ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

User Info: Toe_Jamulonis

Toe_Jamulonis
5 years ago#1
80/80

Starting with the least

1. Sejuani
2. Viktor
3. Xerath
4. Urgot
5. Orianna
6. Gragas
7. Leona
8. Heimerdinger
9. Yorick
10. Karma

This is based off of http://www.lolstatistics.com/champions/all - sorting by popularity. Other notables low on the list, Galio, Rumble, Maoki, Trundle


There are quite a few very strong champs in this list, Urgot, strong anti carry, Vik/Xer/Gragas very strong APs, is pretty underrated as a support and Yorick never loses a lane.

Most popular - no surprises - Ash, GP, Soraka, Cait, Warwick

User Info: MlREFOX

MlREFOX
5 years ago#2
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?

User Info: NormalCat

NormalCat
5 years ago#3
MlREFOX posted...
Doesn't that site only show daily stats?

DING DING DING!

[/topic]
http://steamcommunity.com/id/randomdog

User Info: Toe_Jamulonis

Toe_Jamulonis
5 years ago#4
Shows stats for the previous 14 days

User Info: StonedApe7200

StonedApe7200
5 years ago#5
Sejuani es #1 ganker. Once someone picks her in a tournament she will become FOTM.
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/StonedApe720/Kobe-1.jpg

User Info: XcZeus3469

XcZeus3469
5 years ago#6
yea you cant really go by last 14 days we need at least a few months to aggregate the data set....and I see less karmas than anything
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA

User Info: flame_master14

flame_master14
5 years ago#7
Strange, I almost never see other GPs... Although, even when I do, someone (else) invariably leaves the matchmaking queue, so I don't get to see how they play him...
I've decided to work on a VN, want in?

User Info: Toe_Jamulonis

Toe_Jamulonis
5 years ago#8
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc

User Info: XcZeus3469

XcZeus3469
5 years ago#9
Jomosapian posted...
Yeah a sample larger than 14 days would be nice, but with patches and champions being released every few weeks, the champ usage statistics from a month or two ago wouldn't be relevent.

Data from a month or two again wouldn't consider reworked Shen, Warick buffs, ziggs, Olaf buffs, etc etc


That's a fair point. Which makes it rather hard to make any statistical conclusions over the long run...I guess the best we acn do is "during the X patch, these champs were most/least used"
"I've been playing badly, but it's still enough to beat [Cruncher]"
-EGIdrA

User Info: Master of Hate

Master of Hate
5 years ago#10
The unfortunate thing about it is that Riot should take not of these sorts of statistics.

There's a reason you don't see half the champs on that list very often; they're very situational, UP, or in need of a buff. Yet they ignore and continue to neglect the people who need love the most (Heimerdinger, anyone?)
askpeevies: Guys guess what. WoW and FFXI aren't the only MMO's.
AuRamza: Go back to Korea
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. ITT:The ten least-played Champions in sequential order from least to most played

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived