is this better then Field Commander?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Tom Clancy's EndWar
  3. is this better then Field Commander?

User Info: shyskillz

8 years ago#1
i really like that game...


8 years ago#2
Both of them are great :)! Why cant they both be great? Field Commander has a huge graphical advantage because EndWar is a port of the catoony DS version. Other than that, they're both fun.

User Info: 313detroit313

8 years ago#3
I would say that Field Commander is better, but End War is still fairly good (except for the NDS graphics).

User Info: AlexFili

8 years ago#4
Yggdra Union > both games

User Info: vaders13

8 years ago#5
All right. Time to settle a few items.

Is this better than Field Commander: yes and no.
NO:It does not look as nice. It does not playing as slick or speedy.
YES: It does offer more variety, more units and more strategy (and thankfully hexes not squares).

Is this game better than Advanced Wars: yes and no.
YES: No gay anime! Yeah! More realistic units. More detailed maps and scenery. Hexes not squares. No stupid commander "powers". It has more screen to use for the map since it is not limited by the DS micro screens.
NO: Does not have nearly as many maps (yet), does not have as well told a story, does not have nearly as good of a sandbox mode with options for setting up custom maps.

In general, it is a more strategic, realistic look and feel, more real modern units. It is trying to be a sim much more than Advanced Wars or Field Commander. That is not really better or worse, it just depends on which you prefer...

As for the satelite load screen: Yes, you can always push the x button and skip it. It wastes about 1/2 second of your time. After several missions your console is upgraded and you no longer even have the option to see the satelite transition, it is simply removed from the game. So if you don't like it, it does not last long.

As for map sizes, they are deceiving compared to the 2 previously mentioned games. The hexes are smaller in Endwar than the squares in the other 2 games, so more of them fit on the screen. So, though they appear to be smaller maps that don' t require much scrolling, actually they are still larger maps with smaller spaces.

User Info: lostcali8

8 years ago#6

No way man. My brother picked this up and I've been playing it the last few days. I also have Field Commander and I've gotta say, Field Commander is better in every way. Not just the obvious things like graphics and sound but the gameplay seems more fluid and enjoyable.

People seem to say Endwar is more strategic but I don't know, theres something about the gameplay that just seems so slow paced and lame.

Maybe it's just me but theres certainly more features and game time to be had in FC. For sure has my vote..

User Info: willy279

8 years ago#7
shyskillz posted...
i really like that game...

Me too :D
  1. Boards
  2. Tom Clancy's EndWar
  3. is this better then Field Commander?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived