are constantly praising them. They are worse than ea with the way they treat their paying customers yet instead of hate they get praise... I never understood it really.
Drugs are never the answer, unless the question is what isn't the answer.

User Info: DarkZV2Beta

DarkZV2Beta
2 years ago#34
Because they actually make a competitive product.
Blame AMD for Intel not improving performance. The lack of competition is why.
god invented extension cords. -elchris79
Starcraft 2 has no depth or challenge -GoreGross

User Info: GunmaN1905

GunmaN1905
2 years ago#35
Boge posted...
Nvidia is where the cool kids play.

AMD is still the better performance for the $. They're noisier and hotter, but faster.

I prefer Nvidia at this time because of the heat and noise issue. I have a mini ITX machine and I really enjoy it being as silent as possible.


My silent@30c idle vapor-x sapphire 280x says hi.
And I live in a very hot area.

I'd never buy nvidia over my 280x now for example, because for the same amount of money nvidia can't compare.

As for CPU, I've had intel since e8800 and now i7 920.
Haley Joel Osment 2 years ago#36
GunmaN1905 posted...
Boge posted...
Nvidia is where the cool kids play.

AMD is still the better performance for the $. They're noisier and hotter, but faster.

I prefer Nvidia at this time because of the heat and noise issue. I have a mini ITX machine and I really enjoy it being as silent as possible.

My silent@30c idle vapor-x sapphire 280x says hi.

Then you run Minecraft at 800x600 and nobody can hear it say anything any more over the vacuum cleaner noise. It's a generally accepted fact that AMD cards are hot, noisy and fail much more quickly than Nvidia ones.
I see dead people.

User Info: LaManoNeraII

LaManoNeraII
2 years ago#37
It's just the PC version of "console wars"

Turns out Nvidia fanboys are just as annoying as Sony fanboys, so take what they say with a grain of salt. Just look at the benchmarks and prices and decide for yourself, it's really that simple. Just chose the best card in your price range.
R.I.P LaManoNera
04-06-2009

User Info: reincarnator07

reincarnator07
2 years ago#38
LaManoNeraII posted...
It's just the PC version of "console wars"

Turns out Nvidia fanboys are just as annoying as Sony fanboys, so take what they say with a grain of salt. Just look at the benchmarks and prices and decide for yourself, it's really that simple. Just chose the best card in your price range.


Problem is (at least with CPUs) they flat out don't compete past the APUs for gaming anymore. At every other price point, Intel offers better performance for the price.
Fan of metal? Don't mind covers? Check out my youtube and give me some feedback
http://www.youtube.com/sircaballero

User Info: Nmilek1

Nmilek1
2 years ago#39
Bad experiences, every AMD I have owned has overheated amd died well before it's time.

see what i did there?

User Info: KURRUPTOR

KURRUPTOR
2 years ago#40
DarkZV2Beta posted...
Because they actually make a competitive product.
Blame AMD for Intel not improving performance. The lack of competition is why.


Blame AMD for Intel using very anti consumer business practices? I understand they don't need big improvements but why release something at all when the changes are so miniscule? It's because so many idiots keep upgrading anyways. If any thing is to blame it's the idiots who keep upgrading when they have barely increased performance at all since sandy bridge how many years ago.

Intel does a lot of shady crap, they've even been caught red handed paying off people to make their CPUs look better.

Like I said when ea re releases a new cod every year that has little to no improvements people around here laugh and say how crappy they are and don't understand why people would keep buying them. When Intel does the same thing people go nuts over the next big CPU and drop hundreds for a new CPU (plus motherboard since Intel can never use the same socket twice.

Yet somehow the hate falls on AMD for this according to fanboy logic.
Drugs are never the answer, unless the question is what isn't the answer.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. why are most people against amd?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived