Should all lanes get a sightstone and sell it later?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. Should all lanes get a sightstone and sell it later?

User Info: Ultraknight64

Ultraknight64
4 years ago#1
Except for adc should everyone get a sightstone and sell it back? It would benefit the whole team but might set you behind.
Not happy with committing just murder, he had to go and dirty the courthouse, too!? GUILTY - Judge

User Info: FvP

FvP
4 years ago#2
I would rather spend the money on pinks
FvP | falco_vs_peach | *^*"The Shinies" Member*^* | Adventure Time Member
PBWSB | PDPSB | /pdpsb/ | PBWSB User Tournament Winner: DiabIo

User Info: FlameLord23

FlameLord23
4 years ago#3
If they're going to sell them back then just buy wards.
"All of a sudden there are useless topics on gamefaqs. Oh wait, that's all the time." ~Try_Harder_Nubz
LoL IGN: I Rock Ths

User Info: Alakazam_fan

Alakazam_fan
4 years ago#4
Sightstone does not prevent stupid.
Don't stop, never give up, hold your head high and reach the top. Let the world see what you have got. Bring it all back to you.
~Elise is mai waifu~

User Info: kiba312

kiba312
4 years ago#5
FlameLord23 posted...
If they're going to sell them back then just buy wards.
(-_-(-_-(0.o)-_-)-_-)
oh noes 0.o

User Info: profDEADPOOL

profDEADPOOL
4 years ago#6
kiba312 posted...
FlameLord23 posted...
If they're going to sell them back then just buy wards.


Uh has the PBe change of it being more expensive and building from a Ruby Crystal gone through already?

because with it just being 700 gold it will save you money rather quickly if you wouldn't be using pinks so you should get it instead of wards.
Official Mienshao of the pokemon B/W and BW2 clan
Comic pull list: UXF, WatX, Hawkguy, Secret Avengers, Gambit, Cable & X-force, and JLD

User Info: TomorrowDog

TomorrowDog
4 years ago#7
Yeah, right now Sightstone is cost-efficient if you just use the four wards once and sell it when you go back the first time. If you can pick up a second one on top/mid/jungler it is very effective.
"Happiness is nature's way of telling human resources you're overpaid." - Catbert

User Info: SorrySleeping

SorrySleeping
4 years ago#8
From: FlameLord23 | #003
If they're going to sell them back then just buy wards.


For the moment, buying sightstone, using the four wards, then selling it saves you 90g versus just buying four wards. Considering for mid/top, it can cover the lane for 12 minutes, there is no reason to not get one if you need wards.
~{Always Sleeping}~

User Info: Beech_tibs

Beech_tibs
4 years ago#9
SorrySleeping posted...
From: FlameLord23 | #003
If they're going to sell them back then just buy wards.


For the moment, buying sightstone, using the four wards, then selling it saves you 90g versus just buying four wards. Considering for mid/top, it can cover the lane for 12 minutes, there is no reason to not get one if you need wards.


You are forgetting the opportunity costs and factors of inflation when you say this
a lot of people are sheep so they won't believe a champion is strong until a pro says so

User Info: Sword_Slasher

Sword_Slasher
4 years ago#10
Beech_tibs posted...

You are forgetting the opportunity costs and factors of inflation when you say this


Opportunity costs, okay. Factors of inflation? What do you mean
Posted from my N-Gage
  1. Boards
  2. League of Legends
  3. Should all lanes get a sightstone and sell it later?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived