This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

I have to admit Quantum is faster

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. I have to admit Quantum is faster

User Info: JoboHotep

JoboHotep
3 weeks ago#71
youshallbeasgod posted...
Djoser2000 posted...
Why are people always asking about NoScript?

After Quantum hit I tried uMatrix and it's far superior.

uMatrix works as adblocker too
One addon to rule them all


Yeah, I'm still reading through the wiki, but uMatrix seems to be doing what I want, so I'm really happy with it so far.

The additional info and options beyond what NoScript gave is really nice also, now that I'm reading what it all does.
i5 7600k / Hyper 212 / GIGABYTE GA-Z170M-D3H / 8GB 17000 DDR4 / Radeon R9 280x 3GB / SanDisk Z400s 240GB SSD / EVGA 600W ATX / Windows 10 Home 64 bit

User Info: Hexenherz

Hexenherz
3 weeks ago#72
Pauken posted...
Eh, Waterfox is better.

Mostly because of legacy addons, but also because thanks to utilizing multiple 64-bit cores it beats the snot out of FF's performance.

In addition to what Moonse said...
There's no guarantee that Waterfox is going to remain pre-Quantumified. The guy's on a couple week/month delay behind the latest Firefox releases... so yeah, it's got legacy support because you're using a legacy version of the browser right now >_>.
i dont like signatures
  1. Boards
  2. PC
  3. I have to admit Quantum is faster

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived