Bliz is buffing 2-handers!

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Diablo III
  3. Bliz is buffing 2-handers!

User Info: Arcom8065

Arcom8065
2 years ago#1
Rejoice! 25% damage buff! To balance this Heavenly Strength will apply a 20% damage penalty to crusaders. Still missing a socket but it's a good start.

<http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/13510080878>
I pretend to leave and then......SURPRISE ATTACK!!!!

User Info: Shale0

Shale0
2 years ago#2
This change is retroactive to existing live items.

Niiiiiiice. I'd still like to see an extra socket so you're not losing the opportunity for two emeralds, but this ain't bad.
It's a man's life in the British Dental Association!
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/national/fallen/

User Info: Thundercleese

Thundercleese
2 years ago#3
Shale0 posted...
This change is retroactive to existing live items.

Niiiiiiice. I'd still like to see an extra socket so you're not losing the opportunity for two emeralds, but this ain't bad.


Yeah, the 2-socket idea is not new and would be cool, but the challenge there would be with what happens to crusaders. They would need some crazy rebalancing (nerfing) to make it work or else they'd end up seriously OP.

I think it would probably work better if instead gems were twice as effective in 2-handed weapons when no off-hand is in use.
Don't think of it as deferred gratification. Think of it as immediate suffering. - Peter Bellamy

User Info: Athiniel

Athiniel
2 years ago#4
Thundercleese posted...
Shale0 posted...
This change is retroactive to existing live items.

Niiiiiiice. I'd still like to see an extra socket so you're not losing the opportunity for two emeralds, but this ain't bad.


Yeah, the 2-socket idea is not new and would be cool, but the challenge there would be with what happens to crusaders. They would need some crazy rebalancing (nerfing) to make it work or else they'd end up seriously OP.

I think it would probably work better if instead gems were twice as effective in 2-handed weapons when no off-hand is in use.


That would be an awful idea. Shield sockets don't get the weapon effects. A change like that would mean that Crusaders are the only class that can't benefit from the socket change.
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/athiniel-1803/hero/43504921

User Info: Arcom8065

Arcom8065
2 years ago#5
As the testing is done we'll see if the damage buff is comparable to an extra emerald. I'm just more fascinated to see if there will be 2 handers with powerful unique effects that will make the offhand /dual-wield sacrifice worth it for monks, barbs and staves.
I pretend to leave and then......SURPRISE ATTACK!!!!

User Info: Megaman Omega

Megaman Omega
2 years ago#6
I thought i would go to 1hand weapons for sure with my Barbarian. This changes everything.
LOL at all the whiners and trolls. They know Vita tv and new model will kill all competition. Festering wounds for the Nintendrones by the gallons. - karissa1

User Info: joshiki_r

joshiki_r
2 years ago#7
Thundercleese posted...
Yeah, the 2-socket idea is not new and would be cool, but the challenge there would be with what happens to crusaders. They would need some crazy rebalancing (nerfing) to make it work or else they'd end up seriously OP.


o u mean like the rediculously OP witch doctors hitting for 145 mil crits?

User Info: 2Cold_Scorpio

2Cold_Scorpio
2 years ago#8
Pretty cool but I don't really understand the need for the crusader nerf; its not like its a competitive game; what's it matter if a class is a bit stronger? /shrug Still, the 2H buff is a good thing.

User Info: Dead-Dragon

Dead-Dragon
2 years ago#9
Athiniel posted...
Thundercleese posted...
Shale0 posted...
This change is retroactive to existing live items.

Niiiiiiice. I'd still like to see an extra socket so you're not losing the opportunity for two emeralds, but this ain't bad.


Yeah, the 2-socket idea is not new and would be cool, but the challenge there would be with what happens to crusaders. They would need some crazy rebalancing (nerfing) to make it work or else they'd end up seriously OP.

I think it would probably work better if instead gems were twice as effective in 2-handed weapons when no off-hand is in use.


That would be an awful idea. Shield sockets don't get the weapon effects. A change like that would mean that Crusaders are the only class that can't benefit from the socket change.


Sure they could, if they didn't use a shield :)

User Info: tiamatttt

tiamatttt
2 years ago#10
2Cold_Scorpio posted...
Pretty cool but I don't really understand the need for the crusader nerf; its not like its a competitive game; what's it matter if a class is a bit stronger? /shrug Still, the 2H buff is a good thing.


It's not a competitive game, but it's still good to at least try to achieve some sort of balance between the classes so people just don't flock to one class while ignoring the others. (Obviously they have quite a way to go) I main sader, and while I would love the giant sized boost I would know that it's OP as hell and would only result in huge nerfs later. Like saders already does great damage now, give them a 25% boost while keeping all the benefits of the shield is just crazy, especially combined with great weapons like FOTF. Still even with the HS drawback I'm getting a free 5% boost of damage, so here's another reason to look forward to patch 2.1
  1. Boards
  2. Diablo III
  3. Bliz is buffing 2-handers!

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived