hide results

    Robot Building FAQ by Korium9

    Version: 2.0 | Updated: 04/06/05 | Search Guide | Bookmark Guide

    Robot Arena: Design and Destroy (a.k.a. Robot Arena 2)
    |WW. """ j A8W | """ ) gWW  AV  AWW AL=~* ;A W7 """ | """ j '""jW  AW| | """ AH
    |WW  AV  ! AW# | AWV ) """ .AW  AWA.W| .+*"W,W  AWW | AWW 7 ====W |AW  j WW  AH
    Given the size of the guide. A code of sorts was made so that you can pop them
    into a finder and jump to any particular section. 
    RA201 INTRO
    RA205C POWER
    RA212 OTHER Q'S
    RA201 =========================================================================
    Robot Arena: Design and Destroy (here in shortened to RA2) is an 
    action/arcade/simulation game based on the robotic combat events seen on TV. As 
    of when this was written (late 2003), it is the best of the remote controlled 
    robot fighting games out there. Customization and versatility are what set it 
    apart from all those before it.
    RA2 is a tough game to write an FAQ for. This isn't a FPS or platform jumper 
    where I can say "at this point jump on x to kill y" or the like. This game, 
    (just go with me on this one) is actually closer to and RPG 3D Fighting Game. 
    "What?[!] Are you @$#%ing nuts?[!]" you say. "This game is nothing like an RPG, 
    it doesn't have swords and spells and what not!" Ah, but it does have swords 
    (and axes, for that matter). And spells? Well, depends on what you count a 
    Havok glitch I suppose... Anyway, just look at it: you start from nothing 
    and build a mechanical warrior. This warrior will end up having some kind of 
    weapon type  - very similar to the class system in most RPGs. Implicitly, you 
    have stats in ways of offense, defense, and control. RPGs have things like 
    attack, armor, and agility (or something like that). Having said that, [minus 
    downloaded bots] each and every robot warrior will be unique in some way. 
    RA202 =========================================================================
    082303 First rendition, several sections incomplete.
    050204 Second rendition, Big re-structure and additions.
    040605 Third rendition, deleted comments on the AU power pack; various things
    RA203 =========================================================================
    Windows 98/ME/2000/XP
    450 MHz Pentium II or higher
    64 MB RAM
    170 MB Hard Disk Space
    4x Speed CD-ROM
    16 MB 3D Windows 98/ME/2000/XP compatible graphics card
    Windows 98/ME/2000/XP compatible sound card
    TCP/IP (LAN or Internet for online play) (DSL, Cable modem or faster)
    DirectX 8.1 (included) or higher
    Mouse & Keyboard 
    RA204 =========================================================================
    Navigation and building is mouse-based.
    Any time:
    [F11]: take a screen shot
    When building:
    [shift]: change component position (rotation) by left/right mouse movement
    [control]: change component height by left/right mouse movement
    [delete]: remove selected component
    [right click]: toggles orbiting around robot or component w/ mouse
    [mouse wheel]: zoom in/out
    The game allows full customization in terms of what controls your robot.
    (The default controls for the ready-made  bots use the WASD control system, 
    with [space-bar] as the weapon)
    Match keys:
    [Esc]: Pauses game and brings up the match menu
    [F1]: Pauses game and shows the current wire controls
    [F2]: Orbit camera. defaults to just behind the robot; use left mouse button 
         (right button in test area) to change the camera's angle and mouse wheel 
         to zoom in and out.
    [F3]: Stationary camera. ("Blimp cam")
    [F4]: Watch camera (camera automatically tracks and follows bot)
    RA205 =========================================================================
    Robot Arena has you make an outline of your chassis, then extrude it. After 
    that, you place all your components inside this, like a fish tank. This is 
    somewhat the reverse of real life, where most people start with the components, 
    and build out. Of course, that would just not be logistically possible. The 
    downside is that you usually have to know what kind of robot you're building 
    from the start. 
    Here are some typical Chassis shapes and how they've usually been used:
    Rectangles: everything
    Triangles: Wedges, Spinners, Spears
         Triangular wedges become a bit of a plow shape. This becomes useful in 
    tabletop matches. Some spinners opt to place their weapon head as close to the 
    apex of the triangle and the drive wheels at the other corners. This often 
    ensures that the weapon covers the entire front half of the robot. Do note that 
    angled chassis shapes can make placing components difficult.
    T-shapes: Rams, Hammers, Spears, Thwacks
         If the front is the top of the "T," it makes a good shape to setup a 
    ramming surface. The drive motors are wheels are then mounted behind that, 
    fairly protected. Thwacks, of course, may set up in the opposite orientation, 
    such that the lower part of a "T" is the weapon boom. 
    H-shapes: Clamps, Hammers, Saws, Spears
        In this case, it's not really necessary to make the middle bar in the exact 
    center. You'll probably want to move it upwards for more lead-in space. An H 
    shape would be used versus a U/V if you wanted a longer stance for the wheels.
    I-shapes: Spinners, Rams
         Here, there's a factor of which orientation is the front. For rams, it's 
    better to have the top of the "I" as the front making a chassis design similar 
    to a "T" design, just capped on both ends. Spinners, on the other hand, are 
    going to want to have the sides be the front, adopting a wide stance. This will 
    give them much better control of their weapon. In addition, it makes for a huge 
    area of attack. A real robot known as "Sweet" is a perfect example.
    U/V-shapes: Clamps, Saws, Hammers, Vertical Spinners
         As you'll read below, the listed weapon types benefit from immobilizing 
    the enemy. 
    Hexagons/Octagons: Wedges, Spinners, Thwacks
         These are similar to a circular chassis [below], but are easier to get 
    even-sloped edges. 
    Circles: Spinners (and on occasion a hammer)
         It comes to no surprise that a spinner would adopt a circular chassis, If 
    you want a more conical shape, you're going to have to un-click the "snap to 
    grid" box and move them manually. Really though, it's probably just better to 
    use a hexagon or octagon instead. There isn't much other reason to use a 
    circular chassis with any of the other weapon types. 
    Now, repeat after me: 
    Say it again. 
    Seriously, there is no design that will do _everything_. It just is not 
    possible. Of course, that doesn't mean that there aren't good designs or bad 
    designs; far from it, but nothing will ever be able to handle all scenarios. 
    When you construct a robot you have a machine that performs in basically three 
    different categories: Offense (weapon), Mobility (drive), and Defense (armor) 
    (OMD). A subset of mobility is self-righting or being invertible. Also, power 
    factors into Offense and Mobility. If you look at these stats, you can only 
    distribute so many attributes to each. Of course, in this game it isn't clear 
    cut and in numbers where you assign values to each stat. In this case, it's 
    more along degrees of emphasis. After a while, you run out of space or hit the 
    weight limit. And yes, there is some overlap between them.
    All right, let's cover the fun stuff at the front: 
    RA205A ************************************************************************
    In Battlebots, matches are often scored by judges in terms of damage, 
    aggression, and strategy. RA2, however, tallies up damage and assumes the other 
    categories. Damage values vary depending on the weapon used and the velocity in 
    which it is traveling. F=MA. (Force = Mass*Acceleration) Remember that. Also 
    keep in mind that chassis damage (crunching] is merely cosmetic. It will not 
    effect the collision shape of the chassis.
    While there aren't any official rules regarding weapon building per se, there 
    are some things to keep in mind if you are to use any machines for online play:
    + In general, employing more than 3 or 4 active weapons is excessive.
    + A vast number of pneumatic pistons will lag
    + Connecting pneumatic pistons to each other is _not_ recommended
    + Don't attach spikes to axle mounts
    + Massive # of spikes or other parts (more than 6-8 is overkill) lag the game
    + Stack motors (attaching the motor axle to another motor) with discretion. 
         + 2 Stacked spin motors are dangerous, and more than that is overdoing it.
         + Don't stack burst motors (or burst motors to pistons)
    + Do not make a robot that purposely causes problems with the physics engine.
    + Check with whoever you're playing against regarding custom parts (for one 
    thing, they have to have them, too). In addition, you have to alter some game 
    data. Tournaments generally do not allow them.
    RA205AA +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    These are the basic weapon designs that are common in the world of robotic 
    combat. Under the type, I've listed real-world examples.
    RA205AAA ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Tricerabot, Hammerhead, Ogre
    For all intents and purposes, your drive train and your weapon motors are one 
    and the same. You are going to need at least 4 wheel drive for better control 
    and maximum speed. Ideally you must be invertible and using the most powerful 
    motors available. Traction is key, so have the wheels with the widest treads. 
    Place your wheels as far forward and rearward as conveniently possible. This 
    helps prevent you from losing traction if you get lifted. An alternate strategy 
    for rams is to employ automotive steering (the powered steering unit). It's a 
    bit easier to make minute turning adjustments while ramming. Since the unit is 
    invertible, be sure to have alternate control keys when upside down. This is 
    much easier than using the standard controls. The front of your machine must be 
    strong enough to withstand the high-speed rams and the beating that results 
    while doing so. Having multiple spikes can rack up points quickly and make 
    aiming less tedious. However, know that in an online battle, the risk of 
    lagging the battle becomes greater. Be sure to have rails or spikes on your 
    side plates so you won't get stuck in an embarrassing position. 
    The ram's greatest weakness is requiring a long charge to cause enough damage. 
    In addition, with the 4+ wheels, rams are inherently large. This provides a big 
    target for hammers (and some spears). Vertical spinners may be tough since 
    ramming one head-on may result in them flipping you over. Often, rams will have 
    their wheels mounted outside the chassis in order to have maximum internal 
    space for batteries and motors. Your opponent is going to go after these as 
    quickly as possible. Put guards of some kind if you can.
    STRONG: Spinners, saws, 
    WEAK: Lifters, Wedges, Hammers, Vertical Spinners
    Pro: Nearly unstoppable drive train
    Con: Very difficult to control
    RA205AAB ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Double Agent, Bad Attitude, Mosquito, War Machine
    The most popular design feature on any machine. The idea is to get the wedge 
    under the opponent and take away their traction, even flip them over. Some 
    wedges are two wheeled and let the chassis hinge on these wheels, resulting in 
    a ground scraping front wedge. Others use a parallelogram style wedge which is 
    advantageous if you get flipped over. Getting the chassis as flat against the 
    ground as possible is the easiest way to get under the opponent. This is done 
    with a combination of motor height and wheel choice. Few designs incorporate 
    just the wedge alone, and in a game defined by points, just the wedge will not 
    likely be enough to win. However, it always makes for a good, solid back-up 
    weapon (everyone saw Minion during Season 1, right?). When you get under an 
    opponent, you are robbing them of their control. The opponent is at your mercy. 
    Thus, all wedges need a strong drive train. Since the sloping chassis means 
    less component space, wedges will usually be slower than a ram of the same 
    original chassis outline. 
    A wedge gets a disadvantage in that it can't easily reinforce the attacking 
    surface the same way rams can. Depending on the wedge, see if you can mount 
    spikes to prevent the opponent from driving over you. This will add damage, but 
    may cause problems with invertibility. The ground-scraping aspect of a wedge 
    means that it is easy to lose traction and driving ability if something manages 
    to lift part of the chassis. It also means they can high-center very easily.
    STRONG: Just about everything that can't get under it
    WEAK: Hammers, anything lower (lifters, another wedge)
    Pro: Simple, yet effective 
    Con: Little-to-no damage on their own, highly susceptible to attack
    RA205AAC ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Vlad the Impaler, Firestorm, Biohazard; Toro, T-minus, Hexadecimator
    Lifters take the concept behind the wedge and actuate it. The default burst 
    motors in RA are not very strong and can pretty much only do moderate lifting 
    (especially in the heavier weight classes). Remember, bursts have to lift not 
    only the [up-to-800kg] opponent, but the attachments, as well. Servos are 
    generally not usable, although there has been some minor accounts of success 
    (may need counter-weights). One way to get around this is to have multiple 
    arms. Light, wide, and low should be your lifter. Of course, obtaining all 
    three is very difficult. When you try lifting someone, you'll notice that the 
    amount of force necessary often causes the rear of your bot to rise. In order 
    to counter-act this, mount outriggers out and under the lifter. The general 
    strategy for a lifter is to get under the opponent and forcefully 
    take away their traction, flipping them over or taking them to a hazard. Thus a 
    similar drive train sufficient for a wedge is recommended. Making a lifter out 
    of spikes is a good idea, to get some damage points from a lift (it will be 
    pathetically low, however). Having a pneumatic lifter is possible, but the 
    pistons have to be aimed straight up. Lifter arms usually fall under two 
    categories: Upward (standard) and Forward.
    Upward arms are the most common type, seen just about everywhere. When 
    positioning the arms, angle them slightly lower than level with the ground. 
    This causes some downward force against the playing surface, making it easier 
    to get under a wedge. It's pretty easy to self-right with the lifting arm 
    (unless you're Sentinel, apparently).
    Forward-style arms are somewhat uncommon, reportedly first pioneered in Robot 
    Wars UK by a robot called Cassius. The weapon concept lives on in Firestorm. 
    The design requires a wedge-body. Once the opponent rides up the wedge, the 
    weapon is fired, which swings forward, away from the chassis. If you make the 
    arm out of spikes, you also gain the ability to hammer the opponent. A 
    disadvantage of this weapon type is the abuse the wedge will get. 
    It is possible to make an arm similar to Biohazard by connecting two burst 
    motors. Just be aware that it isn't as effective as a true 4-bar lifter arm and 
    is rather unstable.
    Pop-Ups have sprung up as a design solution to the low damage problem of 
    lifters. The idea is to have combine both the Forward and Upward designs, such 
    that the arms scissor against the opponent. Pop-ups usually have no less than 3 
    burst motors inside. The arms are light, usually made of a couple spikes.
    By attaching a pneumatic piston to the burst motor, you will get a little bit 
    more power, plus a more complex lift. This creates something more akin to a 
    launcher. Since launchers are dedicated to out right flipping the opponent, 
    supposedly a drive train is not as crucial. However, investing in driving power 
    is a good idea, especially against machines that are invertible. Typically, 
    launchers do well in matches with multiple opponents. You can flip one robot, 
    turn around and flip the next closest robot. Usually, the first opponent needs 
    time to re-orient him/herself if invertible, or needs time to self-right.
    In both cases, your worst enemies are spinners and thwacks. A spinner is going 
    to be very difficult to get under without risking the loss of your lifter arm. 
    Thwacks by design are almost impossible to get in a position where a wheel 
    doesn't touch the ground. 
    STRONG: Anything non-invertible it can get under
    WEAK: Thwacks, Spinners
    Pro: Can render an opponent helpless.
    Con: Generally low damage, 
    RA205AAD ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Huggy Bear, Complete Control, Dead Metal
    In this game, clamps are less successful for the same reason that lifter's and 
    wedges aren't rewarded, but also in that most of the mechanics just aren't 
    strong enough. There have been some innovative ways of achieving this. So far, 
    downward jaws seem to be the most successful. The trick is to use burst motors 
    that start in the "closed" position. Then time the opening of the jaws such 
    that the return swing closes down on the opponent. Clamps rarely work well on 
    their own. By combining it with another weapon, like a saw, you can keep your 
    opponent from moving while your other weapons do damage. Otherwise, this robot 
    type does best in arenas with hazards. Your drive train will have to be on par 
    with a lifter, since your going to be moving a huge mass.
    Spinners and hammers are your toughest fights. Both are going to rip off the 
    arms of your robot with the first chance they've got. The worst part is that 
    getting (and maintaining) a good grip is extremely difficult.
    STRONG: Anything small enough to fit in the grab zone
    WEAK: Spinners, Hammers, 
    Pro: (If done well), will give you complete control of the opponent.
    Con: Difficult to build effectively.
    RA205AAE ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Blade Runner, Herr Gepounden, T-Wrex, Whirligig
    Thwacks are almost always two wheeled and invertible. Essentially, they employ 
    sit-and-spin tactics using just their drive train. Long extenders with a heavy 
    attachment form the weapon. This can be very destructive. Unfortunately, the 
    thwack is hindered by not being able to move while spinning. For the AI 
    opponents, this is fine; the computer will always move in regardless of what 
    you're doing. Human opponents, however, are much more savvy and will wait for 
    you to stop spinning. Like the wedge, a thwack exists as one of the easiest 
    designs to make. It is very difficult to disable by lifters and launchers, and 
    the shape often makes for a hard target for hammers. Of course, also like the 
    wedge, the thwack works better as an alternative or back-up weapon since it 
    relies entirely on your drive train (and if your drive train's dead, so are 
    you). No, currently, there is no way to employ a Melty-brain or Tornado drive 
    system in this game (used by Blade Runner and Herr Gepounden to translate while 
    spinning). Interestingly, a greater width between the two opposing wheels makes 
    for a faster spin (in real life, the opposite usually happens).
    An off shot of the thwack is the overhead thwacks like Overkill and Toe 
    Crusher. The concept is to have the entire chassis built within the radius of 
    the wheels minus a single extender. While moving forward, if you suddenly 
    reverse, the entire chassis spins forward, swinging the weapon. Within the 
    game's physics, this is just not possible. The only way to accomplish this is 
    through thwack walkers (using discs or saws as wheels). 
    In any case, a thwack has several disadvantages. As said, you can't move while 
    spinning and your opponent can come at you from any direction. Wedges are hard 
    to fight since your weapon will easily get deflected. It is possible to try 
    angle your weapon to act as a wedge, although it is difficult to have it at 
    precisely the right angle to get under the opponent. Lastly, and it's more 
    dependent on who you're fighting, but thwacks are generally not appreciated 
    amongst the community.
    STRONG: Lifters, boxy robots
    WEAK: Rams, Spears, wedges
    Pro: Simple to build, good damage
    Con: Difficult to drive, limited mobility
    RA205AAF ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Frenzy, Deadblow, Pressure Drop, No Apologies, Diesector, Beta Hurtz
    In this game, hammers are solely electric powered. Like thwacks, hammers 
    utilize kinetic energy and bring their weapon down onto the opposing robot. The 
    easiest way to achieve this is to use burst motors. Unfortunately, none of the 
    burst motors allow for a full 180 degree swing (somewhere around 120-150 
    degrees). In addition, the default burst motors lack sufficient power to fully 
    self-right on a return swing. You can often be able to right yourself if the 
    hammer is fully retracted (the AI does this).
    An alternative to burst motors is to use spin motors like Diesector or Frenzy. 
    Unfortunately, this usually results in less damage. For a faster swing, it is 
    best to employ a counterweight (like a sledge hammer head) on the opposite end 
    of the hammer arm. Unfortunately, the ability to self-right is not guaranteed 
    (depends on how well-balanced it is). Often times, the hammer arm has to be 
    constantly swinging, almost like a spinner when it is flipped. This design 
    often ends up being rather tall in order to allow the counter weight to swing 
    underneath. Of course, if you mount them like Diesector and be fully 
    invertible, than it shouldn't be a problem. One thing you will encounter is to 
    be careful on the return swing. The hammer head is going to strike the floor, 
    damaging the head. If you're not careful, the weapon might break and then 
    you're sunk. 
    Control is the key for your robot. Watching the TV show(s), you've probably 
    noticed one of the problems of hammers is that they often miss. Do not mount 
    your hammer on a turret. Your aim will go out the window. Your drive train 
    should be enough that you can turn and aim your robot in a controllable manner. 
    It is a good idea to make the front of your robot into a "v" or otherwise have 
    a forward indentation to lead your opponent into the kill zone. Of course, this 
    means it can lead your opponent's weapons into this region as well, so 
    reinforce appropriately. More than any other weapon type, driving skill is 
    important. Rams and spinners (all of them) can count on their weapons to take 
    the brunt of a forward charge. Even spears can rely on their weapon's speed and 
    rush in (not that I recommend this tactic, mind you). Hammers can't do that. 
    Blitzing an opponent will just get the front end of your machine crunched and 
    possibly even your weapon arm ripped off.
    On the plus side, hammers are one of the best counter-attacks to a wedge bot. A 
    wedge surface presents itself as a huge target. Since a wedge is sloped, and 
    low to the ground, you often get the full stroke (swing) of your weapon, 
    causing maximum damage. It is very difficult and it depends on their weapon 
    mounts, but hammers can often get good shots at a vertical spinners weapon 
    motor(s). Just make sure your reach is longer than his weapon radius. It is 
    also the ideal weapon for hitting enclosed wheels.
    When facing another hammer robot, it comes down to control and who has better 
    positioning (and timing). Spears can be a nightmare for hammers. They too are 
    going to be utilizing control and positioning. However, they have speed on 
    their side. A spear can usually get in at least twice as many hits and each 
    strike is going to bounce your bot around, messing up your aim. Spinners can be 
    tough, just make sure you start striking after you've stopped their weapon.
    STRONG: Robots with a large, exposed  roof (usually rams and wedges) and/or 
         lots of extenders
    WEAK: Spinners, Spears, other Hammers
    Pro: Good against Wedges and Rams.
    Con: Moderate damage, requires good driving skill
    RA205AAG ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: none that are famous
    A variation on the hammer bot is mounting them sideways. This is typically done 
    in pairs and has the two weapon heads converge somewhere in front. This is 
    about as close as this game comes to a crusher. For some reason, this has not 
    been implemented much in the real world. In a way, the design is somewhat like 
    combining a hammer and a thwack (plus a little bit of a clamp). This particular 
    type of weapon is a bit difficult to analyze since there are few examples. 
    Unlike normal hammers, side hammers don't have the advantage over wedges. They 
    do however possess easier invertibility. Side hammers have a very large attack 
    zone since they're traveling horizontally, not vertically. While you won't have 
    the damage values of a spinner, the range is very handy. As such, you don't 
    necessarily need as much finesse while driving. You can also sometimes thwack 
    with them if necessary.
    STRONG: boxy machines.
    WEAK: wedges
    Pro: Easier to aim and attack than overhead hammers
    Con: Moderate damage.
    RA205AAH ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Rammstein, Rhino
    In this game, are solely pneumatic. The game mechanics don't possess the 
    ability to pierce the opponent. Instead, the idea is taking the ram bot's 
    tactics and miniaturizing it down to just the weapon. This makes spears 
    slightly easier to control since backing off and ramming isn't required (but 
    helps). In fact, combining a ram bot chassis with pneumatic punchers is highly 
    recommended. Ideally, reach is the advantage of a punch bot, striking from a 
    safe distance. Spears also have a speed advantage; they posses fastest attack 
    rate in the game.
    This type fairs well in arenas with pits, allowing you to safely knock an 
    opponent into a hazard without the danger of overshooting (like a ram bot 
    does). Spear bots posses a small weapon profile -- often resembling a ram bot 
    array, making them less susceptible to spinners. In fact, with this game, you 
    can even hide the spike inside the chassis as a surprise attack. Of course, 
    savvy opponents will be suspicious, since your air gage is full. The easiest 
    opponent is one with box-like chassis and/or exposed wheels. Thwacks and rams 
    predominately fall into this category. You also get an edge against hammers, 
    being able to knock the opponent back and mess up the aim. 
    An alternative idea used by the an old robot called La Machine. The main weapon 
    was a wedge, but at the top was a pneumatic piston. Once the robot got 
    underneath the opponent, the piston was fired, doing some damage and also 
    usually flips the opponent over. It's similar in concept to a forward lifter.
    A disadvantage of spears is an even narrower attack range than hammers. This 
    can be compensated by having more pistons or more surfaces that are extended 
    (or a combination of both). Keep in mind, however, that this creates a danger 
    of creating massive lag on online games. Thus, only have as many pistons as 
    necessary (usually no more than 4). As with hammers, control is key. Spears 
    have a psychological disadvantage. Your opponent knows that you need a separate 
    source of power for your weapon. This means that your drive train, battery 
    power or armor is comparatively weaker to a ram bot of the same type. Wedges 
    are a difficult target since your attack will more likely bounce off and up. 
    This will knock your robot up into the air, often resulting in the wedge 
    gaining the upper hand.
    STRONG: Boxy robots (thwacks, rams), some hammers and face spinners
    WEAK: Wedges, 
    Pro: Fastest attack in the game. Extended pushing ability
    Con: Narrow and limited attack potential, requires a separate power source
    RA205AAI ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: the Master, Anklebiter (season 1-4), Ginsu, SOB, Low Blow
    In real life, saws suck virtually outright. In this game, they fair a little 
    better. Saws do a small amount of damage in a short amount of time. The goal 
    then is to keep the opponent in place long enough for the points to rack up. 
    The Battlebot SOB is a good design to base from. This involves a saw mounted on 
    servo arm. The weapon can be raised out of harms way and only be brought in 
    when you have a good hold on the opponent. Alternately, you can try mounting 
    them in the front of the wedge like Ankle Biter so that your wedge has extra 
    bite, even maybe flipping the opponent. The robot Low Blow employed an 
    interesting tactic of mounting the saw horizontally on top of a dome-like 
    chassis. However, in this game, you might as well just make it a spinner. 
    Compared to a spinner of similar diameter, the saw is lighter, possibly ideal 
    for the lower weight classes.
    Given their lackluster reputation in the real world and only moderate status in 
    the game, your opponent will probably not regard your weapon as very dangerous. 
    Saws are incredibly easy to knock off (by hammers and vertical spinners if 
    horizontal, and thwacks, spinners, and side hammers, if vertical). Do not use 
    them as drive wheels (like Ginsu) unless absolutely necessary. Your traction 
    and pushing ability is greatly reduced. In addition, they will be constantly 
    taking damage from the arena.
    STRONG: Any robot that you can get to stop moving
    WEAK: Just about anything else
    Pro: "Spinner lite"
    Con: Small damage, easily damaged
    RA205AAJ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Mauler, Hazard, Malvolio, Hypno-disc, Surgeon General
    Spinners are generally regarded as the most destructive machines in robotic 
    combat. It is basically the kinetic energy achieved by a hammer or a thwack, 
    except continuous and separate from the drive train. Spinners come in just 
    about any flavor. The advantage of spinners is that typically the spinner has a 
    large attack radius. This is an area that your opponent is going to try his/her 
    best to get around. If your spinner is all-encompassing (surrounds the 
    chassis), you effectively have an extra layer of armor -- a weapon that 
    functions as both offense and defense. Take a note, that as your spinner gets 
    up to speed, the chassis's going to want to turn in the opposite direction of 
    the rotating mass. How hard you turn depends on the mass of the spinner and the 
    motor powering it. Once it reaches full speed, control usually stabilizes. Just 
    know that this means that when you hit the opponent, you may have steering 
    problems afterwards as the spinner gets back up to speed. Jimxorb has 
    discovered that using servos as part of the drive train, can help steady the 
    robot. You may opt to shut off the spinner at the last second before impact and 
    then be able to retreat in a controlled manner. 
    The psychological aspects of a spinner against an opponent vary. The opponent 
    is generally going to be fearful (at worst, respectful) of your weapon and will 
    avoid it at all costs. On the other hand, some opponents (such as a ram bot) 
    may bite the bullet and just go straight at you. They know your weapon is the 
    result of sacrifices -- even neglect -- to your drive train. They have superior 
    pushing ability and will try to move you into a hazard or stop the spinner by 
    pinning you against a wall. They will also hope they can knock off a part of 
    your spinner, causing the spinner to become unbalanced or even come off 
    entirely. This will basically neuter your weapon since an unbalanced spinner is 
    in danger of spinning out and "pulling a Mauler." (For those who don't know, 
    it's like a watching a spinning coin backwards). It is often a good idea to 
    have both an analog switch and digital switches for your spinner. An analog 
    switch will allow you to spin at a slower speed, preventing a spin-out. Wedges 
    pose a problem depending on how low your spinner is mounted. Machines like 
    Hazard and Malvolio compensate by having wedges of their own. Malvolio also 
    employs mounting the bar at an angle, resulting in a lower kill area. Of 
    course, he loses the ability to strike anyone at his rear and sides. If you are 
    going to use an angled spinner, be sure to have some weapons to deter any 
    hammer robots aiming for the center connector. The steeper the angle (more than 
    45 degrees), the more your spinner becomes akin to a face spinner (see below). 
    Another machine, Code Black, has his blade mounted almost flush with the 
    ground. This makes getting under it virtually impossible, as well as gives him 
    perfect shots at his opponents wheels. This particular type is known as an 
    "Under-cutter." However, they can be difficult to build [effectively].
    In general, you're going to want to hit the opponent depending on which 
    direction you're spinning. If you're spinning left (counter-clockwise), you 
    should hit the left side [his left, your right] of the opponent. This will 
    knock the front end away from you, usually giving you access to his sides and 
    rear. In a spinner vs. spinner scenario [both normal or vertical), it usually 
    comes down to what your weapons are and where they're located. 
    Within Horizontal Spinners, weapon setups can be broken down into a few 
    categories: Blades/Bars, Discs, Cages, Shells.
    Blades and Bars (Hazard, Malvolio) are single rod-like spinner shapes. Blades 
    are usually when they're straight, bars can be any shape (curved, etc). In this 
    game, most Bar spinners have 2-3 appendages. Using a T connector or a Tribar, 
    these components will result in a comparatively lighter weapon. This means 
    faster spin-up times or weight that can be distributed elsewhere. [Long] Bars 
    are among the easiest spinners to stop. Also, since they have such a small 
    profile, it is very easy for the chassis to be attacked. The weapon itself 
    though, is often very durable (partially because it is hard to hit).
    Discs (Surgeon General, Hypnodisc) are one step up from bars. Usually 
    possessing 2-4 weapon heads (although the game gives you 8 attachment points, 
    using all 8 is difficult). A disc is heavier, and in this case more versatile 
    given the sizes available. However, it is easier to hit than a bar. This does 
    mean more protection from hammer bots. The rim of the disc can also keep robots 
    away from your chassis. Take your pick, do you risk taking damage to the 
    chassis, but have most of your weapon (bar). Or do you let your weapon take the 
    hit, saving your control board, but risk losing your weapon. An advantage of 
    discs in real robot combat, but not recommended in the game, is that discs can 
    be used to push around the opponent.
    Cage (Whyachi) are similar to a bar spinner, but with connections to prevent 
    easy access to the chassis. These are difficult to build in the game. The cage 
    often prevents rams and some spears from getting to your chassis, but hammers 
    can usually get past it.
    Shells (Ziggo, Phrizbee/Shredderator) are very difficult to make with standard 
    parts, but mean all-around protection from the sides and top. Shells are 
    extremely heavy, often meaning the weakest drive trains aside from FBS's. Lots 
    of attacking surfaces and lots of armor pieces make these tough to attack. 
    Beware the lifter that tries to get at your belly plate. The DSL:TC mod is the 
    best way to make this spinner variant.
    STRONG: any opponent with lots of external attachments (hammers, thwacks, 
         lifters, saws)
    WEAK: Well-armored ram bots, wedges, other spinners
    Pro: Damaging power surpassed only by FBS's
    Con: Usually weak drive trains, difficult to control during spin-up, 
    RA205AAK ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Nightmare, Backlash, Garm, 259, Heavy Metal Noise
    You've seen them on TV: the vertical discs of Nightmare and Backlash. A good 
    vertical spinner (spinning upwards) becomes something of a launcher, but also 
    has the damage qualities of a spinner. See the fight between Nightmare and Slam 
    Job as an example. You're going to want to have something directly under the 
    central axis of the spinning mass. For Backlash, you've seen that he has 
    casters in this location. This prevents the weapon from slamming into the floor 
    when you hit an opponent (it's also going to want to pitch forward when you 
    spin up, so distribute weight accordingly). You will also notice that Nightmare 
    has a wide stance and that Backlash has had these long balancing rods sticking 
    out the sides. These are designed to help keep the robot upright as it turns. 
    Adding side stabilizers will help in a big way. 
    One of the disadvantages of a vertical spinner is that it's attack zone 
    is fairly narrow. This means that you have to work harder to keep your weapon 
    aimed at your opponent (which is a bit ironic, given how hard it is to turn). 
    One way to compensate is to have multiple discs. This is recommended since with 
    just one disc, your robot can become side-heavy and easily tips over. Of course 
    the more discs you have, the more it is like a drum. The disc or bar on a 
    vertical spinner is inherently large, often at least twice the height of your 
    chassis. This makes being invertible difficult since ideally, your drive wheels 
    should be directly below the axis of the spinner. In this case, a reverse 
    switch for your spinner and hit it any time you start to leave the ground. This 
    is usually enough to keep yourself from flipping. It's also often enough flip 
    yourself back over if it happens, by striking the ground enough times. 
    Yes, it is possible to mount your drive motors in a way to achieve an angled 
    chassis like Nightmare. An RA2 robot known as Digital Apocalypse designed by 
    TDS is reportedly the first to achieve something like this. An interesting 
    design, DA also utilizes a powered steering unit at his rear, which vastly 
    makes turning ability more controllable. Bare in mind, however, this is one of 
    the most unstable robot designs. It is very easy to turn too quickly with this 
    design and the gyro-forces will flip you over. You may want to have your drive 
    axles inward oriented, this will slow down turning ability, but maintain 
    forward/backward strength. 
    Of all the weapon types, vertical spinners seem to be the most common to have 
    stacked motors. As stated, this can be dangerous. You risk being very unstable 
    and a complete physics anomaly. 
    Wedges are tough for vertical spinners since they require a surface to catch 
    on to be really effective. Hence, a pyramidal machine is a very difficult 
    target. Of course, one way to counter this is with a wedge of your own. 
    Historically, vertical spinners have not done well against horizontal spinners. 
    Basically, all you can do is slam hard and hope you flip him over. Hammer bots 
    with long reach may pose a problem, as they will be aiming for your 
    weapon motor, which is not easy to protect.
    STRONG: Boxy robots, robots with lots of attachments
    WEAK: Wedges, (some hammers & spinners)
    Pro: High damage, upwards lift (flipping)
    Con: Narrow attack zone, tall, unstable. 
    RA205AAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    examples: Little Drummer Boy, El Diablo
    An off-shot of the vertical spinner is the drum. By default, there is no drum 
    attachment. However, a make-shift drum can be achieved by taking a disc and 
    attaching wide weapon types to the edges (such as pick axes or lawnmower 
    blades). Downloadable components are also available. The advantage of a drum is 
    a wider attack zone. Almost always, the entire front of the robot becomes a 
    weapon. Generally smaller in diameter, drums do smaller hits, but reach top 
    speed much faster as well as easier to make invertible. It's common to see them 
    adopting ram-style chassis shapes. It is also easier to protect the spinner 
    motor. This usually removes the weakness hammers can exploit on vertical 
    spinners. As with vertical spinners, make sure you have some support underneath 
    the drum. Otherwise, during a hit, the drum will hit the arena floor. If the 
    motor is strong enough, it could very well start to flip the bot over.
    However, the lower, wider chassis shape is just begging to be hit. Wedges are 
    tough for this design as well.
    STRONG: Boxy robots, robots with lots of attachments
    WEAK: Wedges
    Pro: Better attack zone than vertical spinners
    Con: Smaller damage, 
    RA205AAM ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: B.O.B., 911
    Face spinners are kind of a cross between a vertical spinner and a drill. They 
    have the vertical spinner or drum's ability to toss a robot (on the edge that 
    spins up). Of course, this means that the other edge is striking down. One way 
    to compensate for this is to have at least 2 counter-rotating spinners on the 
    front of your robot. Don't make your spikes or striking appendages all the same 
    size. Have one set act as a protection for the disc, while another set is for 
    attack. The idea is to get enough spacing to achieve high damage points. 
    Like the drum, face spinners take up a good portion of the front end of the 
    robot. In addition, they are generally small in size, which makes for an 
    invertible design. Being small and numerous, face spinners are hard to stop. 
    This also means you can add more power to your drive train. 
    Unlike drums, spear bots have an advantage over face spinners in that they have 
    a clean shot at the center of your discs. Such a tactic would require superior 
    control and near-perfect aim. This is rare (especially online), but it is 
    reasonable to consider this scenario. Know which part of the disc is spinning 
    downward. This will make a big difference against a wedge, as the side that 
    spins down is going to pop your bot in the air, giving the wedge the advantage. 
    STRONG: Boxy robots, robots with lots of attachments
    WEAK: wedges, spears
    Pro: A bit more stable than vertical spinners and drums (driving wise)
    Con: Often limited in size (and hence, damage)
    Ra205AAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Examples: (virtually impossible nor practical in real life)
    Here is an interesting design. These are not quite the same as a stacked motor, 
    but the concept is similar. Complex spinners can be either parallel or 
    perpendicular. Starting out from a horizontal spinner (a vertical source just 
    self-destructs), stick either a disc or bar, then mount another set of motors. 
    If the axles of this second set are still like horizontal spinners, then this 
    is the parallel variety. Perpendicular are if axles are angled outward (90 
    degrees to the source), like rotating face spinners. The advantage of this 
    design is that even if the main spinner is stopped by a ram, the outer spinners 
    often still rotate. (The Battlebot AI pack's Phrizbee and a some of the 
    Starcore bots are complex spinners)
    Strong: Boxy, exposed chassis bots
    Weak: Well-armored machines
    Pro: Very difficult to completely stop
    Con: Difficult to build, incredibly unstable
    RA205AAO ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Y-POUT & Why-Not (sort of)
    Basically, this is a thwack that has translating ability. One way to achieve 
    this is to have an axle in the center of the base plate. Mounted to this are a 
    pair of servos. These become the drive motors. Mount some high-powered motors 
    on the outer edges. Set a switch that spins the outer motors in a single 
    direction and wire the servos like a drive train. This will cause the chassis 
    to spin at high speed, but the servos will remain stationary. 
    There is an alternative, which involves weight distribution, but the creator, 
    TDS, hasn't released his secrets, yet. You can try figuring it out if you want. 
    The strengths and weaknesses of this type of machine are the same as a spinner, 
    just extreme in both directions. Since the entire chassis is spinning, this 
    means a high-speed ~700kg machine of doom (these machines will invariably be 
    heavy weights). Normal spinners only get 1-2 (at most 3) motors powering their 
    weapons. A full body spinner has as many drive motors as you can fit into a 
    chassis (generally 4-6). This means extremely high spin speed without the 
    problems of stacking motors. People employing this design have had hits in 
    excess of 2000 points (one record of over 6000). 
    A disadvantage of this type of machine is that your drive train is pitiful if 
    you're using the servos. In fact, it's likely the worst drive train possible 
    (you will have zilch in the pushing department). Having a separate control for 
    the spin motors to act as drive motors is a good back-up plan. Of course, since 
    you're hitting with such high damage, there is a higher likelihood of breaking 
    your own robot's attachments with that same hit.
    STRONG: [Weak-armored] Boxy robots, robot with lots of attachments.
    WEAK: Well-armored ram bots, wedges
    Pro: Quite possibly the most damaging weapon type
    Con: The weakest drive train, can seriously hurt itself with the same hit
    RA205AAP ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    EXAMPLES: Daffodil
    Currently, this design has yet to be successful. The idea is to make a 
    cylindrical chassis. Mount the weapon motors, one facing the base, the other 
    facing the top. Your drive motors are then attached to the weapon motors. You 
    then have to get the robot to fall on its side. The chassis  becomes a gigantic 
    drum. The trick is preventing both drive pods from spinning. Also, since you're 
    tipping it on its side, control setup becomes problematic. You could do it with 
    a long rectangular chassis, I suppose.
    STRONG: n/a
    WEAK: n/a
    Pro: (Bragging rights?)
    Con: Currently unsuccessful design
    RA205AB +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Q: Why can't I get my wedge under the opponent?
    A: (Crazy sub-conscious says that sounds wrong... ) Try putting some ballast 
    in that particular section. This should weigh down that part of the chassis, 
    getting it lower and also should make it harder for the opponent to get 
    leverage. Keep in mind that batteries (for some reason) do not appear to have 
    any effect on weight distribution. Also try putting a caster on the opposite 
    end of the chassis to angle the front (or whichever side the wedge is on) down.
    Q: Can I make hinged wedges/skirts?
    A: No. Attaching a wedge on an axle mount will not work. The fact that the 
    game drops the robot a short distance before a fight often causes the wedges 
    to fold underneath itself, rendering them useless. Lu-Tze and the Ubermod have 
    come up with hinges, but really they're just extremely weak servos.
    Q: Why would I stack motors?
    A: RA2 lacks the ability to use chains or belts to have multiple motors power 
    an axle (as is common in real robot combat). Everything must be directly 
    mounted. RA2 builders have tried getting around this by stacking motors to get 
    increased speed and power. Despite this, the robot is going to be highly 
    unstable and often possesses a long spin-up time.
    Q: How do I stack motors?
    A: Stick a connector (most use "T" connectors) between the axle of the first 
    motor and the attachment point of the second one.
    Q: What about the cannon, flame thrower and the magnet?
    A: Those weapon types are available only after you use the cheatbot code. 
    They are not available online, so there's no real point in discussing them. 
    (Besides, they suck for the most part).
    Q: Are there any weapon types [popular in real robot combat] you're not 
    covering here?
    A: Yes. They are: Crushers (because the default mechanics can't achieve it), 
    Drills (because they suck more than saws)
    RA205B ************************************************************************
    Battlebot builder Christian Carlberg once said that drive train is the most 
    important part of the robot. You can see where he's coming from, in that as 
    long as you can move you won't get counted out. 
    More often than not, your weapon choice determines the type of drive train you 
    have. Other factors are the shape of you chassis and weight class. 
    This is a wheel number break down (that are touching the ground): 
    2 WHEELS: pretty much used for thwacks, as well as some hammers and spinners.   
         Driving in a straight line is difficult. Turning often over-shoots
    3 WHEELS: you are on crack 8P, Really, some do this to increase translation 
         speed and to slow down turning (ideal for spinners). If you try building   
         an auto-steering bot (aka Ackerman steering), you may need to put counter- 
         weights on the opposite side.
    4 WHEELS: good all-around. It may have some turning problems due to slippage.   
         Again, might be good for spinners, and to keep hammers from over-turning
    6 WHEELS: This is a fine compromise of turning and translating speed. 
         However, this is a lot of dedication to the drive train, so your weapon 
         and armor may start to suffer.
    8 OR MORE: You are almost certainly building a ram. With all those wheels and 
         motors, you're not going to have much for other active weapons. 
    Omni-Drive: This is a design that employs 4 motors (I suppose 3 or 6 could 
    work, as well), each at the corners of the chassis in an "X" shape. The result 
    is (with some additional wiring setups) the ability to side-step or "strafe" as 
    it is commonly known amongst FPS (first person shooters). The disadvantage of 
    this system is that the translation (forward, backward, & side-to-side) power 
    of the robot is greatly reduced compared to another machine with the same 
    motors mounted parallel. The only real up-side other than the novelty of side 
    movement is a very fast turn speed (ideal for thwacks). 
    Walkers: It is very difficult to build a walker in this game, and there's not 
    much incentive, given the lack of a bonus weight allowance present in most 
    robotic competitions. There are three types of walkers: 
    Thwack rollers, which are discs or tri-bars with weapon heads attached. These 
    are technically illegal walkers by Battlebot rules. They aren't much better 
    than using saws as wheels.
    Shufflers, are long bars that cam using axle mounts. 
    True Walkers, incredibly difficult to make and exceedingly unstable. 
    RA205BA +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Here's some numbers, courtesy of TDS: 
    (note: the mod also by TDS, the Ubermod, has different values)
    WEIGHT: in kg
    HP: hit points (if mounted externally)
    TORQUE: strength. Basically, this is how easily it can move a heavy object
    BATT. DRAIN: amount of power pulled per 20 seconds (see power stats)
    # (drive train possibilities)
    There are used for spinning wheels or weapons. Any of the controls (analog, 
    switch, button) can be wired to these.
    WEIGHT: 16
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 18
    TORQUE: 14
    BATT. DRAIN: 80
    2: good light weights, ok  middle weights
    4: great lightweight rams, good middle weight, ok for heavy spinners
    6 or more: good middle weight, ok heavy (but consider other motors)
    These are great because of their size and multiple attachments make them
    incredibly versatile. You will almost never use them for weapons (LW's only).
    Vertically, they are a little taller than z-teks.
    WEIGHT: 21
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 26
    TORQUE: 18
    BATT. DRAIN: 140
    2: very good light weight or middleweight
    4: good for middle weight rams, ok heavy
    6: decent heavy (will be on par with two z-teks)
    8 or more: Probably not necessary, try using z-teks instead
    Good speed, (slightly slower than a Z-tek, but lower torque). These are for 
    bots that need more control (versus using a z-tek) or just simply your machine 
    isn't tall enough to fit a z-tek. They will fit in a chassis at its lowest and 
    sub-lowest height. Fitted vertically, it's slightly taller than a vertical 
    right angle.
    WEIGHT: 25
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 36
    TORQUE: 24
    BATT. DRAIN: 200
    2: very good middle weight thwack (you can try putting it in a light weight)
    4: Good ram (see if you can upgrade to hp's, though)
    6 or more: very powerful ram bot (see if you can upgrade, though)
    Two words: Speed (&) Power. Z-teks will not fit in the shortest chassis 
    height. Raise the height measurement by half a scroll bar (kind of hard to 
    explain) and it will fit. They are basically the same height whether on its 
    side, or on its back.
    WEIGHT: 30
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 36
    TORQUE: 48
    BATT. DRAIN: 400
    2: try it in a middle weight thwack (good luck getting them in a light weight)
    4: Outstanding heavy ram.
    6 or more: virtually unstoppable heavy ram, but can be difficult to drive (and 
         will drain power like crazy)
    Three words: More Speed (&) Power. (Size is same as z-tek, of course) It is 
    also the motor of choice for driving weapons.
    POWERED STEERING UNIT (Narrow; Medium; Wide)
    WEIGHT: 50
    HP: N/A
    SPEED: 18
    TORQUE: 14
    BATT. DRAIN: 80
    This seems to be a matter of taste and what you intend to do. It can help 
    achieve a more controlled turn on some robots (good for big vertical spinners). 
    If you need to turn completely around quickly, doing a bunch of short 3-point 
    turns (consult a DMV manual)usually does the trick.
    Here's a different way of looking at it, if your head is whirling from all 
    those numbers:
    4 z-teks(hp) ~= 10 redbirds ~= 20 right angles
    These will be your motors to self-right and/or lift/hammer with. These can only 
    have a button wired to them. They have also been cleverly been used to mount 
    spinner motors in positions the game would normally not allow (intersecting the 
    chassis, for example). Just know that it will probably wobble a bit.
    SNAPPER II (hidden -- must be unlocked via RFSoftware's pack)
    WEIGHT: 13
    HP: N/A
    BURST: 0 20 25
    SPEED: 4
    TORQUE: 5
    BATT. DRAIN: 400 
    This thing is pitifully weak. It can only be attached to the baseplate.
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~400)
    BURST: 0 40 60
    SPEED: 4
    TORQUE: 25
    BATT. DRAIN: 300 
    Works best for the smaller weight classes. It is about the same size as a 
    right-angle motor.
    WEIGHT: 30
    HP: (~400)
    BURST: 0 50 90
    SPEED: 5
    TORQUE: 35
    BATT. DRAIN: 500
    Ideal for the middle and heavy classes. It is about as tall as a z-tek.
    These items are unique in that they resist any outside force and usually stay 
    in the position they are in. In general, servos are for a slow, controlled way 
    of changing the position of something. Usually it's adjusting the angle of a 
    weapon head.
    SERVO 302 (small servo)
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 3
    TORQUE: 26
    BATT. DRAIN: 50
    Horizontally, about the same height of a [horizontal] red bird. Mounted 
    vertically, its close to a black batt. 
    SERVO 502 (big servo)
    WEIGHT: 30
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 4
    TORQUE: 40
    BATT. DRAIN: 90
    On its side, ~same height of a horizontal pink batt. On its base, about the 
    height of a large air tank.
    SERVO 702 (Big flat servo)
    WEIGHT: 30
    HP: (~400)
    SPEED: 4
    TORQUE: 40
    BATT. DRAIN: 90
    Mounted vertically, roughly that of a [horizontal] pink batt in height.  On its 
    side, the same as a large air tank.
    RA205BB +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Q: Why don't you get detailed about some of this stuff?
    A: The game came with a great set of tutorials to help you (there's a folder 
    marked as such in the RA2 directory)
    Q: I've seen many robots with motors mounted externally. Why should I do this?
    A: The quick answer is simply because the part doesn't fit inside the allotted
    chassis space. (Or, you're building a DA/Nightmare vertical spinner) However,
    many people have found that by putting a motor outside, space that would have
    normally been needed to accommodate it can either be eliminated altogether (to
    save weight) or be used for something else (more power sources for example).
    And as said, motors externally mounted aren't limited by the chassis shape. The
    disadvantage that come with this is the increased vulnerability of your motors.
    In order to protect them, often a rather elaborate framework of extenders is
    needed. In addition, it increases the likely-hood of a havok explosion.
    Spinners are the most common weapons type to employ this method. 
    Q: Where can I get tank treads?
    A: There are no tank treads. As it stands, there is no way to have treads in 
    the game. You have probably seen a custom machine by Dummee which only appears 
    to have treads, but uses normal wheels. That, or you're thinking of the first 
    game (and no, exporting that model does not work) or some other game. 
    Lu-Tze did release a component that resembles tank treads, but they too are not 
    real treads.
    RA205BC +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Don't ever assume you can't be flipped over. Sure, you might have a design 
    where the other robots might not be able to flip you completely over, but 
    consider things like the hellraisers in the Octagon Arena and the dreaded Havok 
    explosions. You cannot travel the road of Bio-hazard, who is not invertible, 
    and just make it hard to get under you. 
    Not to re-word an old car slogan, but "Lower is better." This makes it much 
    easier to be invertible, plus it makes for a lower center of gravity, so the 
    risk of being flipped is reduced.
    General rule of thumb is to make your robot invertible if possible. There are 
    several ways to do this:
    One way is to simply use wheels that have a diameter large enough to stick out 
    enough on both the top and bottom. The problem inherent with this method is 
    that when you get flipped, you're controls are now reversed. Unlike what most 
    builders do, you can't just flip a switch and invert your controls (and if you 
    can, I want to know where you got it). The counter for this is to have another 
    set of controls. This means you have to have an extra 2 slots in the control 
    box. Generally this is not a problem, however this often limits you to using 
    the keyboard. 
    Another method is to have an extra set of free-spinning wheels towards the top. 
    This set of wheels are wired in such a way that when flipped, you can still 
    drive normally without changing controls. The Robot Wars bot Pussy Cat follows 
    this idea. The problem with this method is that at a given time, this set of 
    motors will drain battery power even if they're not touching the ground. 
    There also has been methods that mount the motors on servos or linear actuators 
    that changes the drive train layout of the robot. There are a few problems with 
    this. One is that often the controls are still reversed depending on how 
    they're mounted. Also consider that servos are painfully slow, meaning there 
    are precious seconds in which you are vulnerable trying to reconfigure. Lastly, 
    this is a lot of complicated attachments to the drive train, compromising 
    weapons, armor, etc. Tacking on to that, all those parts will increase the lag 
    in online play.
    For self-righting, the sure-fire way is to use burst motors. It's usually 
    pretty simple, just follow something similar to Minion or Hypnodisc.
    Don't use the burst pistons for self-righting. It's a flaw in the physics 
    engine which doesn't follow Newton's 3rd law. That is, the every action causes 
    equal reaction. In this case, there's no reaction. Most of the times, firing 
    the pistons results in nothing. Although if you follow that logic, you could 
    theoretically try mounting the piston the opposite way to try to shift enough 
    weight to flip over.
    If anything, at least make sure you can move around after being flipped. 
    Vertical spinners could use their weapon disc, spears can scoot around by the 
    burst pistons. 
    For spinners and some Face spinners, you can use something akin to Ziggo's 
    flag. Mount somewhere in the chassis an extender that offsets the bot when it's 
    upside down such that the spinning causes it to flip over. You do not want this 
    mounted in the center for easier righting. If you have it either tall enough or 
    sufficiently offset, this can actually apply to some of the other weapon types 
    as long as a wheel also touches the ground. At this point, all you have to do 
    is spin in place at full speed. Eventually centripetal acceleration will get 
    you back on both wheels.
    If your spinner is mounted on a burst motor, than you usually can just use that 
    to self-right. You do run the risk of breaking your spin motor.
    RA205BCA ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    MISC. SRM Q'S:
    Q: Why should I build a self-righting mechanism or make my robot invertible? 
    [Favorite Robot] doesn't have anything like that.
    A: [Favorite Robot]'s builder also likely spent at least $800 (usually in 
    excess of $2000) and at least a month of designing and actual building. You 
    spent ~$20 [plus S&H] and maybe 1-3 hours before you had a good working robot. 
    Even then, you'll notice that builders are trying to build self-righting  
    capability into their machine more and more.
    RA205BD +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    BURST PISTON (60; 80; 100; 120)
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~400) 
    Speed: 60 
    Torque: 100
    AIR. DRAIN: 100
    Burst pistons are for extending something in a split second and then quickly 
    retract. This is the core concept behind the spear-type weapons. You lash out 
    quickly at the opponent, or reach further than he can.
    Take note that [for all of these] the length does not change the weight. The 
    deciding factor is usually where you're putting it.
    Air servos/linear actuators.
    Like motor servos, these are used to adjust the position of something. Mostly, 
    used to extend a weapon head forward for attack, and then bring it back in out 
    of harms way. 
    SERVO PISTON (60; 80; 100; 120)
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~400)
    Speed: 1 
    Torque: 20
    AIR. DRAIN: 80
    The action is like the burst piston, just now the in-out can now be [slowly] 
    LINEAR ACTUATOR (60; 80; 100; 120)
    WEIGHT: 23
    HP: (~400)
    Speed: 1 
    Torque: 20
    AIR. DRAIN: 80
    Similar to the servo piston, these have the sliding part on the side instead.
    RA205C ************************************************************************
    This is a supplement of both weapons and mobility. Batteries and air tanks are 
    the source of energy that allows these systems to run. Without power, you can't 
    move nor have an effective weapon. One way to think about the power system is 
    like a giant dam full of water. When the dam is full there is much more pres-
    sure than when it is half full. The same applies to the power meters. Once the 
    meter goes down, your strength will start to decrease. Power levels are maxed 
    out at the beginning of every match (and by default, there is no way to get 
    back lost power).
    RA205CA +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    All right, you stat fiends, here's some more numbers:
    POWER: Take the total battery drain numbers of your motors and multiply that by 
    9 (to equal 3 minutes). That number is how much total power you will need.
    AMPS: This designates how much power can be dished out at a given time. This is 
    very important depending on how much is being pulled by your motors. The total 
    number of amps should be at least equal to the total battery drain.
    WEIGHT: 8
    POWER: 7000
    AMPS: 100
    Like right angle motors, are small and can fit in tight places (also a bit 
    more versatile with two attachment points). However, they are the least 
    efficient for their weight. Mounted vertically, they are about the same height 
    as a vertical right angle motor.
    WEIGHT: 16
    POWER: 24000
    AMPS: 400 
     An in-between, but their height is a disadvantage. Because of that, the least 
    versatile. They're about the same height as a z-tek.
    WEIGHT: 30
    POWER: 52000
    AMPS: 800
    This is very powerful. Not only that, but it can fit in a bot of lowest 
    chassis height (but not at sub-lowest). If you have the chassis tall enough to 
    fit a z-tek, a control board can fit over a black bat. (Naturally, the same 
    goes for 3 pink batts, but you'd probably use a black batt instead anyway)
    Again, here's another equation that simplifies it a bit:
    1 black ~= 2 reds ~= 8 pink
    What does this mean? If you have 3 pink batts next to each other, they are 
    slightly thinner, shorter and lighter than a single black batt. However, a 
    black batt is almost 3 times as powerful. 
    Rules of thumb:
    Place a black batt whenever possible
    1 black batt for every z-tek on the robot
    1 pink for every right angle
    RA205CB ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    RA205CC +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    WEIGHT: in kg
    PSI: just like battery power
    Flow Rate: just like the amps measurement
    CO2 TANK 
    WEIGHT: 10
    PSI: 800
    Flow Rate: 120
    Pretty standard. Fits in the lowest and sub-lowest chassis. Height is between a 
    red bird and a right-angle.
    CO2 TANK 
    WEIGHT: 14
    PSI: 2000
    Flow Rate: 200
    The hard part is how big this thing is. It's about as tall as a z-tek
    RA205D ************************************************************************
    This is an area that often gets the least bit of attention when building a 
    robot. There are 4 armor sets (plastic, aluminum, titanium and steel) which 
    increase in toughness and weight. It is also a good practice to use 
    ram plates, snow plows and/or some weapon heads to create an extra layer of 
    protection. This applies especially to spinners, who tend to dedicate more 
    weight towards their weapon. 
    There's a typo in the manual. The left number is the weight and the right 
    number is the strength.
    STRENGTH: 80
    WEIGHT: 8
    Unless you're in the low weight classes (or building an ant), you had better 
    have sufficient external protection. 
    STRENGTH: 100
    WEIGHT: 12
    Default armor and about average. You can certainly get by in any of the weight 
    classes with it. Besides, I like the texture 8P.
    STRENGTH: 150
    WEIGHT: 16
    An in between of steel and aluminum. 
    STRENGTH: 175
    WEIGHT: 20
    Strong, but as one can imagine, very heavy. Take note, that the heavier the 
    robot, the more work your motors have to do.
    RA205DA +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    RA205E ************************************************************************
    These are pieces used to do their name sake. They should never intentionally be 
    used as weapons. (The default parts; custom parts are another issue)
    ("NI" means "Need Info") (some alternative names for parts are in parenthesis)
    ANGLE CONNECTOR (90; 67.5; 45; 22.5)
    WEIGHT: 4
    HP: (~100)
    WEIGHT: 11
    HP: (~100)
    BASEPLATE ANCHOR (0; 22.5; 45; 67.5; 90)
    WEIGHT: 5
    HP: N/A
    DISC (60; 80; 100; 120; 140)
    WEIGHT: 15; 17; 19; 21; 23
    HP: 500
    FRACTURE: 20
    Standard spinner weapon piece.
    ROTATOR BAR (tri-bar, whyachi-like bar)
    WEIGHT: 14
    HP: 500
    FRACTURE: 20
    Lighter than the discs, but at a fixed size. The width between the rotors is 
    usually not much of an issue, but it can make spin-up time difficult if the 
    opponent is really close.
    ROUND EXTENDER (20; 40; 60; 80; 100; 120; 140)
    WEIGHT: 2; 4; 6; 8; 10; 12; 14
    HP: (~100)
    SQUARE EXTENDER (20; 40; 60; 80; 100; 120; 140)
    WEIGHT: 5; 10; 15; 20; 25; 30
    HP: (~100?)
    Use these for a stronger mount, usually required for weapon booms and mounting 
    motors. They're also just easier to build with.
    WEIGHT: 5
    HP: (~100)
    WEIGHT: 6
    HP: (~100)
    RA205F ************************************************************************
    Minus the casters, wheels can only be mounted to axles. Diameter and Thickness 
    are currently in ranking from smallest to largest (1-9). I may do measurements 
    if I have time.
    BALANCE CASTER (10; 15; 20; 25)
    WEIGHT: 6 
    HP: N/A
    I don't think you can knock these off and frankly, shouldn't even try. Remember 
    these weigh the same regardless of height and also that they stick out further 
    than you think.
    BUZZARD WHEEL (Team Toad wheels, yellow wheels)
    WEIGHT: 17
    HP: (~400)
    Diameter: 3
    This wheel if often forgotten and not used. But then, there's nothing really 
    special about it. You would use it for a Team Toad replica or to offset the 
    sides without having to add extra spikes. They are the widest of the small 
    wheels, which can give you better traction.
    WEIGHT: 20
    HP: (~400)
    Diameter: 7
    I don't like these wheels. Their rounded shape often has problems balancing. 
    N-12's fare much better.
    MINI WHEEL (Hazard wheels; Colsons) (Personally, I swap the map to grey color)
    WEIGHT: 17
    HP: (~275)
    Diameter: 1 (~1x1)
    These are really small and ideal for robots that need concealed wheels.
    MUD TIRE (hidden)
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~425)
    Diameter: 8
    Slightly taller and narrower than the N-12's. Otherwise nearly identical.
    N-12 WHEEL (Nightmare wheels; NPC wheels)
    WEIGHT: 22
    HP: (~400)
    Diameter: 6
    I like these wheels, but they're heavy, so often this restricts them to the 
    latter weight classes. The wide, flat tread is ideal for rams.
    WEIGHT: 17
    HP: (~500)
    Diameter: 2
    Bigger than the mini-wheels, but about the same thickness.
    WEIGHT: 12
    HP: (~550?)
    Diameter: 4
    These are the lightest wheels, and hence perfect for light and middle weights 
    or robots on a weight budget. At lowest chassis height, this can cover both top 
    and bottom if the axle is mounted at middle height.
    WEIGHT: 20
    HP: (~400)
    Diameter: 9
    By far the wheel with the largest diameter. These are the easiest to use to 
    make a robot invertible.
    SLIPPER-BOTTOM WHEEL (Wheelchair wheels; grey wheels, granny wheels)
    WEIGHT: 18
    HP: (~450)
    Diameter: 5
    Larger diameter than the Buzzard wheels, but thinner.
    RA205G ************************************************************************
    PIERCE: Additional damage to chassis and internals
    CONCUSSION: Additional damage to components
    WEIGHT: 12
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .4
    Average by most regards. Two attachment points has seen it used for everything 
    from lifters to side guards.
    WEIGHT: 20
    HP: (~1000)
    PIERCE: .4
    It's size and reach is its advantage (aside from the katana).
    BLADE (40; 60; 80; 100)(Razor blades)
    WEIGHT: 10; 12; 14; 16
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .3
    Personally, I find these things to be too heavy to be very useful. At their 
    longest length, they make for good drum weapons, though. Do note that the side 
    that actually cuts is the larger triangular edge (don't look at it as if it's 
    an exacto blade). 
    WEIGHT: 13
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .4
    In general, these do more damage than Axe Heads, although less versatile.
    WEIGHT: 20
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .3
    Don't implement them for the obvious use. Blade/bar spinners don't do quite as 
    well since the physics engine doesn't seem to calculate tip speed on a spinning 
    [solid] object. Instead, use it for external armor or to make drum shapes.
    SAMURAI SWORD (hidden) (katana)
    WEIGHT: 14
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .3
    I've found it to be excellent for hammer-style weapons, as well as good guard 
    rails. They also make for good Ziggo-style righting bars. However, it seems to 
    make for lousy spinner weapons. 
    WEIGHT: 25
    HP: (~1050)
    The two attachments provide good versatility. Use for anything that swings in 
    only one direction. Has been used as spear point weapons to good effect.
    IRON FIST (hidden)
    WEIGHT: 18
    HP: NI
    Generally speaking, these do more damage and seem to have more hit points than 
    sledge hammers.
    WEIGHT: 30
    HP: NI
    Basic heavy thwacking object. Being double-sided, is good for spinners. They 
    seem to stand up to more punishment than the battle axe.
    These can only be mounted to axles. Most of them can pass through the chassis.
    WEIGHT: 12
    HP: NI
    NINJA STAR (hidden)
    WEIGHT: 8
    HP: NI
    A bit small to be of any real use. These cannot intersect the chassis.
    SAW BLADE (60; 80; 100; 120; 140)
    WEIGHT: 16; 18; 20; 22; 24
    HP: NI
    Spikes generally can intersect the chassis
    IRON SPIKE (Dark spike) 
    WEIGHT: 10
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .8
    Good length and decent in most regards. 
    POINTY TIP (Short fat spikes)
    WEIGHT: 8
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: 1
    This spike cannot intersect the chassis. As such, not used much.
    POLE SPIKE (30; 50; 70) (Round skinny spikes)
    WEIGHT: 8; 12; 16
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: 1
    They're a bit on the heavy side. They can fit in some areas better due to their
    thin profile.
    WEIGHT: 7
    HP: 500
    PIERCE: 1
    They're light weight and rather wide shape is their advantage. The fins do give 
    it slightly odd collision values. 
    WEIGHT: 14
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .8
    Really long and nasty looking 8P. These have been used to make good lifters.
    BEAR CLAW (hidden)
    WEIGHT: 8
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .3 
    Has not seen extensive use in the RA2 community.
    ICE PICK (Pick Axe)
    WEIGHT: 16; 8
    HP: (~1050)
    PIERCE: .8 
    The single spike version has slightly different collision values than the 
    double-sided. In fact, the single-sided are ideal for hammers and vertical 
    spinners. The double sided is good for spinners that need to spin both ways, 
    drums and for extra defense.
    WEIGHT: 10
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .5
    WEIGHT: 14
    HP: NI
    PIERCE: .5
    It's shape alludes to good drum attachments.
    RA205H ************************************************************************
    These are miscellaneous pieces that usually aren't used to attack. However, 
    some parts have been used as weapons.
    WEIGHT: 16
    HP: (~1004)
    These have been used as wheel guards, as well. The narrow prongs may make it
    difficult to get under an opponent.
    WEIGHT: 14
    HP: 600
    FRACTURE: 20
    Use these over the Bracket wedges if you can. Their wide shape can be used for 
    some protection.
    BALLAST (10; 20; 40)
    WEIGHT: 10; 20; 40
    HP: N/A
    WEIGHT: 12
    HP: (~1092)
    Not very useful as lifters for the larger weight classes. It has been used for 
    stabilizers on vertical spinners. In theory, it is the lowest-reaching lifter 
    WEIGHT: 10
    HP: (~1168)
    SNOWPLOW [SD Plow is identical]
    WEIGHT: 16
    HP: (~1043)
    The advantage here is their width combined with the sloped edge.
    WEIGHT: 20
    HP: 1000
    FRACTURE: 40
    These are your best external defense. Some have used them as weapon heads.
    RA205I ************************************************************************
    Some parts have weird collision values, so if something won't fit, rotate it on 
    its mount -- sometimes that works.
    RA205IA +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Q: How do I attach a component in a different orientation?
    A: All right, when you select a component you will notice that a small cube is 
    glowing bright green. This is an attachment point. Depending on the part, you 
    can see other cubes, just a duller shade of green. You may have to rotate the 
    part using the right mouse button. By clicking (left mouse button) on any of 
    the dull green cubes will highlight it. This now makes it the current 
    attachment point. Anyone who has played the game Roboforge will be slightly 
    familiar with this process. 
    Q: Where do I get all this custom stuff?
    A: See the links section.
    Q: What is this "sub-lowest" height you keep talking about?
    A: There's the [generally accepted] lowest chassis height, which is what you 
    get when you scroll the slider all the way to the bottom. However, there is a 
    trick to go even lower. Raise the slider to maximum, and then click on the area 
    for lowest height. The slider should jump to that position, but the chassis 
    will be much thinner. 
    RA206 =========================================================================
    These are the default AI opponents in the game. I've divided it up by weight 
    class, starting with the heavy weights.
    RA206A ************************************************************************
    This will likely be a common weight class for you given the huge range of what 
    counts as a heavy. Most of the opponents (minus EMERGENCY) will be fairly easy.
    TEAM: Redzone
    WEIGHT: 426
    DRIVE: 2 red birds, 1 power steering
    ARMOR: steel
    WEAPON: Lifter (Bracket Wedge)
    DIFFICULTY: very easy
    You will encounter this guy often and have probably fought him many times  
    during exhibition matches by default. He's not invertible, so flip him all you 
    want. Give the lifter a respectful distance, however. More than anything, 
    practice getting around to his wheels. He uses auto steering, so his driving is 
    really lousy. This guy seems to have a strange attraction to the arena wall.
    TEAM: Prehistoric
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 514
    DRIVE: 2 zteks
    WEAPON: Hammer (Battle axe)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    Never underestimate the hammer bots. This guy's axe can take off almost any 
    extender with one hit, motors and wheels in 2-3. The axe gives him a reach 
    advantage, being the longest of the hammer bots. However, it is also the 
    narrowest, so dodging to the left or right is fairly easy. With a 
    forward-mounted ram plate, all frontal attacks are for only the 
    bravest/strongest. Get at those over-sized wheels as much as you can. You'd 
    think with those wheels, he'd be invertible, but he's out of luck. Despite 
    possessing the strongest motors of the hammer bots, he is a lousy driver and 
    it's fairly easy to get around (he shares Sentinel's love for walls). Grog 
    doesn't seem to have the same self-righting prowess as the others. The back 
    wheels aren't powered, so don't bother attacking them unless necessary. It's 
    kind of sad, since the design itself is ok.
    TEAM: Good Ol' Boys
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 424
    DRIVE: 2 redbirds, 1 power steering
    WEAPON: Dual Hammers (Bear Claws)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    Fairly straight forward. The claws are individually actuated, and thus don't 
    seem to do as much damage as the others. This guy uses auto steering, making 
    him a lousy driver. His armor is the weakest of the hammer-types, plus his wide 
    chassis makes for a big target. On top of it all, his wheels are exposed (and 
    not invertible, no less).
    TEAM: Dragon
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 406.3
    DRIVE: 2 ztek(hp)s
    WEAPON: Wedge, (4 pole spikes)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    (bears no resemblance to the Battlebot of the same name) Want to know why no 
    one likes wedges in Battlebots? This machine is quite effective. His wedge is 
    not to be underestimated. He's invertible, although his effectiveness decreases 
    drastically. His sides are defended by spikes, making the most likely area to 
    attack difficult. On top of it all, his wheels are enclosed, so only a hammer 
    bot or a spinner at the correct height is going to knock them out. He is one of 
    the better drivers of the weight class. Keep in mind that he has no weapon 
    minus the wedge when ramming, so he can damage himself if you have a good, 
    powerful weapon up front. Likewise, hammers have the biggest advantage, here. 
    His shape has proven a disadvantage in some arenas with ramps and he gets high-
    centered. Take advantage of this and try leading him into one (just don't get 
    high-centered, yourself). Play this guy in exhibitions a lot, especially to 
    test your own wedge/flippers.
    TEAM: Black Storm
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 453.3
    DRIVE: 4 zteks
    WEAPON: Face Spinner (2 Iron Spikes), Ram
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    Dangerous if you're not careful. The disc has an annoying tendency to stay 
    attached. I believe this is due to that a right angle motor powers his weapon. 
    This makes him more of a rammer with an actuated weapon, than a true face 
    spinner. Its own wheels are enclosed and is invertible. The good news is that 
    he has weak armor, so a few good hits and he's dead. Lifters/Launchers can try 
    getting him stuck on his side.
    TEAM: Spark:
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 795.8
    DRIVE: 4 ztek(hp)s
    WEAPON: Lifters (2 Emergency Flippers), Rammer (4 Ramplates)
    DIFFICULTY: very hard
    Just by reading those stats, it is very apparent this is one nasty robot. 
    Unlike a lot of the other machines, there is not a glaring flaw in this guy's 
    design. He's the only one to actually take advantage of the 800 kg weight 
    limit. He has the fastest motors and he has the strongest armor. Quite frankly, 
    he is an excellent ram-lifter. I think this thing was inspired by Vlad the 
    Impaler and just as effective. His lifters _will_ get under you and you _will_ 
    visit a wall. His entire front is guarded by 4 ram plates, and he's pretty good 
    at keeping that aimed at you. If he has his lifters, he's even able to even 
    flip himself over if inverted. This is one of the few machines that pins. 
    Sometimes, he'll even stay there even if his own countdown starts. If you both 
    tie at the immobile countdown, you still lose. So if you get pushed against a 
    wall, my advice is to flail (struggle) for all it's worth to hope he backs off. 
    This will be a tough fight. Vertical spinners/drums that can take off the 
    wedges will have the edge here. It's hard, but try to get him to misfire with 
    his flipper and then just charge in. You may be even able to flip him over. Use 
    arenas with ramps to your advantage since his flippers won't be flush with the 
    ground. All the other weapon types will just have to out-maneuver him. For 
    spinners, you had better have a decent drive train to maneuver or the ability 
    to kill in 2-3 hits, because this guy is practically a spinner-killer.
    TEAM: Spike Heads
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 528.8
    DRIVE: 2 ztek(hp)s
    WEAPON: Inverted Thwack (2 Hammers Heads)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    This guy poses an interesting challenge. His tactics involve a kind of inverted 
    thwack by smacking you around with those hammers. He does this very well. In 
    addition, he can run inverted. The best thing to do is knock those extenders 
    off ASAP and then go for his exposed wheels. The arms are actuated, but he 
    never uses them.
    TEAM: NorthPolers
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 484.7
    DRIVE: 4 ztek(hp)s
    WEAPON: Ram (snow plow)
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    Kinda looks like Frostbite, but sucks. Other than the fact that this guy will 
    try ramming you at high speeds, there isn't much of a threat. His driving is 
    somewhere between lousy and so-so. His wheels are exposed. That snowplow is 
    usually ripped off by most decent spinners. On top of it all, he's not 
    invertible (although sometimes shifts/slides around for unknown reasons -- get 
    him into a corner)
    TEAM: High Voltage
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 405.7
    DRIVE: 2 zteks
    WEAPON: Spear (4 Pointy Tips)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    The token spear bot of the weight class. This thing can be difficult since the 
    spikes take up most of the front of the machine, and it is a very wide robot. 
    His drive train pretty much lets him turn on a dime, so other spears and 
    hammers will probably have some problems. On the plus side, he's not 
    invertible. However, note that he can still scoot around using the piston, so 
    either kill him or push him into a wall/corner. 
    TEAM: Hex
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 410.3
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Lifter (Iron Spike)
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    This guy is about as lousy as he sounds. Seriously, if you can't take this guy 
    down, you need to re-think your design, or might have entered the wrong weight 
    class. His lifter will do more damage than Sentinel, but barely counts for 
    much. The only thing to look out for is if the spike gets under any external 
    defenses and hits the extenders, wheels or motors. He has sloped front and 
    sides, but has a lot of ground clearance (for a lifter), so just about anything 
    can get under him. He's a rotten driver and he's got a high center of gravity 
    so tipping him's easy. 
    TEAM: Z
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 429.3
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Ram (2 Pole Spikes)
    difficulty: medium-easy
    An annoying push bot. He hardly ever rams, nor does he really have the drive 
    train for it. This guy is invertible, and has enclosed wheels. Ideally, 
    spinners will want to attack him from the sides or rear, since those spikes are 
    a bit resilient. His chassis is lower than Coal Miner, which makes knocking him 
    on his side harder, but it is possible. The only difficulty this guy poses is 
    that often the only way to win is by beating the guy into submission.
    BIG DOG:
    TEAM: SteelYard Dog
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 529.0
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Ram (SD Snow plow), rear ramplate
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    Rather reminiscent of Punjar. This guy is very similar to Snow Job except the 
    wheels aren't exposed. He isn't as fast, but a slightly better driver. Despite 
    the slot on the front of his chassis, his plow isn't actuated. Take advantage 
    of his lack of speed to get at those exposed sides. This guy's low ground 
    clearance sometimes gets him in trouble in arenas with ramps.
    TEAM: Riot
    WEIGHT: 518.8
    DRIVE: 4 red birds
    ARMOR: steel
    WEAPON: Hammer (2 Ice Picks), side spike strips
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    Raptor is arguably the hardest of the AI hammer bots of the weight class. Using 
    the dual pick axes, he has a wider strike area than any of the others and his 
    sides have a spike strip guarding his wheels. Strangely, he seems to take 
    damage easily from spinners (I've killed him faster than Deadbeat).
    TEAM: Megaton
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 434.8
    DRIVE: 2 redbirds, 2 right angles
    WEAPON: Hammer (Sledge Hammer)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    I think the second hardest of the hammer bots. It's pretty good at keeping 
    itself from being tipped over. In fact, if left alone long enough (it takes a 
    while), I've seen it right itself after being completely inverted. Those front 
    wheels are rather easy to hit, although he's a better driver than Grog. The 
    back wheels are powered (but he's only able to drive forward or backward with 
    them), so you'll have to take those out or flip him over.  
    TEAM: Scrapper
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 531.6
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Spinner (4 disc-mounted Axe Heads)
    DIFFICULTY: medium
    The big spinner of the weight class is only moderately difficult. The axes(the 
    connectors behind them to be more precise) come off pretty easily, as does the 
    disc itself. Hammer bots are going to want to aim directly for the center of 
    the disc like it's a bull's-eye. He's not invertible, but if he still has the 
    disc, he can flail about the arena (and sometimes right himself) and his rear 
    wheels stick out such that he can roll around if on his rear. The wedge body 
    usually doesn't come in to play unless you've knocked the front wheels off. If 
    the disc is gone, but the front wheels remain, he can sometimes get some grip 
    and move around if flipped over. It is possible to carve out that z-tek on the 
    front, so be careful of Havok explosions.
    RA206B ************************************************************************
    MIDDLEWEIGHTS: (250-398.9)
    This is a common weight class for online tournaments since given the weight 
    restriction, is less likely to cause lag. The also means the way you balance 
    OMD is more of an issue. Hammers in particular will have it tough in this 
    weight class since there are 2 spears, 3 hammers and 1 good spinner. These 
    AI are somewhat unique in that about a third of them are actually overweight. 
    TEAM: Red Zone
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 373.1
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Spear (Hammer Head)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    This guy is just plain annoying. Since he has the hammer head on the piston, 
    he has a very large attack range. He has a decent turning ability, so getting 
    around him is difficult. Not only that, but his sides are angled, giving some 
    spinners a hard time. The robots with the hardest time are going to be 
    hammers, other spears and possibly face spinners.
    TEAM: Prehistoric
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 409.9
    DRIVE: 2 zteks
    WEAPON: Inverted Thwack (2 Ice Picks)
    DIFFICULTY: medium
    You'd think they'd design this guy to be invertible, but no, he's not. 
    Basically, you treat him like a much weaker Little Metal Friend. Maybe it's the 
    angle of the arms or the more flighty weight class, but I've found it harder to 
    get around him than LMF. Don't try hitting him in the front because of the 
    forward ramplate. Hammers can hit over it, but spears may have problems.
    TEAM: Good Ol' Boys
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 418.6
    DRIVE: 4 red birds
    WEAPON: Dual Hammer (2 Fireman axes)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    I suppose I could give creative points of this guy looking like a monster 
    truck, but I won't. He's fairly easy just in the fact that his wheels are such 
    easy targets. Just be careful about Havok explosions. Since he has two hammers, 
    his weapon is pretty fast.
    TEAM: Dragon
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 406.0
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Hammer (Samurai Sword)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-hard
    This guy features a part normally not available to you: the katana. This gives 
    him damage down the entire length of the weapon, longer than the battle axe, 
    but at almost half the weight. His reach is formidable and the damage is 
    deadly, especially in this weight class. On the plus side, he's not invertible.
    TEAM: Black Storm
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 387.9
    DRIVE: 2 ztek(hp)s
    WEAPON: Wedge, (Iron Spikes)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    Given the team name, this bot seems so random . . . This is a wedge, so his 
    difficulty is dependent on your ground clearance and your drive train. He does 
    sport spikes on the top, but they almost never come into play. However, they do 
    make him surprisingly difficult to flip over. His wheels still touch the ground 
    if you stick him on his rear, so don't try. As with Ronin, hammers have an 
    advantage here. That being said, be careful when attacking from the rear since 
    you may end up hitting the spikes instead.
    TEAM: Spark
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 364.9
    DRIVE: 2 red birds
    WEAPON: Dual Spear (2 Iron Fists)
    DIFFICULTY: hard
    Literally a punch bot, this guy is going to hit hard and fast. Those fists have 
    greater hit capabilities than the sledge hammers, at about a two-thirds of the 
    weight. Like ALARM, hammers and spears will probably have the most problems. 
    He's not invertible, but like Wideload, he can use those pistons to scoot 
    around. Caution to those who rip off those exposed pistons [Havok Alert!].
    TEAM: Spike Heads
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 353.1
    DRIVE: 4 red birds
    WEAPON: Lifter (Iron Spike)
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    Very much like Hanky Panky with exposed wheels. The only problem you might have 
    is that this machine is closer in weight to yours than the HW variation. With 4 
    redbirds it does have a better drive train than Hanky.
    TEAM: NorthPolers
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 411.9
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Hammer (Ice Pick)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    The difficulty of this robot somewhat depends on what type of robot you're 
    using. Most machines will have an easy time with him. Hammer bots, on the 
    other hand, will have it a little difficult because of he's so tall. So, your 
    damage values won't be very high. His height may make it difficult for some 
    lifters/launchers, just try tipping him on his side.
    TEAM: High Voltage
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 377.7
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: axe Lifter (2 Axe Heads), wedge body
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    He's a wedge, so depending on your ground clearance, he may be a problem. 
    Curiously, his own ground clearance is fairly high (for a wedge). The weapon 
    usually doesn't cause many problems and even breaks easily. Hammers will have a 
    field day.
    TEAM: Hex
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 318.1
    DRIVE: 2 red birds
    WEAPON: Ram (2 Pointy Tips)
    DIFFICULTY: very easy
    Nothing to really see here. He's not invertible, but does possess some phantom 
    sliding ability. He's big, boxy, has a crappy weapon and has high ground 
    clearance. What more do you want?
    TEAM: Z
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 320.5
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Wedge/Ram (2 Spike Strips)
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    I'm starting to think this was an after-thought. The spike strips provide for 
    a very narrow range of attack. Hammers may have some problems, hitting the 
    spikes instead of the body.
    DA DOG
    TEAM: SteelYard Dog
    ARMOR: aluminum
    WEIGHT: 287.3
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Ram (SD Snow Plow)
    DIFFICULTY: easy
    Basically this is a smaller Big Dog without the rear ram plate. His drive train 
    is the same as Big Dog, but more than 100 Kg lighter. This means he is 
    comparatively faster.  He also has pretty low ground clearance.
    TEAM: Riot
    ARMOR: steel
    WEIGHT: 389.2
    DRIVE: 4 right angles
    WEAPON: Spinner (Lawnmower Blade)
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    This guy's a spinner, though his blade doesn't do a whole lot of damage. This 
    is a problem to consider since many bar spinners don't do as much damage as 
    they should. This seems to stem from bad physics. So if the weapon was a disc, 
    than the potential danger would be higher. That aside, the wheels are exposed 
    and he's not invertible. Be careful if you knock off that exposed z-tek.
    TEAM: Megaton
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 417.4
    DRIVE: 2 right angles
    WEAPON: Spinner (2 Sledge Hammers + 2 pole spikes)
    DIFFICULTY: hard
    All around, a decent spinner that can even sometimes right himself if flipped 
    over. He doesn't really spin up until you get close to him, so his stored 
    kinetic energy won't be as high as it could be. If you have the armor for it, 
    rams, hammers and spears should just ram him into a wall and just keep smacking 
    down on him. In a spinner vs. spinner, I hope your weapons are mounted lower. 
    In a rumble, see if you can get him to beat up the other machines first.
    TEAM: Scrapper
    ARMOR: titanium
    WEIGHT: 481.5
    DRIVE: 2 right angles
    WEAPON: vertical spinning disc
    DIFFICULTY: medium-easy
    Sadly, this is the only fully invertible robot of the weight class. BEWARE! 
    This guy is a rolling Havok explosion waiting to happen! Still, just knock off 
    the front support wheels and his weapon is useless.
    RA206C ************************************************************************
    LIGHT WEIGHTS: (0-249.9)
    This can be one of the hardest weight classes simply because you have to cram 
    everything into the 249.9 limit. It is very difficult to have a balanced OMD 
    machine. Usually one has to be strong, the others very weak. Definitely build a 
    SRM or be invertible because it is very easy to get tossed around.
    TEAM: Red Zone
    armor: titanium
    weight: 243.5
    drive: 2 right angles
    weapon: Lifter (Forklift Arm), (wedge body)
    difficulty: medium-easy
    Basically, this guy is Sentinel, but a better driver. His sloped front and 
    sides makes him harder to get under than his bigger brother.
    Prehistoric: Roly Poly
    armor: plastic
    weight: 236.1
    drive: 4 right angles
    weapon: Ram (2 Pointy Tips)
    difficulty: easy
    Avoid the spikes and hit him with whatever you got; he's that easy.
    Good Ol' Boys: Catfish
    armor: aluminum
    weight: 244.5
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Wedge/Ram, (2 Iron Spikes)
    difficulty: easy
    Can't say there's much to this guy. Decent drive train for the weight class,  
    but a crappy driver. 
    Dragon: Ninja
    armor: aluminum
    weight: 236.0
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Vertical Spinner (2 Ninja Stars)
    difficulty: medium-easy
    This pseudo-vertical spinner only does mediocre damage. Watch out for Havok 
    explosions from those weapon motors, however. It's a decent design I suppose, 
    if only it was invertible.
    Black Storm: BOT-204
    armor: aluminum
    weight: 242.3
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Saw (Rip Saw), Wedge body
    difficulty: easy
    Hey, look everybody; it's Ankle Biter! However, the caster on the front 
    prevents the wedge from getting under most opponents (unless you have really 
    high ground clearance). Thus, his weapon doesn't pose much of a threat. Plus, 
    he's not invertible.
    Spark: Jackpot!
    armor: aluminum
    weight: 241.8
    drive: 2 red birds
    Weapon: Hammer (Mace), Wedge body
    difficulty: medium-hard
    Here's a decent mix of a hammer and wedge design. Like all the Spark machines, 
    treat with respect. Since he's a hammer bot, he can often recover from a flip.
    Spike Heads: M.A.D.
    armor: steel
    weight: 249.9
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Ram (2 Iron Spikes)
    difficulty: easy
    This is almost Roly Poly with better armor, so the only concern is you have to 
    hit him more times.
    NorthPolers: MiniBerg
    armor: plastic
    weight: 244.7
    drive: 4 right angles
    weapon: Hammer (Ice Pick)
    difficulty: medium
    Essentially a smaller version of Iceberg with similar strengths and weaknesses.
    High Voltage: Flapjack
    armor: titanium
    weight: 244.1
    drive: 2 right angles
    weapon: Lifter (Small Wedge)
    difficulty: medium-easy
    In essence the same thing as Scout, just with a larger flipper.
    Hex: Flame Chopper
    armor: aluminum
    weight: 259.2
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Hammer (Fireman's Axe)
    difficulty: medium
    An ok hammer bot. Not quite the same prowess as Jackpot, but (depending on the 
    weapon type) don't underestimate him either.
    Z: Berserker
    armor: plastic
    weight: 243.7
    drive: 2 right angles
    weapon: Spinner (rotator-mounted Axe Heads)
    difficulty: hard
    I freaking hate this guy. If your attack surface is lower than his axes, then 
    you'll be fine (spinners, wedges). Vertical spinners are going to have some 
    difficulty (actually, vertical spinners are hard to make as a LW). See if you 
    can be lucky enough to flip him over.
    SteelYard Dog: Lil' Dog
    armor: plastic
    weight: 224.5
    drive: 4 right angles
    weapon: Wedge
    difficulty: easy
    It's a non-reinforced, un-invertible, plastic wedge. Aim and kill.
    Riot: Civil Disobedience
    armor: titanium
    weight: 219.0
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Ram (spike strip), wedge body
    difficulty: easy
    A wedge with a spike that's not invertible. Basically this is Catfish with 
    weaker armor.
    Megaton: Stinger
    armor: steel
    weight: 244.6
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Spear (Razor Spike)
    difficulty: medium
    Like a lot of spears, poses a threat dependent on your weapon. He's pretty good 
    at keeping his weapon facing you. No, he's not invertible.
    Scrapper: Arc Pounder
    armor: plastic
    weight: 237.6
    drive: 2 red birds
    weapon: Thwack (Sledge Hammer)
    difficulty: medium-easy
    Personally, I've never had too much problem with this guy. It's pretty easy to 
    get within his spin and break off his weapon. He might pose a problem to a 
    lifter/launcher since he's invertible.
    RA206D ************************************************************************
    Q: How do I play as the AI bots?
    A: Go into the folder marked "AI" and you will see 15 team folders. Inside each 
    folder are 3 bot files. Copy these files into the Robot Designs folder and then 
    re-name them. (Bot0 is the lightweight, Bot1 is the middle, Bot2 is the heavy)
    RA207 =========================================================================
    Well, you've made your bots, but it won't do much good staying in your team's 
    "garage." You've now have take it and test its might and metal in battle!
    (Note: Any setting changes done in exhibitions carries over to the events)
    RA207A ************************************************************************
    In these types of events you battle it out against a single opponent to the 
    death! The match ends when either one of you dies, gets counted out, falls 
    into a pit, or time runs out (default at 3 minutes). In events, you will get 
    30 minutes to make repairs to your machine between each match. Anything that 
    got knocked off during a battle automatically takes 20 minutes to repair, so 
    be careful in your fights. Unlike the Robot Wars games, you cannot partially 
    repair things. A death match event will have you in four matches as the 
    tournament tree runs down. As far as I can tell, the winner of the AI battles 
    on the other sides of the tree are completely random. 
    Team Deathmatch is similar, just a 2-on-2 or 2-on-1. I don't think there's a 
    way to set up a 3-on-1
    Battle Royale
    This features you versus 3 other robots at the same time in the arena. Other 
    than that, the same rules in deathmatches apply here. In events, there are 
    only 2 matches, but a grand total of 6 robots go towards your kill score. Take 
    note that the kill score is based solely on matches won. Even if you killed 
    two robots, but lost the match, you won't get credit for those kills. A royale 
    can be tough since the likelihood of something breaking on your robot is 
    greater when facing multiple opponents. Yes, you still only get 30 minutes 
    between matches. As such, spinners are not recommended for these types. You can 
    try alleviating this by playing vulture or leading the AI into each other (they
    usually just attack the nearest robot). 
    (Note: I will generally refer to these as "Rumbles" which is the Battlebot 
    term for putting multiple robots in the arena)
    Bridge of Doom:
         4 Flamethrowers 
         (Low overhangs)
         BBA Midwest Event
         Robot Magazine Combat Event
         Sawblade Elite Competition
    4-way rumbles:
    Do not enter a large or wide robot into any battles in this arena. Also make 
    sure you have sufficient ground clearance. The bridge and the overhangs with 
    the flamethrowers are particularly annoying for some hammers and many vertical 
    spinners. A savvy ram or spear may even jam your weapon by shoving you under 
    the bridge before it can complete the return swing. That, or they could hide in 
    the safety of the bridge or overhang and attack with impunity. 
    Flamethrowers are small damage hazards doing around 25 damage per 1/4 second 
    you are under the jet. All in all, they aren't much of a threat. It seems 
    impossible for it to damage the control board. 
    Against the AI an interesting strategy is to almost immediately climb the 
    bridge. The AI has problems navigating it a lot of times and sometimes even 
    gets stuck. This gives you a great window of opportunity to attack.
    Combat Arena
         1 Large killsaw
         2 Extending spike plates
         Destructavision TV Show
         F.O.R.C.E. Tournament
         Grand Tournament of Robots
         Strategic Engineering Robot Games
    4-way rumbles
         Masters of Destruction
    Well, for everyone whose dreamt of putting a machine in the Battlebox (and 
    since the Battlebots games have been canceled), here's your chance (or get 
    AW's B-bot pack). The fight takes place in a flat perfect square, so ground 
    clearance is not a huge problem. 
    The big saw is similar to the flame throwers in damage, doing small points of 
    damage per ~1/4 second you remain on the hazard. Unlike the flame throwers, 
    these can effect your control board, although it is a rare occurrence. I 
    believe it's because something is physically striking your robot. Well, really 
    it's just a setting in the program file, but I think that's the philosophy at 
    any rate. The other hazards are two sets of pneumatic spikes that shoot up from 
    the ground. These things usually cause between 40-125 points of damage per hit. 
    Spikes are one of the most unreliable hazards. They pretty much shoot up 
    whenever the computer wants to. You can try taking advantage of this during 
    events since most AI's go around the hazards. Just plow across and get to at 
    their sides or rear. Saws, on the other hand, extend whenever anything gets 
    close. Both hazards rarely become a concern unless you're using lightweights or 
    your control board is critical. Do know that if you don't have the hazards 
    switched on, the computer is not afraid to box-rush you (ram you from one end 
    of the arena to the other).
    Compressor Arena
         2 Crushers
         (Spike strips)
         Robot Scrapyard
    4-way rumbles
    A bit unique since the fences around the starting point gives you no choice 
    regarding the ramps. You must employ a robot with enough ground clearance. 
    Thankfully, only one event uses this arena, so you always know which one it is. 
    The match is also thankfully deathmatch, as the fences would make for a very 
    narrow battle at the beginning of a rumble. Spinners would have a huge problem 
    in that case. 
    The crushers at either end of the main fighting area are very deadly and very 
    reliable. Their attack intervals are usually slow enough such that a mobile 
    robot can get out if hit once. It is possible to sort of jam the crushers by 
    getting a part stuck behind it, but the chance of this happening is almost 
    negligible. The spikes strips in the lower fighting area are present even if 
    you set hazards off. The only threat they really pose is getting high-centered 
    on top of them.
    Half-Circle Arena 
         1 Giant hammer
         2 Sets of killsaws
         Robo-Destroyers Competition
    4-way rumbles
    The center piece of this arena is the giant hammer that will lay waste to just 
    about anything under it. 3 ramps lead into the clearly-marked point of 
    destruction. These ramps mean your bot should have sufficient ground clearance. 
    Even though you can just patrol the outer ring, like the bridge, there is a 
    risk of getting pushed or knocked down into the entrenched area. The somewhat 
    narrow trenches may give some spinners or other wide robots problems. 
    The Hammer strikes at anything that falls under or near it (about the same 
    detection as saws) doing heavy damage. There are some smaller kill saws in the 
    upper level, which usually don't come into play unless there are multiple 
    opponents, or you're using the upper area to exploit the AI's ramp problem.
    Electric Arena
         High-voltage grill
         Father-Daughter Brunch and Robotic Combat
         Remote Xplosion
    4-way rumbles
    This is a flat arena, the largest in fact. However, make sure you have 
    sufficient pushing power in your robot, otherwise you're going for a trip onto 
    the arena's only hazard. As such, it is not recommended to enter a spinner.
    The large grill in the middle zaps any chassis that goes over it. This jolt 
    results in a series of ~25 damage points (around 10) to your entire chassis. 
    Your batteries, motors and armor are effected. Unlike saws or flame throwers, 
    you receive this set of damage points every time. Like flame throwers, the 
    electric bolt will not damage your control board. Know that the jolt causes the 
    victim to bounce around a bit, this just might be enough for a flipped opponent 
    to right themselves. Note that the grill will not work if more than one robot 
    is on it at the same time. In a case like that, you have to hit the buttons in 
    opposite corners. 
    Parking-lot Arena
         2 sets of falling cinder blocks
    4-way rumble
         Hot Dog Harry's Downtown Rumble
    This is another generally flat arena. It's about as primitive as it looks. Just 
    keep in mind that you start rather close to your opponents, so spinners with 
    long spin-up times will have problems. The arena is also fairly small. This 
    arena, also features (in my opinion) the crappiest camera angles.
    The cinder blocks rarely become much of a factor in this match. They fall too 
    slowly to be really effective. However, they can create a danger of 
    high-centering your robot. 
    Note: for online matches, just switch the hazards off. You'll prevent a lot of 
    lag that way.
    Metal Skull Arena
         2 Extending spikes plates
         1 Pit
         Mortal Robot
         Ultimate Fighting Machine Competition
    4-way rumbles
         Pit of Destruction
    Frankly, this arena is rather boring. It is nice that if you do enter a robot 
    that can't handle ramps, you can just drive off the ledge. In fact, this is 
    recommended, as long as you can survive a run like that. This puts you in a 
    position to catch the opponent as they travel down the other ramp. The 
    AI usually drives very predictably down ramps, giving you a free shot.
    The pit starts opening about 10 seconds into the fight. Anything that falls 
    into the pit is automatically counted out. If you think about it, this balances 
    the arena out for rams, wedges and lifters, giving them an easier time. The 
    spikes are the same from the Combat Arena, and just as reliable. However, the 
    locations make them even less useful.
    Octagon Arena
         2 Hammers
         2 Hell-raisers
         4 Pits
         Powerbolt Championship
    4-way rumbles
         Biggie Bot Mash
         Metal Warriors Event
    This arena is tough since the hazards make for very cramped places to fight in. 
    It is especially tough on spinners, since usually when you hit you'll be 
    knocked out of control. By the same token, physics anomalies are deadly here. 
    The hammers are smaller than the one in Half-circle, but no less dangerous. 
    Pit covers begin sliding back ~13 seconds after go time. Arguably, the most 
    dangerous hazards are the hellraisers since it is not uncommon to get tossed 
    into a pit. 
    It's a dirty trick, but if you somehow end up on the outer raised 
    area, position yourself behind one of the pits. The computer opponents will 
    try to get to your position, and fall right in.
    RA207B ************************************************************************
    If you've seen Robotica, this game type is similar to the "Fight to the finish" 
    without any guard rails. You start on an elevated platform and have to knock 
    your opponents over the edge before they do. The scoring system is the same as 
    the deathmatches/rumbles so you can kill opponents the old fashioned way. Rams, 
    wedges and lifters shine in these events. In general, spinners should not be 
    entered. Drums and face spinners are usually ok. For vertical spinners, it's 
    dependent on the drive train and weapon shape/size. If you're a DA/Nightmare 
    type of machine, you might not want to enter.
    ClawTop Arena
         4 Sets of flame throwers
         2 Claws
    4-way rumbles
         Blackvolt TNT Tournament
         Toledo Robotics Club Gathering
    Very simple. Note that this is the only arena where you start out facing away 
    from your opponents (almost back-to-back, no less). If you have a robot with a 
    strong and/or effective rear weapon, you may just opt to just reverse at the 
    start and take out whoever's behind you. As with all tabletops, this is a 
    pushing match more than anything else. Alternately, you can just charge forward 
    away from your opponents. More often than not, they'll be busy beating on each 
    other. Then, either wait for an opening, or until one other's standing.
    Be careful of the flame pits. They are slightly recessed into the playing 
    surface so a robot without sufficient ground clearance will get stuck here. The 
    claws are usually too slow and can be driven out of the way.
    FlexTop Arena
    4-way rumbles
         Blade Tournament
    Ok, I hope none of you get sea sick easily. This is a very unique battle arena. 
    Have a wide, low robot with lots of traction. Do not enter a spinner. Vertical 
    spinners can try bracing themselves against one of the four edges that stick up 
    if necessary. Lots of traction and low center of gravity is key. As with the 
    other table, you can opt to just avoid everyone else and let them kill each 
    other. Un-clicking the hazard check box prevents the table from moving. Then, 
    it's just a generic pushing battle.
    RA207C ************************************************************************
    Seemingly very simple, the idea is the get to the top of the hill and stay 
    there for as long as possible. The scoring system is different here. You get 10 
    points for about every half-second you (and you alone) are at the top. The 
    points are given by the location of your chassis, not your 
    extensions/weapon(s). Like tables, rams, wedges and lifters fair the best. 
    Obviously, since they're hills, ground clearance is a big issue.
    You don't get any points for damaging the opponents, but you also don't get any 
    damage indicators. This makes determining your condition difficult. You can 
    still kill your opponents, but it isn't the focus of this arena type. By 
    default, these are four-player as well.
         4 sets of razor spikes
    4-way rumbles
         Robotic Terror Zone
    The hill for this arena is rather small so expect a lot of carnage. 
    The razor spikes in the corners are just bigger versions of the pneumatic 
    spikes from Metal Skull & Combat Arenas -- and yes, retain their reliability.
    Hill Top Arena
         2 spike zones
         2 flamethrower zones
    4-way rumbles
         Powerup Robot Bash
    This is a much taller hill with a smaller area to fight at the top. Even with 
    the patch, the AI has problems if knocked into the hazard zones.
    The spikes pits, this time, seem reliable because of their numbers and arguably 
    the more dangerous of the hazards. 
    RA207D ************************************************************************
    Q: How many seasons are there?
    A: Infinite. You can keep playing  til you die (Although on my game the kill 
    count is unreadable after about 1700). No, there are no bonuses or what-not 
    after playing so many seasons. 
    Q: Isn't there a repair cheat?
    A: In the original release, yes. You could click to the main menu and then 
    click back to resume the event, getting another 30 minutes of repair time. The 
    patch fixes this.
    Q: Any other cheats?
    A: Well, if you think about it, if you're losing a match you can just terminate 
    the program (hit the Windows key and then do an "End Process"). You would then 
    just play the match over again (and again and again until you win). Do note 
    that you will lose your sound until you reload RA2.
    RA208 =========================================================================
    Pick a machine that has a lot of maneuverability. Being able to attack in 
    different directions is also helpful. 
    Here is a technique that is mostly regulated to vertical spinners and drums 
    (and some saws), but hammers and some spears can get in as well. Basically this 
    is getting under the opponent and striking the under belly plate with your 
    weapon. Statistically, most robots have extra armor on the top and on the 
    front, the bottom is almost never reinforced. This of course requires the 
    ability to get under the opponent and/or flip them over. There really isn't 
    much the opponent can do while taking this kind of damage. The only possible 
    time to not do this is against under-cutters. Back off after awhile, though, or 
    else it starts to resemble pinning.
    This is a tactic that is largely frowned upon in the RA2 community. It involves 
    merely pressing an opponent against a wall and staying there. This is not the 
    same as when a ram bot repeatedly backs off and rams (at quick intervals). 
    Against the computer, this is fine. The AI doesn't care. Not only that, but 
    sometimes the AI actually uses this against you. However, in most online 
    battles this is not a welcome case. One can argue it's like "Camping" in FPS 
    games. However, there are perfectly good tactics available to counter Campers. 
    Is it like Roll Canceling in CvS2? No, because you can't accidentally pin some 
    one. In CvS tournaments it's so hard to regulate roll canceling. If you've been 
    to Sirlin.net, you've read his theories on playing to win. In that sense, yes, 
    the game only understands that there is a winner and a loser. That's all it 
    knows. So with that mind set, pinning would be part of anything goes strategy. 
    I'm going to pull from robotic combat history on this. In the past Robot Wars 
    events, there has been battles won on pinning. However, this was deemed boring 
    and thus the 30 second rule was invented. The pinning robot has to pull back 
    after thirty seconds. 
    Online gaming is of course up to you and you just might not care what the 
    community thinks of you. Naturally, you should read the rules of the battle 
    you're entering. This tactic may be banned from tournaments. Now, you might be 
    thinking "I've lost my primary weapon and it's the only way I can win," If 
    you've lost your primary weapon and the opponent is miles ahead of you, than 
    you might actually consider tapping out (forfeit). If both of you are these 
    sad, barely-rolling chassis, maybe try restarting the match. Once the countdown 
    starts, pull back. Don't immediately start pinning them again. See if the 
    opponent can move. The game comes with a chat feature. Use it. 
    Always test your machine.
    After you make a modification, always run it through the test arena. Often 
    times in the excitement of building something, you forgot to [re-]wire an 
    element. The crates and the cones are too light to be of much use. Use the 
    blocks, barrels and ramps instead. Check to see that you have sufficient ground 
    clearance. Other things to do is to do an exhibition match in the Octagon Arena 
    and purposely drive over a hellraiser to check invertibility. Test your robot 
    against each of the main weapons types (especially a wedge, a lifter, a hammer 
    and a spinner)
    Practice! Practice! Practice!
    Being able to drive and control your robot like it's a second skin is a must. 
    You might wonder how Battlebot Dr. Inferno Jr. can do so well in battle. It's 
    in how well Jason Bardis drives his machine. Why do certain veterans do so 
    well? The number one thing is that they know how to drive their machine in an 
    almost flawless manner. They know the strengths and weaknesses of their 
    machine. Keep in mind you have an additional luxury of sparring in the various 
    arenas (in real robot combat, the arenas often change). Know the arenas. Know 
    which ones your robot(s) do well in and develop strategies for different 
    Be aware of what battle you're entering. 
    Remember that online battles do not require repair time. A robot optimized for 
    single player tournament trees will be different than an online one. Also know 
    which arena is being used. Know if it's a one-on-one match or a rumble. Avoid 
    using spinners in Table tops. Table top matches are also usually short matches. 
    AW took advantage of this in a tournament by using the most powerful motors, 
    but minimal batteries. 
    Patience. Dedication. Persistence. 
    Unless you're against a spinner, you almost never rush in. More often than not, 
    you're going to wait for a moment of weakness. Keep at it. Don't give up. Your 
    first machine probably won't be successful. After a match, analyze what worked 
    and what didn't. Every design can be improved in some way. 
    Target Priorities.
    In order of exposure, you should aim for:
    Chassis: Every hit is one more step closer to a knock out. Hits near the motor  
        axles will start to effect their performance. Any slowdown or lack of 
        mobility for the opponent is your advantage. 
    Wheels: Wheels are ~500 hit points. A missing wheel is that much of a reduction 
        in driving ability. Driving straight is incredibly difficult. Knock off 
        enough of them and a count-out can be achieved.
    Extenders: Possess some of the smallest hit points. It is these things that 
        usually snap during a fight, rather than the actual weapon heads. However, 
        since extenders can be for anything, this does not guarantee much for a 
        victory. It is an easy way to get the crowd going.
    Exposed mechanics: Like taking off wheels, this will really debilitate the 
        opponent, however use caution because of havok issues. While it is usually 
        weapons with exposed mechanics, there's been a trend for drive trains being 
        mounted externally.
    Winning the Crowd
    Let me precede this by saying that despite what the guy in "Gladiator" says, 
    winning the crowd won't get you crap. However, I acknowledge that it isn't very 
    fun to hear an audience booing you. There are a few things that can get the 
    audience cheering:
    1. [repeated] Hard hits - Any hit over ~100 points ought to get the audience 
        going. It doesn't matter where the hit came from (you, hazards, etc.).
    2. Break Something - Any time a part snaps off, the audience goes wild
    3. Damage the Control Board - Crowds love sparks.
    4. K.O. the Opponent - Audiences love robotic death (count-outs and ring-outs 
        don't count).
    RA209 =========================================================================
    Havok Explosions are basically whenever the physics engine goes wacko. 
    Mines: This is probably the most common kind of Havok glitch. I tend to think 
    of these things like inverted black holes. You can't see them and the only way 
    to know where they are is by when other objects are repelled by them. The 
    biggest culprit for these "mines," as RadioFSoftware calls them, is knocking 
    off any external motor. 
    Of the AI robots, these include:
    Backyard Ripper (hard to do, though), Mud Runner, REVENGE, RipBlade, Ninja
    Boxer's pneumatic pistons cause problems as well.
    External casters are also problematic, so RipBlade is a major headache.
    When any of these parts are knocked off (all that matters is the motor, the 
    attached wheels/weapons don't factor) an invisible anomaly is created. This is 
    at the point of disconnection, not where the part lands.
    How these points of physics errors effect you depends often on your own robot. 
    Most spinners will get tossed around.
    Burst motors have caused some problems. These involve many flippers. I've seen 
    this with Sentinel and EMERGENCY. EMERGENCY seems to be after the flippers have 
    been knocked off, and it goes flying into the air.
    Stacking anything increases the risk of Havok explosions. These motors are 
    spinning at outrageous speeds and sometimes the motors start to "break." This 
    is the first sign that something is wrong.
    Overloaded bots (ones with tons of attachments) cause problems, especially if 
    it has a lot of moving parts. Don't be surprised if your bot suddenly gets 
    swallowed into the floor. Also don't overload the bot with unnecessary 
    batteries. Overpowering the motors causes problems.
    Project Trinity Effect: So named and developed by MAD Scientist (which in turn 
    is named after a nuclear explosion test). This is a centrifuge principle gone 
    wrong. The way you achieve this is by mounting burst pistons on a disc on a 
    spin motor. Mount something to the burst pistons like sledge hammers. When the 
    spin motor reaches top-speed (the rails of the pistons start to pull out), fire 
    the pistons. The result is something that resembles a tornado or a top that 
    does massive damage as the rotation speed hits astronomical numbers. Take note 
    that you will have absolutely no control of the robot as it whirls around like 
    the freaking Death Blossom from Last Starfighter.
    RA210 =========================================================================
    Online FAQ's
    Q: Why is the game so laggy?
    A: For that answer, I shall let TDS answer that: My knowledge of Internet 
    gaming is not that extensive, so I won't even try pretending.
    (The following is an edited version of TDS's post "Why RA2 Lags 101" first 
    posted on March 14, 2003 at 6:12am on AceUplink:) 
    1. "But other games....."
    Stop right there, RA2 is not UT2003 [Unreal Tournament 2003], is not another 
    game, it is RA2. UT2003 for example, runs on a primitive physics engine that 
    everything can be PREDICTED. That is right, all UT's netcode says is "I fired X 
    projectile from X location at Y heading" and the CLIENT takes care of the rest. 
    Having 32 people running around doesn't cause the game to blow up because as 
    far as the netcode is concerned, each person is a single point in space with a 
    heading, speed, and location. That's it.
    Now for RA2. Ra2 runs on the Havok physics engine, there is an element of 
    randomness to it so it CANNOT be predicted at ANY time (for the most part) Let 
    me reiterate that, if you had a rocket launcher in RA2, instead of one "I fired 
    a rocket" signal, you would be sending five or ten per SECOND until that rocket 
    hit something. In addition, EVERY SINGLE COMPONENT in EVERY ROBOT is tracked 
    though the netcode. In the new patch, the torque and energy (I believe) isn't 
    directly tracked, reducing the "lag" so to speak.
    Also, unlike other games, there is NO DEDICATED SERVER for RA2, this means, you 
    are relying on the person that created the room to do the server-ing. Try 
    creating a game of Half Life or UT online and having 32 people join it, and see 
    if your connection can handle it. IT WONT. In addition, the server is taking in 
    and sending out several times more data than in a FPS server, processing it, 
    and sending it out. When the server gets out of synch, it slows down, causing 
    that lag that you notice. FPS servers don't give a rats ass about the players 
    and keep going regardless. It only takes one person with a low end 
    CPU/connection to cause lag for every player. Yes, you should close down AIM 
    and the rest of the crap you are running.
    2. "the netcode sucks"
    No, it doesn't. You have two choices when it comes to netcode, you can try to 
    predict, and you will have things teleporting around/choppily moving/ etc. or 
    you can synch everything and slow it down. You have two choices people, you can 
    be happy with what you have, or you could be complaining about how you had 
    someone pinned in the wall, then suddenly they were behind you hitting you, 
    then they were across the arena, then you were suddenly dead with him no where 
    around. I really have almost no problem with the current netcode. You get 
    teleported back a second or so every once in a while, just redo what you did, 
    yes, its sometimes annoying, but its better than having things vanish and move 
    around at will isn't it? MOST, if not ALL of the lag I have experienced has 
    been because of poorly designed bots, I've covered this in another thread. 
    Also, if you are unconvinced by this post, feel FREE to get the trial version 
    of Havok and grace us with your brilliance, come up with better netcode, I'm 
    sure GI would be GLAD to include it in a future patch. Every last person that 
    has complained that I have heard cannot even COMPREHEND what is going on 
    between the computers, forget even begin to think of fixing it. I don't know 
    about you guys, but personally when I don't know something, or I think 
    something should be better, I don't sit around and complain, I look into it, 
    and ask questions. If something is so bad to cause you to bitch and moan about 
    it, do something about it, or you have no right to complain.
    RA211 =========================================================================
    Q: Why even have this section?
    A: It is a popular Robot site, dedicated especially to Robot Arena. Most 
    likely, anyone who reads this will go there. (And yes, shameless plug)
    Q: Why does the Showcase get closed?
    A: Some poor soul forgot to attach an image of a robot in their post. Doing so 
    means automatic closing of the thread for a week. TDS and other moderators 
    follow this one rule of that thread religiously and without fail (ok, sometimes 
    they make exceptions, but it is rare). Also, do not make a temporary thread 
    during the dead time. It will more often than not get deleted.
    Q: I was looking for [_____] and its not one of the threads available. 
    [What can I do?]
    A: Use the search feature. The board often only shows the first ~20 or so most 
    recent threads. 
    Q: What are Ant-weights?
    A: Ants refer to a 1lb weight class of fighting robots that has gotten popular 
    in recent years. On Aceuplink, a translated version of this has been made. In 
    essence it is technically a very slim lightweight. The rules are as follows:
    Maximum weight of 125 kg. ("Beetleweights" are 175)
    Max chassis grid size of 5x5 (25 square units). Height unlimited.
    No Z-teks
    No large burst motors on non-flippers (ie. No large hammers)
    Q: What is the Battle Bot AI Pack?
    A: One of the first major add-on packs for RA2, is the set of Battlebot 
    replicas created mostly by AW, Hazard, and other AU members. 45 of your 
    favorite Battle Bots replace the old computer opponents. The pack was widely 
    received, though incredibly difficult for newcomers (Son of Whyachi is 
    practically invulnerable). The pack has since been taken down, and now 
    succeeded by the DSL pack.
    Q: What is the Ubermod?
    A: Ubermod is TDS's brainchild, an almost complete overhaul of all the default 
    parts, plus some additional ones. The goal was to get more realistic combat 
    robots and not over-loaded bloat bots. It introduces a gear ratio system for 
    all the motors. Later version also attempt to remedy the problem with blade 
    spinners. The download is at AU. 
    Q: What is the StarCore AI Pack?
    A: StarCore is an AU member and created a set of robots to replace the computer 
    opponents. More difficult than the default machines by a long shot, yet uses 
    all standard parts.
    Q: What is DSL:TC?
    A: DSL:TC, or Darkrat Starcore Lu-Tze's Total Conversion, is the latest in 
    trying to revive the RA2 game. Blending ideas in the BattleBot AI pack and the 
    Ubermod, is the creation of Darkrat (3D models and parts), Starcore (AI), and 
    Lu-Tze (3D models, parts, arenas, utilities) and many others (among them: 
    goose, C2, Hazard, ACAMS and Rejected). Over 250 new parts to use. The motors 
    are virtually all unique to the pack. The AI machines mixes Battle Bots, Robot 
    Wars, Robot Assault, and other local tournaments. The pack is still in its beta 
    stage, but looks promising.
    RA212 =========================================================================
    Q: I have the downloaded demo and registered. But I can't get the patch to 
    work. I hear I need to have the CD, but I don't have the CD because it's down-
    loaded. . . . (Etc. Etc.).
    How do I get the patch?
    A: You have to go to Trymedia's website (trygames.com) and re-download the 
    demo. This should be the most-updated version. When it prompts you, just re-
    apply for a licence.
    Q: [________] is wrong/incorrect. Or I want to contribute [________].
    A: E-mail me. (korium@prodigy.net)
    Q: "Invertibility" is not a word.
    A: And that's not a question.
    Q: Could you build me a bot?
    A: No. The point of the this FAQ is to supply you with some knowledge so you 
    can make your own. That is what the game is for: seeing what _you_ can build.
    Q: Even if I paid you?
    A: Yes. Besides, there is no asking price that wouldn't make me feel guilty in 
    some way.
    Q: Will you put up your robots for download?
    A: Not likely.
    Q: Who are you anyway?
    A: I go by "Korium9" on the AU forums (not mention most other forums I visit). 
    On the AU forum, I won the best "Minion Replica Contest" and made a few other 
    machines that granted me title of "Master o' the Art Bots." (Great-looking 
    robots that don't do crap) I have a deviantart account at 
    Q: Oh! Can you do a skin for me?
    A: Unlikely, depends on the robot and how much time I have, so don't get your 
    hopes up. E-mail or IM me and we'll talk.
    Q: Why can't I find Infogrames?
    A: Apparently it's now called ATARI corp. That's all I know.
    Q: I want to make a real robot. Where do I start?
    A: Try some of these links and then branch out from there.
    Official Site: http://www.robotarena.com/
    AceUplink: http://www.aceuplink.com/
    AU downloads: AU http://www.aceuplink.com/ra2/
    B4B (nearly every download available): http://www.the.iwarp.com/downloads.html
    Lu-Tze's component page: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.foster47/
    RA-Reborn (some other stuff): http://ra-reborn.com/downloads.php
    StarCore AI pack : http://home.comcast.net/~jeffmilburn/Starcore.html
    DSL:TC Forum (successor to the Ubermod and BB:AI):
    Another place for downloads:
    List of Links, Tools & Tutorials
    RA213 =========================================================================
    Infogrames and Gabriel Interactive, who are responsible for creating and 
    distributing the game.
    Weapons break-down based on "Build Your Own Combat Robot" by Pete Miles and 
    Tom Carroll and "Battlebots: The Official Guide," by Mark Clarkson.
    "Building Lag Friendly Bots," "Motor and Battery Statistics," "Official 
    Antweight Rules," "Playing RA2," "Self-righting 101," "TDS Tutorials," "Why 
    RA2 Lags," TDS, AceUplink administrator
    "Avoiding Havok Explosions," "Defeating the Heavyweights," "Getting New 
    Components," "Intimidating (Scaring) the Opponents," "Worst Case Scenario 
    Guide to Robotic Combat,"  RadioFSoftware, (aka Psygnos) AceUplink board member
    "How to Kill Any Design," MiniDJBeirne, AceUplink board member
    "Battle Tactics," "Having Multiple RA2's on hard drive," "Motor Comparisons," 
    Anarchy5099, AceUplink member
    "Batteries, CO2 tanks, Motors, etc. stats," Destroyer 101
    "How to host a game," Disembowelinatron, AceUplink member
    "Razor Blade tip," disturbed, AceUplink board member
    "Spinner FAQ," Nimm02, AceUplink board member.
    AU power pack was created by AW, AceUplink administrator.
    Other AU board contributors: ACAMS, clutch1, DarkRat, Fedexrico, Jimxorb, 
    Goose, mean2u, Panic Attack, reckah, Talon, TeamOmegaforce, Team Ragnarok, 
    Toxic, Wildcard
    Legal stuff:
    This is an unofficial guide intended on helping and informing the gaming 
    community. I am not affiliated with Infogrames, Gabriel Interactive, 
    Battlebots, etc (although I am an AceUplink board member) in any way. This 
    guide cannot be published or used for profit of any kind without permission. 
    Do not link directly to this text file. Link to the GameFAQs html page.
    All trademarks and copyrights (of and including Robot Arena, Battle Bots, 
    Robotica, and Robot Wars) are owned by their respective companies
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Farewell Lu-Tze +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    The writer would like to take a moment and dedicate this FAQ to Lucy Foster 
    (aka "Lu-Tze") who sadly passed away on October 3, 2004. I didn't knew her very 
    well, but I have admired her work. She will be missed.
    Rest in Peace, Lu-Tze. Thank You & Goodnight. 
    I would sincerely like to thank Lu-Tze for all her help in the RA2 community. 
    She was a great friend and a joy to work with, Even at the end while she was 
    very sick she gave her last days to Robot Area. She knew about her illness 
    right from when we first met her but choose to keep it to herself until the 
    last two months. She once told me Robot Arena 2 was her way to keep her mind 
    off her very serious illness. we had many great times and I truly miss her . 
    Your friend always,
    Lu-Tze was arguably the best modder of RA2. She was Most certainly the best 
    Arena builder. The thing I liked most about her was that she saw ability in 
    everyone, and would not stop trying to help until the person got the results 
    they wanted. She helped me a real lot, if it wasn't for her I would not be able 
    to do the things I can now. She gave me Confidence in myself to make a 
    component. She was a joy to talk to, always making dull moments fun.
    Thank you Lu-Tze... the longer your gone the more I miss you.
    She was a revolutionary, a real innovator... She created things that none of us 
    could even comprehend on how to create.
    She was a great member of this community and we will miss her humor and her 
    great additions to this game.
    Lu-Tze and I weren't always in communication. In fact, I don't recall one event 
    where we had ever conversed. But I respected her work for Robot Arena 2, and 
    her willingness to help others when they didn't know how to do something quite 
    right. If the world had more people like her, it would be a better place. 
    RIP Lucy, you WILL be missed. 
    -Justin "Radio F Software" Bardin
    I must say that a lot of other people knew here better than I did but from the 
    few times I got to talk to her she always seemed to have a sense of humor even 
    with the thought of a short ending life on her mind. I looked up to her and had 
    a lot of respect for her and what she did. Lu-Tze, you will be missed by all.
    -Ryan St.John/Ry_Trapp0 
    She was the most patient girl for helping other as far as I know. She's been 
    the best component maker for RA2 and her wheel tutorial was the revolution in 
    the making of component. 
    She was always willing to go out of her way to listen and help, even if it 
    meant waiting half an hour or half a day before she did what she intended to do 
    before you talked to her. 
    -Some kinda zombie
    I didn't know her or talked ever to her but I can say that her items and arenas 
    where better than excellent, its been strange playing with something that 
    someone has done and now can't use...
    I've heard only good things about Lu-Tze, so I can imagine she'd helped you a 
    lot with little projects and things. I think now I'll remember her when using 
    her comps.
    Every once in while, you come across something special. Something that sticks 
    out from the rest. Lu-tze did just that. She was undoubtedly one of the best 
    members that RA2 ever saw. Although she may be gone, her work will stay with us 
    forever. R.I.P Lu-tze.
    -Metal Virus
    I didn't know Lu-Tze personally, but she was always positive, respectful, and 
    helping to everyone. She helped me a lot with making components and arenas, and 
    I really miss having her around. Lu-Tze was without doubt one of the best 
    people in the RA2 community.
    Lu-Tze was a remarkable individual who cared deeply about the robotics 
    community. Her willingness to communicate with me the important issues and 
    inviting me to help however possible taught me a lot on how to approach people 
    and show them their importance to a greater cause, that cause being the DSL 
    mod. With out a doubt, Lu Tze contributed to the community is profound ways and 
    will be missed tremendously
    Lu-tze was just great. 
    Yea. One great arena and part maker. She seemed to always be around when you 
    needed help and did indeed help you. Eg. She helped me when I couldn't paint or 
    take photos of my robots(which were pretty bad back then :D). Why did the 
    illness have to happen to a kind person like her? This is a question that can't 
    be answered now sadly. Fair well Lucy. :( My you be in Heaven now. :(
    -Dragon Ninja
    I never knew Lu-Tze well, but I definitely respected her talent. She was truly 
    gifted and she did some truly amazing things with Robot Arena 2. Not only that 
    though, but she was a good person, too. We spoke a couple of times over AIM 
    and, even as a newcomer, she treated me like I'd been around for years. She 
    made everyone her friend, and that's why her loss is so painful for our 
    community. We've lost more than a talented modder, we've all lost a friend, and 
    the world has lost a wonderful human being. May she rest in peace, having 
    touched the lives of so many.
    ++++++++ If you would like to add your own words, contact me. -Korium9 ++++++++
    |WW. """ j A8W | """ ) gWW .AV .AWW AL=~* ;A W7 """ | """ j '""jW .AW| | """ AH
    |WW. AV .! AW# | AWV ) """ .AW .AWA.W| .+*"W,W .AWW | AWW 7 ====W |AW .j WW .AH

    View in: