What makes rapid-fire weapons "good" against shields?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Mass Effect 3
  3. What makes rapid-fire weapons "good" against shields?


4 years ago#1
I've hard multiple times from numerous people that rapid fire weapons are "good" against shields. Does anyone know the exact reason WHY. Do SMGs have some hidden damage modifier in ME3 (I know they did in the other games but I see no indication in this one) or does it cost energy shields a certain amount of energy to activate from any bullet hit whatsoever (thus causing rapid fire weapons to activate this cost alot?)?

Somebody please clear things up for me... or confirm for me that weapon type doesn't matter at all regardless of what you're damaging (with some obvious exceptions like the Acolyte).

User Info: XgArrancar

4 years ago#2
Nope, SMGs used to have a damage modifier in ME2 but now they have been relegated to crap sidearms bar 2 of them.
"Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?"

User Info: Malzel

4 years ago#3
If anything, it's not that they're good against shields, it's that they're bad against armor.
It is only human to commit a sin...

User Info: GoldenSWarriors

4 years ago#4
collector SMG gets a 1.5x bonus to armor
GT: F3rocious Panda

User Info: abyss

4 years ago#5
Carry over from ME2, I imagine. Damage modifiers against defenses is now a per weapon thing, not based on weapon class.


4 years ago#6
Armor I understand because it chops a set amount of damage off each bullet. (50 on gold). So if you have a gun that shoots 5 times at 100 damage each bullet you do 250 in the end versus a gun that does 1 shot at 500 damage and does 450 overall.

I was wondering if shields worked the opposite, that each bullet to hit did a set amount of damage on top of it's regular, giving rapid-fire weapons the advantage. But if they don't then I really don't see the point to using rapid fire weapons at all except when they're completely ridiculously outdamaging of everything else like the Harrier is. Then again I guess the Harrier, Hurricane, and Piranha are the only rapid-fire weapons I see above Silver anyway. The rest all seem pretty crappy, especially compared to the likes of the Javelin or Black Widow... or even just a class that can set off alot of Biosplosions or Tech Bursts.

User Info: perfect_general

4 years ago#7
Shield gate is less of an issue with rapid fire weapons.
"He who laughs last, doesn't get the joke"

User Info: MegaTape13

4 years ago#8
I assume it's more of an abstract point, as shield gating is a non-issue for rapid fire weapons and they can easily prime frequent tech bursts.

Or it's just total nonsense...
Oh the movie never ends...

User Info: AllDay524

4 years ago#9
From: perfect_general | #007
Shield gate is less of an issue with rapid fire weapons.

This, well especially before the patch that let us bypass shield gate with enough damage.
'I was looking up Pokemon Hentai today and it was full of Gardevoirs and Pikachus. I'm like what the hell is this? Wheres all the May and Dawn pics?' LittleUnit

User Info: bloodgod92

4 years ago#10
I was under the impression that they were good against shields/barriers because the rate of fire keeps the shield from regeneration in between shots. Though I would think the only time your weapon would not be sufficient is if you were using a single shot slow reload gun...
Gamer Tag - Aldora92
Currently Playing - Mass Effect 3 MP
  1. Boards
  2. Mass Effect 3
  3. What makes rapid-fire weapons "good" against shields?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived