This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

What do you prefer: on-disc DLC or off-disc DLC

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 3
  3. What do you prefer: on-disc DLC or off-disc DLC

User Info: jammies

4 years ago#1
_________ - Results (172 votes)
19.19% (33 votes)
80.81% (139 votes)
This poll is now closed.

I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book.
Groucho Marx

User Info: jubjub360

4 years ago#2
I don't really care. On disc DLC is normally DLC I don't give a s*** about and off DLC is good later on.
F*** yo' MLA! It's all about that APA!

User Info: AnonUnknown

4 years ago#3
off-disc downloadable expansions, too bad they're pretty much unexisting nowadays.

User Info: themegaman7

4 years ago#4
Both suck equally as much. I want complete games.
PSN - Expa0
- The official Doppelganger of SMT IV boards -

User Info: Pereb27

4 years ago#5
Don't really care either, but if I had to choose it would be off-disc.

Take a game that has on-disc DLC.
If there was a scenario where they wouldn't be allowed to do on-disc DLC, they wouldn't have left said content unlocked on the disc, they would have removed it from the disc and release it as download later so they could charge for it anyway... unfortunately.

User Info: Fear the MONKEY

Fear the MONKEY
4 years ago#6
on disc....when there is no code that needs to be purschased to "unlock" it (especially day 1)

example: game of the year editions with all dlc on the disc

otherwise, theyre both rip offs
psn id: FearTheMonkey

User Info: sirtonne

4 years ago#7
I prefer free DLC, big expansions, or no DLC.

Never once paid for something like extra skins or short scenarios, and never will.

User Info: jubjub360

4 years ago#8
themegaman7 posted...
Both suck equally as much. I want complete games.

So DLC released a year after makes the original game incomplete?
F*** yo' MLA! It's all about that APA!
(message deleted)

User Info: Superfly Jo Jo

Superfly Jo Jo
4 years ago#10
I miss the days when companies actually released expansion packs for games like they did in the 90s and early 2000s for PC games. They were more often than not developed after the base games initial release, and contained a lot of content that really enhanced the experience. Some examples include Diablo II: Lord of Destruction, Doom 3: Resurrection of Evil, Starcraft: Brood War, GTA: London 1969, all the Quake and Quake 2 mission packs, etc. Now more often than not we get some map or weapon packs that cost $10 - $15 that are either locked on the disc or held back for a later date so they can get more money from our pockets. Some developers still put some thought and care into their expansions, but they're too few and far between.
PSN: spacedirtyjerz
Currently Playing: Resident Evil 3: Nemesis, Zelda: OoT, Sonic's Ultimate Genesis Collection, Conker's Bad Fur Day, Doom 3 BFG
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 3
  3. What do you prefer: on-disc DLC or off-disc DLC

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived