This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

How do you feel about people calling games "repetitive"?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 3
  3. How do you feel about people calling games "repetitive"?

User Info: FiendingHard

FiendingHard
4 years ago#1
Aren't all games repetitive to begin with? You can only jam in so many mini-games and mundane side quests before it becomes boring. Make the core gameplay fun first.
What is faith then but persistent hope in the face of relentless doubt.
Now Playing: Anarchy Reigns, Far Cry 3, Torchlight 2, Final Fantasy 9.

User Info: Excuse_Me

Excuse_Me
4 years ago#2
That they are just neckbeards with insanely high standards.

User Info: MlREFOX

MlREFOX
4 years ago#3
Competitive gaming should be repetitive. The change should be in how well you and your team play, not in the medium itself. The quickest way to kill competition is to infuse too much change or randomness.

User Info: superbowl54

superbowl54
4 years ago#4
some games are very repetitive, like a 2D beat-em-up. That's the definition of being repetitive.

Others, people just like being dense. Like FPS being repetitive "because all you do is shoot over and over"

It's a case by case basis
XBL: Beasts Inc; PSN: DeadlySilence
Currently Playing: Dark Souls, Persona 4 Arena, Black Ops 2, Hyperdimension Neptunia Mk2, ZOE HD, Valkyria Chronicles, DmC

User Info: MrSmadSmartAlex

MrSmadSmartAlex
4 years ago#5
I generally assume that they mean "tedious". Communication tends to work better when people aren't deliberately misunderstanding each other.

User Info: faris_ruhi

faris_ruhi
4 years ago#6
Depends on what context.

The gameplay of a game is repetitive, but it's about the situations the game throws at you that determines whether the game itself is repetitive. Unfortunately coming up with a formula of gameplay that is really, really fun, that you don't care about doing the same thing over and over again is very rare.

Assassins Creed 1 was definitely repetitive. You were visiting the three same (expanded environments) doing pretty much the same things to unlock assassination scenarios, and you did it like 9 times. At least 3 assassination scenarios felt similar with very little differences, if they had cut out 3, the game would've retained its freshness (a bit more) since all 6 assassinations would have significantly different feels for them, not to mention you would be doing those repetitive side missions less amount of times as well. Of course, varied side missions, assassinations would be preferred over cutting out 3 assassinations anytime. But I'm just talking about working with what the game had.
PSN: SYRAPH , GT: TheRealSyraph
Backlog on hold. Currently playing: Halo 4

User Info: 656stooge

656stooge
4 years ago#7
If you simplify things like that then you could make the most interesting and unique experiences sound repetitive TC.
No, not all games are repetitive. Not unless you grossly simplify them anyway. A game is a success if the player feels constantly challenged and the need to adapt, and a failure when they start to think "Oh not this again".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ_wbc3Z5C8

User Info: Eoin

Eoin
4 years ago#8
The core of any game is repetition and iteration. A game being repetitive isn't really a valid complaint. A game not being iterative is (and is often what people mean when they say a game is repetitive).
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation 3
  3. How do you feel about people calling games "repetitive"?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived