Ranked: Many Champions or Few?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. Ranked: Many Champions or Few?

User Info: POkemon_PoWeR

4 years ago#1
Which is better? - Results (36 votes)
Be good at lot of champions
30.56% (11 votes)
Be perfect/flawless with a small amount of champions
69.44% (25 votes)
This poll is now closed.
Assuming that you have champions that fit every role and can play every role decently, which is better to have?
I'm watching videos and a lot of people are saying that it's better to be perfect with one or two champions because you'll get more elo playing them.
I'm contemplating doing this but still doubting it's validity.
I'm the best player here. The rest of you aren't as good as me-ninja1357
LoL IGN: m0bilize (NA)

User Info: FlameLord23

4 years ago#2
Depends on the number of a "small amount". I would say a small amount i max 10, large is about 50. Being good at quite a few champions can allow you to be more versatile in team picks. I hate being good at about 5 champions, i'd rather be able to play more.
Violence is never the answer.
Because the answer is always Vlad.

User Info: T_M0ney

4 years ago#3
my problem in ranked for a long time was i kept playing champs i wasnt great with. I still have a stable of a few champions for each role, but if i can play my preferred champion i will. Nothing wrong with playing a lot of champions, but its not always the way to go. Sometimes you can get a great counter pick though.
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. Ranked: Many Champions or Few?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived