You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
You are so wrong. RS2 is a good game with a couple of flaws. Great use of motion plus. damn stuff saying lies.. --- TvC:Mgt2. 0947-3607-8037, BT3,CJ,Tmnt,Brawl:Retired MH3:ID HW43GW Name: Mgt2
It was rushed and it was borring. It's like they put a bunch of gaming elements in to a bag, shook it up, and turned it in to a game. No online, no local multiplayer, graphics that don't appeal to the masses, No 1:1 sword fighting, and way over the top in a bad way.
I said you are lying and to the other dude too. Any way RS2 flaws are, Replay value which the game has but not what people wanted. The story is meh. Load time in doors annoyed some people. Now lol @ game rushed comment and bland and Graphic and Motion 1.1. lololol you guys are just lolol
Yeah from the videos I saw of Red Steel 2, it put me off big time. No multiplayer is criminal for a start as it's a game perfectly suited to it, no matter what Ubisoftinthehead think, it was a big mistake. Plus they made it out to be some big sprawling game set in the west with these big neon cities and such but it just looks very cardboard cutout to me and the levels look really limited in scope and scale. And isn't there only like 3 guns? Awesome.
I'd also like to add that I think companies like Ubisoft give the Wii a bad name. Have they released one decent game for the Wii??? I can't think of any, even RS1 was badly flawed. Too much Rabbids one one console for me.