You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Metacritic is the WORST thing that has happened this gen - ok, maybe 2nd worst thing after DLC abuse
Not all gaming websites are created equal, they score differently (an 8.5 on IGN is like an 8 for gamespot), and most importantly, some are more professional and worthy than others.
People focus on IGN and Gamespot, but theres dozens of small crappy sites that I would never trust that influence the metacritic score
And the "user score" is usually either all 10s or all 0s by people who havent played the game.
what a stupid post. You have to be a big company to have a valid opinion now? really? so smaller websites that have played the game and aim to give an accurate review just don't measure up? The people reviewing at IGN or GS have some kind of special ability to review games? don't make me laugh. If anything, reviews from the big sites are less reliable since it they are influenced by advertising.
RE6 is an ok game. Not great, not terrible. That much is obvious.
We are not the masks we wear. But, if we don them, do we not become them? Sex, blood, R and R -http://youtu.be/aZZ0qOgKpHs
There are many reason why the user reviews gave the game a 0.1, they are sick and tired of Capcom's BS of saying "they are bringing survival horror back" which they have failed to do. They want the game to go back to the day RE was king, the late '90s to early 2000s, but no, Capcom gave the nostalgia fanboys the finger.